Evolution and complexity: the double-edged sword

We attempt to provide a comprehensive answer to the question of whether, and when, an arrow of complexity emerges in Darwinian evolution. We note that this expression can be interpreted in different ways, including a passive, incidental growth, or a pervasive bias towards complexification. We argue at length that an arrow of complexity does indeed occur in evolution, which can be most reasonably interpreted as the result of a passive trend rather than a driven one. What, then, is the role of evolution in the creation of this trend, and under which conditions will it emerge? In the later sections of this article we point out that when certain proper conditions (which we attempt to formulate in a concise form) are met, Darwinian evolution predictably creates a sustained trend of increase in maximum complexity (that is, an arrow of complexity) that would not be possible without it; but if they are not, evolution will not only fail to produce an arrow of complexity, but may actually prevent any increase in complexity altogether. We conclude that, with regard to the growth of complexity, evolution is very much a double-edged sword

A normalization model of visual search predicts single trial human fixations in an object search task

When searching for an object in a scene, how does the brain decide where to look next? Theories of visual search suggest the existence of a global attentional map, computed by integrating bottom-up visual information with top-down, target-specific signals. Where, when and how this integration is performed remains unclear. Here we describe a simple mechanistic model of visual search that is consistent with neurophysiological and neuroanatomical constraints, can localize target objects in complex scenes, and predicts single-trial human behavior in a search task among complex objects. This model posits that target-specific modulation is applied at every point of a retinotopic area selective for complex visual features and implements local normalization through divisive inhibition. The combination of multiplicative modulation and divisive normalization creates an attentional map in which aggregate activity at any location tracks the correlation between input and target features, with relative and controllable independence from bottom-up saliency. We first show that this model can localize objects in both composite images and natural scenes and demonstrate the importance of normalization for successful search. We next show that this model can predict human fixations on single trials, including error and target-absent trials. We argue that this simple model captures non-trivial properties of the attentional system that guides visual search in humans.Comment: 8 figure