Frequency and mortality rate following antimicrobial-resistant bloodstream infections in tertiary-care hospitals compared with secondary-care hospitals

There are few studies comparing proportion, frequency, mortality and mortality rate following antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) infections between tertiary-care hospitals (TCHs) and secondary-care hospitals (SCHs) in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) to inform intervention strategies. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the utility of an offline tool to generate AMR reports and data for a secondary data analysis. We conducted a secondary-data analysis on a retrospective, multicentre data of hospitalised patients in Thailand. Routinely collected microbiology and hospital admission data of 2012 to 2015, from 15 TCHs and 34 SCHs were analysed using the AMASS v2.0 (www.amass.website). We then compared the burden of AMR bloodstream infections (BSI) between those TCHs and SCHs. Of 19,665 patients with AMR BSI caused by pathogens under evaluation, 10,858 (55.2%) and 8,807 (44.8%) were classified as community-origin and hospital-origin BSI, respectively. The burden of AMR BSI was considerably different between TCHs and SCHs, particularly of hospital-origin AMR BSI. The frequencies of hospital-origin AMR BSI per 100,000 patient-days at risk in TCHs were about twice that in SCHs for most pathogens under evaluation (for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [CRAB]: 18.6 vs. 7.0, incidence rate ratio 2.77; 95%CI 1.72–4.43, p0.20). Due to the higher frequencies, all-cause in-hospital mortality rates following hospital-origin AMR BSI per 100,000 patient-days at risk were considerably higher in TCHs for most pathogens (for CRAB: 10.2 vs. 3.6,mortality rate ratio 2.77; 95%CI 1.71 to 4.48, p<0.001; CRPA: 1.6 vs. 0.8; p = 0.020; 3GCREC: 4.0 vs. 2.4, p = 0.009; 3GCRKP, 4.0 vs. 1.8, p<0.001; CRKP: 0.8 vs. 0.3, p = 0.042; and MRSA: 2.3 vs. 1.1, p = 0.023). In conclusion, the burden of AMR infections in some LMICs might differ by hospital type and size. In those countries, activities and resources for antimicrobial stewardship and infection control programs might need to be tailored based on hospital setting. The frequency and in-hospital mortality rate of hospital-origin AMR BSI are important indicators and should be routinely measured to monitor the burden of AMR in every hospital with microbiology laboratories in LMICs

An Assessment of Epidemiology Capacity in a One Health Team at the Provincial Level in Thailand

A multi-sectoral core epidemiology capacity assessment was conducted in provinces that implemented One Health services in order to assess the efficacy of a One Health approach in Thailand. In order to conduct the assessment, four provinces were randomly selected as a study group from a total of 19 Thai provinces that are currently using a One Health approach. As a control group, four additional provinces that never implemented a One Health approach were also sampled. The provincial officers were interviewed on the epidemiologic capacity of their respective provinces. The average score of epidemiologic capacity in the provinces implementing the One Health approach was 66.45%, while the provinces that did not implement this approach earned a score of 54.61%. The epidemiologic capacity of surveillance systems in provinces that utilized the One Health approach earned higher scores in comparison to provinces that did not implement the approach (75.00% vs. 53.13%, p-value 0.13). Although none of the capacity evaluations showed significant differences between the two groups, we found evidence that provinces implementing the One Health approach gained higher scores in both surveillance and outbreak investigation capacities. This may be explained by more efficient capacity when using a One Health approach, specifically in preventing, protecting, and responding to threats in local communities

An Assessment of Epidemiology Capacity in a One Health Team at the Provincial Level in Thailand

A multi-sectoral core epidemiology capacity assessment was conducted in provinces that implemented One Health services in order to assess the efficacy of a One Health approach in Thailand. In order to conduct the assessment, four provinces were randomly selected as a study group from a total of 19 Thai provinces that are currently using a One Health approach. As a control group, four additional provinces that never implemented a One Health approach were also sampled. The provincial officers were interviewed on the epidemiologic capacity of their respective provinces. The average score of epidemiologic capacity in the provinces implementing the One Health approach was 66.45%, while the provinces that did not implement this approach earned a score of 54.61%. The epidemiologic capacity of surveillance systems in provinces that utilized the One Health approach earned higher scores in comparison to provinces that did not implement the approach (75.00% vs. 53.13%, p-value 0.13). Although none of the capacity evaluations showed significant differences between the two groups, we found evidence that provinces implementing the One Health approach gained higher scores in both surveillance and outbreak investigation capacities. This may be explained by more efficient capacity when using a One Health approach, specifically in preventing, protecting, and responding to threats in local communities

Evaluation of the HIV-1 Rapid Recency Assay and Limiting Antigen Avidity Enzyme Immunoassay for HIV Infection Status Interpretation in Long-Term Diagnosed Individuals in Thailand

Background/Objectives: Accurate surveillance of recent HIV infections is crucial for effective epidemic control and timely intervention. The Limited Antigen Avidity Enzyme Immunoassay (LAg-EIA) allows precise differentiation between recent and long-term HIV infections. To enhance accessibility, it has been developted into a point-of-care test, the Asanté™ HIV-1 Rapid Recency® Assay (ARRA), a rapid immunoassay. This study evaluated the performance and false recent rates (FRRs) of the ARRA, interpreted both visually and via a strip reader, in comparison with the LAg-EIA. Methods: Plasma samples were collected from two groups: 634 long-term HIV-infected individuals, identified through routine diagnostic testing, who had not received antiretroviral therapy for over one year, and 224 individuals from high-risk populations. High-risk individuals, including pregnant women, female sex workers, and men who have sex with men, were selected based on behavioral and demographic risk factors. Concordance between the ARRA and LAg-EIA was assessed, and FRRs were calculated for both assays. McNemar’s test was used to evaluate agreement, while Spearman’s rho was applied to assess correlation between the two methods. Results: Visual interpretation of ARRA demonstrated perfect agreement with LAg-Avidity EIA results (FRR = 0.00%), while the strip reader misclassified two specimens as recent infections (FRR = 0.32%). McNemar’s test indicated no significant differences between the methods (p > 0.05). Moderate agreement (Spearman’s rho = 0.434) was observed between ARRA strip reader results and LAg-Avidity EIA optical density values. Among high-risk populations, ARRA misclassified one sample as recent, resulting in an inconsistency rate of 0.45%. Conclusions: This study highlights ARRA’s reliability in identifying long-term infections and its potential as a point-of-care tool. Its rapid results and ease of use make it a valuable asset for effective HIV surveillance, facilitating targeted epidemic monitoring and enhancing public health interventions

Enhanced surveillance for severe pneumonia, Thailand 2010–2015

Abstract Background The etiology of severe pneumonia is frequently not identified by routine disease surveillance in Thailand. Since 2010, the Thailand Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) and US CDC have conducted surveillance to detect known and new etiologies of severe pneumonia. Methods Surveillance for severe community-acquired pneumonia was initiated in December 2010 among 30 hospitals in 17 provinces covering all regions of Thailand. Interlinked clinical, laboratory, pathological and epidemiological components of the network were created with specialized guidelines for each to aid case investigation and notification. Severe pneumonia was defined as chest-radiograph confirmed pneumonia of unknown etiology in a patient hospitalized ≤48 h and requiring intubation with ventilator support or who died within 48 h after hospitalization; patients with underlying chronic pulmonary or neurological disease were excluded. Respiratory and pathological specimens were tested by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for nine viruses, including Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and 14 bacteria. Cases were reported via a secure web-based system. Results Of specimens from 972 cases available for testing during December 2010 through December 2015, 589 (60.6%) had a potential etiology identified; 399 (67.8%) were from children aged < 5 years. At least one viral agent was detected in 394 (40.5%) cases, with the most common of single vial pathogen detected being respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (110/589, 18.7%) especially in children under 5 years. Bacterial pathogens were detected in 341 cases of which 67 cases had apparent mixed infections. The system added MERS-CoV testing in September 2012 as part of Thailand’s outbreak preparedness; no cases were identified from the 767 samples tested. Conclusions Enhanced surveillance improved the understanding of the etiology of severe pneumonia cases and improved the MOPH’s preparedness and response capacity for emerging respiratory pathogens in Thailand thereby enhanced global health security. Guidelines for investigation of severe pneumonia from this project were incorporated into surveillance and research activities within Thailand and shared for adaption by other countries

Establishing Quality Assurance for HIV-1 Rapid Test for Recent Infection in Thailand through the Utilization of Dried Tube Specimens

The present study focuses on establishing the quality assurance of laboratories for recent infections (RTRI) in Thailand. We developed a cold-chain independent method, using fully characterized plasma obtained from the Thai Red Cross Society, and prepared as dried tube specimens (DTS). Twenty microliters of HIV-seronegative, recent, and long-term infected samples were aliquoted into individual tubes and dried at room temperature, 20–30 degrees Celsius, in a biosafety cabinet overnight to ensure optimal preservation. The DTS external quality control and external quality assessment were tested for homogeneity and stability following the ISO/Guide 35 guidelines. The DTS panels were distributed to 48 sites (FY 2022) and 27 sites (FY 2023) across 14 and 9 provinces, respectively, in Thailand. The results from participating laboratories were collected and evaluated for performance. The results were scored, and acceptable performance criteria were defined as the proportion of panels correctly tested, which was set at 100%. The satisfactory performance ranged from 96% to 100% and was not significantly different among the 13 health regions. The developed and implemented DTS panels can be used to monitor the quality of RTRI testing in Thailand

Establishment, Implementation, Initial Outcomes, and Lessons Learned from Recent HIV Infection Surveillance Using a Rapid Test for Recent Infection Among Persons Newly Diagnosed With HIV in Thailand: Implementation Study

Abstract BackgroundA recent infection testing algorithm (RITA) incorporating case surveillance (CS) with the rapid test for recent HIV infection (RTRI) was integrated into HIV testing services in Thailand as a small-scale pilot project in October 2020. ObjectiveWe aimed to describe the lessons learned and initial outcomes obtained after the establishment of the nationwide recent HIV infection surveillance project from April through August 2022. MethodsWe conducted desk reviews, developed a surveillance protocol and manual, selected sites, trained staff, implemented surveillance, and analyzed outcomes. Remnant blood specimens of consenting newly diagnosed individuals were tested using the Asanté33 ResultsTwo hundred and one hospitals in 14 high-burden HIV provinces participated in the surveillance. Of these, 69 reported ≥1 HIV diagnosis during the surveillance period. Of 1053 newly diagnosed cases, 64 (6.1%) were classified as RITA-CS-recent. On multivariate analysis, self-reporting as transgender women (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 7.41, 95% CI 1.59‐34.53) and men who have sex with men (AOR 2.59, 95% CI 1.02‐6.56) compared to heterosexual men, and students compared to office workers or employers (AOR 3.76, 95% CI 1.25‐11.35) were associated with RITA-CS-recent infection. The proper selection of surveillance sites, utilizing existing surveillance tools and systems, and conducting frequent follow-up and supervision visits were the most commonly cited lessons learned to inform the next surveillance phase. ConclusionsRecent HIV infection surveillance can provide an understanding of current epidemiologic trends to inform HIV prevention interventions to interrupt ongoing or recent HIV transmission. The key success factors of the HIV recent infection surveillance in Thailand include a thorough review of the existing HIV testing service delivery system, a streamlined workflow, strong laboratory and health services, and regular communication between sites and the Provincial Health Offices