The microenvironment matters: estrogen deficiency fuels cancer bone metastases

Factors released during osteoclastic bone resorption enhance disseminated breast cancer cell progression by stimulating invasiveness, growth, and a bone-resorptive phenotype in cancer cells. Postmenopausal bone loss may accelerate progression of breast cancer growth in bone, explaining the anticancer benefit of the bone-specific antiresorptive agent zoledronic acid in the postmenopausal setting. Clin Cancer Res; 20(11); 2817-9. ©2014 AACR

Cancer-associated osteoclast differentiation takes a good look in the miR(NA)ror

Tumor-bone cell interactions are critical for the development of metastasis-related osteolytic bone destruction. In this issue of Cancer Cell, Ell and colleagues show how a discrete miRNA network regulates osteoclastogenesis during breast cancer bone metastasis. A signature of upregulated miRNAs may have diagnostic and therapeutic implications for bone metastases

Skeletal muscle Ca2+ mishandling: another effect of bone-to-muscle signaling

Our appreciation of crosstalk between muscle and bone has recently expanded beyond mechanical force-driven events to encompass a variety of signaling factors originating in one tissue and communicating to the other. While the recent identification of new ‘myokines’ has shifted some focus to the role of muscle in this partnership, bone-derived factors and their effects on skeletal muscle should not be overlooked. This review summarizes some previously known mediators of bone-to-muscle signaling and also recent work identifying a new role for bone-derived TGF-β as a cause of skeletal muscle weakness in the setting of cancer-induced bone destruction. Oxidation of the ryanodine receptor/calcium release channel (RyR1) in skeletal muscle occurs via a TGF-β-Nox4-RyR1 axis and leads to calcium mishandling and decreased muscle function. Multiple points of potential therapeutic intervention were identified, from preventing the bone destruction to stabilizing the RYR1 calcium channel. This new data reinforces the concept that bone can be an important source of signaling factors in pathphysiological settings

Molecular mechanisms of bone metastasis and associated muscle weakness

Bone is a preferred site for breast cancer metastasis and leads to pathologic bone loss due to increased osteoclast-induced bone resorption. The homing of tumor cells to the bone depends on the support of the bone microenvironment in which the tumor cells prime the premetastatic niche. The colonization and growth of tumor cells then depend on adaptations in the invading tumor cells to take advantage of normal physiologic responses by mimicking bone marrow cells. This concerted effort by tumor cells leads to uncoupled bone remodeling in which the balance of osteoclast-driven bone resorption and osteoblast-driven bone deposition is lost. Breast cancer bone metastases often lead to osteolytic lesions due to hyperactive bone resorption. Release of growth factors from bone matrix during resorption then feeds a "vicious cycle" of bone destruction leading to many skeletal-related events. In addition to activity in bone, some of the factors released during bone resorption are also known to be involved in skeletal muscle regeneration and contraction. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms that lead to osteolytic breast cancer bone metastases and the potential for cancer-induced bone-muscle cross-talk leading to skeletal muscle weakness

The Role of TGFβ in Bone-Muscle Crosstalk

Purpose of Review The role of bone-derived factors in regulation of skeletal muscle function is an important emerging aspect of research into bone-muscle crosstalk. Implications for this area of research are far reaching and include understanding skeletal muscle weakness in cancer, osteoporosis, cachexia, rare diseases of bone, and aging. Recent Findings Recent research shows that bone-derived factors can lead to changes in the skeletal muscle. These changes can either be anabolic or catabolic, and we focus this review on the role of TGFβ in driving oxidative stress and skeletal muscle weakness in the setting of osteolytic cancer in the bone. Summary The bone is a preferred site for breast cancer metastasis and leads to pathological bone loss. Osteolytic cancer in the bone leads to release of TGFβ from the bone via osteoclast-mediated bone destruction. Our appreciation of crosstalk between the muscle and bone has recently expanded beyond mechanical force-driven events to encompass a variety of signaling factors originating in one tissue and communicating to the other. This review summarizes some previously known mediators of bone-to-muscle signaling and also recent work identifying a new role for bone-derived TGFβ as a cause of skeletal muscle weakness in the setting of osteolytic cancer in the bone. Multiple points of potential therapeutic intervention are discussed

Alkaline phosphatase in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: reassessment of an older biomarker

Since most patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have bone metastases, it is important to understand the potential impact of therapies on prognostic biomarkers, such as ALP. Clinical studies involving mCRPC life-prolonging agents (i.e., sipuleucel-T, abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, and radium-223) have shown that baseline ALP level is prognostic for overall survival, and may be a better prognostic marker for overall survival than prostate-specific antigen in patients with bone-dominant mCRPC. Mechanism of action differences between therapies may partly explain ALP dynamics during treatment. ALP changes can be interpreted within the context of other parameters while monitoring disease activity to better understand the underlying pathology. This review evaluates the current role of ALP in mCRPC

Mechanisms of Muscle Weakness Associated with Bone Metastases

Cancer-associated muscle dysfunction represents a deadly clinical problem, with ca. 80% mortality together with an increased toxicity from cancer treatment.. The normal bone remodeling might be disrupted by tumor cells that metastasize to bone in certain stages of cancer, which results in increased morbidity including muscle weakness. The reason for that muscle weakness might be attributed to the reduction on muscle mass or the reduction of muscle function. In fact, it has been demonstrated that in advanced cancers, it is probably caused by a combination of reductions, quantity and quality of muscle. This review focuses on the mechanisms that bone metastases promote skeletal muscle weakness

Excess TGF-β Induces MMP-9 and SPP-1 Expression in the Skeletal Muscle of Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases: Association with Muscle Dysfunction

https://openworks.mdanderson.org/sumexp23/1052/thumbnail.jp

Influence of Breast Cancer and Metastases on Incidence of Diabete

Purpose: Diabetes increases the risk of subsequent breast cancer. However, the inverse relationship of breast cancer to incident diabetes development is unclear. In preclinical models increased bone turnover due to bone metastases or endocrine therapies impacts insulin secretion. This analysis was conducted to estimate the incidence of diabetes after breast cancer and the influence of metastases and therapeutic agents. Methods: This retrospective case-control study combined data from a large electronic health data exchange and the Indiana State Cancer Registry on breast cancer patients and controls between 2007 and 2017. Primary exposure was presence of breast cancer and bone or non-bone metastases. The primary outcome was frequency of incident diabetes detected by ICD codes, medication use, or laboratory results, compared between breast cancer cases and controls using conditional or ordinary logistic regressions. Results: 36,083 cases and 36,083 matched controls were detected. Incident diabetes was higher in early stage breast cancer (OR 1.17, 95%CI 1.11-1.23, p<0.0001) and metastatic breast cancer (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.25-2.09, p=0.0002), compared to controls. Bone metastases conferred higher odds of both pre-existing (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.63, p=0.0272) and incident diabetes (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.19-2.25, p=0.0021). Endocrine therapy was associated with reduced diabetes (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.83, p=0.002). Anti-resorptives reduced incident diabetes in those with bone metastases (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25-0.78, p=0.005). Conclusion: Breast cancer, especially with metastases, increases subsequent risk of diabetes. As patients with breast cancer live longer, identifying and managing diabetes may impact treatment delivery, cost, survival, and quality of life

Tumor-expressed adrenomedullin accelerates breast cancer bone metastasis

INTRODUCTION: Adrenomedullin (AM) is secreted by breast cancer cells and increased by hypoxia. It is a multifunctional peptide that stimulates angiogenesis and proliferation. The peptide is also a potent paracrine stimulator of osteoblasts and bone formation, suggesting a role in skeletal metastases-a major site of treatment-refractory tumor growth in patients with advanced disease. METHODS: The role of adrenomedullin in bone metastases was tested by stable overexpression in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, which cause osteolytic bone metastases in a standard animal model. Cells with fivefold increased expression of AM were characterized in vitro, inoculated into immunodeficient mice and compared for their ability to form bone metastases versus control subclones. Bone destruction was monitored by X-ray, and tumor burden and osteoclast numbers were determined by quantitative histomorphometry. The effects of AM overexpression on tumor growth and angiogenesis in the mammary fat pad were determined. The effects of AM peptide on osteoclast-like multinucleated cell formation were tested in vitro. A small-molecule AM antagonist was tested for its effects on AM-stimulated ex vivo bone cell cultures and co-cultures with tumor cells, where responses of tumor and bone were distinguished by species-specific real-time PCR. RESULTS: Overexpression of AM mRNA did not alter cell proliferation in vitro, expression of tumor-secreted factors or cell cycle progression. AM-overexpressing cells caused osteolytic bone metastases to develop more rapidly, which was accompanied by decreased survival. In the mammary fat pad, tumors grew more rapidly with unchanged blood vessel formation. Tumor growth in the bone was also more rapid, and osteoclasts were increased. AM peptide potently stimulated bone cultures ex vivo; responses that were blocked by small-molecule adrenomedullin antagonists in the absence of cellular toxicity. Antagonist treatment dramatically suppressed tumor growth in bone and decreased markers of osteoclast activity. CONCLUSIONS: The results identify AM as a target for therapeutic intervention against bone metastases. Adrenomedullin potentiates osteolytic responses in bone to metastatic breast cancer cells. Small-molecule antagonists can effectively block bone-mediated responses to tumor-secreted adrenomedullin, and such agents warrant development for testing in vivo