Geven in Nederland 2009 : Giften, Nalatenschappen, Sponsoring en Vrijwilligerswerk

Voorwoord 5 Samenvatting van de belangrijkste bevindingen 10 Inleiding 18 Door Th.N.M. Schuyt Deel A Bronnen van de bijdragen 25 Hoofdstuk 1 Geven door huishoudens en individuen 27 Door R.H.F.P. Bekkers, P. Wiepking, E. Boonstoppel Hoofdstuk 2 Nalatenschappen 51 Door E.E. Mariani en Th.N.M. Schuyt Hoofdstuk 3 Geven door fondsen 57 Door B.M. Gouwenberg Hoofdstuk 4 Giften en sponsoring door bedrijven 64 Door T.C. de Gilder en Th.N.M. Schuyt Hoofdstuk 5 Geven door goededoelenloterijen 83 Door Th.N.M. Schuyt en B.M. Gouwenberg Hoofdstuk 6 Geven van tijd: vrijwilligerswerk 88 Door R.H.F.P. Bekkers en E.J. Boezeman Geven in Nederland_2009BOEK.indb 7 06-05-2009 17:08:16 8 Deel B Doelen waaraan gegeven wordt 103 Door Th.N.M. Schuyt, B.M. Gouwenberg, R.H.F.P. Bekkers, P. Wiepking, E. Boonstoppel, T.C. de Gilder en E.E. Mariani Hoofdstuk 7 Kerk en levensbeschouwing (religie) 107 Hoofdstuk 8 Gezondheid 114 Hoofdstuk 9 Internationale hulp 119 Hoofdstuk 10 Milieu, natuurbehoud en dierenbescherming 124 Hoofdstuk 11 Onderwijs en onderzoek 129 Hoofdstuk 12 Cultuur 134 Hoofdstuk 13 Sport en recreatie 139 Hoofdstuk 14 Maatschappelijke en sociale doelen (nationaal) 145 Deel C Specials 151 Hoofdstuk 15 Wat en hoe geven jongeren? 153 Door R.H.F.P. Bekkers en P. Wiepking Hoofdstuk 16 Geefgedrag van niet-westerse allochtonen 161 Door C.L. Carabain Hoofdstuk 17 Gebruik van de giftenaftrek in Nederland, 1977-2007 176 Door R.H.F.P. Bekkers en E.E. Mariani Hoofdstuk 18 Fondsenwerving in tijden van crises 186 Door R.H.F.P. Bekkers Bijlage Methodologische verantwoording 197

Foundations in the Netherlands: Toward a Diversified Social Model?

This article describes the history, development, and current position of Dutch foundations. In the past, the philanthropy sector and foundations initiated many nonprofit services in the Netherlands. Along with the growth of the welfare state, philanthropy was sidelined. Due to public funding, the pillarized Dutch nonprofit sector extended strongly. However, despite its large scale it shows a special feature. Most nonprofits are still privately governed institutions although publicly funded. In the 1980s, governmental budget cuts forced the nonprofits to embrace the market as income source. A dualistic model got dominancy or state or market. At the end of the 20th century, however, philanthropy revived and a new philanthropy sector emerged. The article addresses the issue of the role of philanthropy in changing (European) welfare states. Are we experiencing further marketization and privatization—toward a so-called Anglo-Saxon shareholder model—or are we seeing a continuation of the so-called Rhineland, multistakeholder model of government, market, and philanthropy

From Games to Giving: Social Value Orientation Predicts Donations to Noble Causes

The central purpose of the present research is to examine the ability of social value orientation (i.e., prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientation), as measured with methods rooted in game theory (i.e., decomposed games), to predict real-life prosocial behavior. Consistent with hypotheses, results revealed that individual differences in social value orientation are predictive of various donations. Relative to individualists and competitors, prosocials reported to engage in a greater number of donations, especially donations to organizations aimed at helping the poor and the ill. Results are discussed in terms of theory and methodology regarding the individual differences in social value orientation, as well as in terms of societal implications for enhancing donations to noble causes.