2 research outputs found

    Reliability, validity, responsiveness, and minimal important change of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Constant-Murley scores in patients with a humeral shaft fracture

    Get PDF
    Background: The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Constant-Murley scores are commonly used instruments. The DASH is patient-reported, and the Constant-Murley combines a clinician-reported and a patient-reported part. For patients with a humeral shaft fracture, their validity, reliability, responsiveness, and minimal important change (MIC) have not been published. This study evaluated the measurement properties of these instruments in patients who sustained a humeral shaft fracture. Methods: The DASH and Constant-Murley instruments were completed 5 times until 1 year after trauma. Pain score, Short Form 36, and EuroQol-5D were completed for comparison. Internal consistency was determined by the Cronbach 伪. Construct and longitudinal validity were evaluated by assessing hypotheses about expected Spearman rank correlations in scores and change scores, respectively, between patient-reported outcome measures (sub)scales. The smallest detectable change (SDC) was calculated. The MIC was determined using an anchor-based approach. The presence of floor and ceiling effects was determined. Results: A total of 140 patients were included. Internal consistency was sufficient for DASH (Cronbach 伪 = 0.96) but was insufficient for Constant-Murley (伪 = 0.61). Construct and longitudinal validity were sufficient for both patient-reported outcome measures (>75% of correlations hypothesized correctly). The MIC and SDC were 6.7 (95% confidence int

    Publisher Correction: Economic evaluation of operative versus nonoperative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture: economic analyses alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study (HUMMER) (European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, (2022), 10.1007/s00068-022-02160-1)

    No full text
    In this article, the order that the authors appeared in the author list was incorrect. The correct order is: Saskia H. Van Bergen1 路 Esther M. M. Van Lieshout1 路 Kiran C. Mahabier1 路 Alexandra J. L. M. Geraerds2 路 Suzanne Polinder2 路 Dennis Den Hartog1 路 Michael H. J. Verhofstad1 路 on behalf of the HUMMER Investigators
    corecore