2 research outputs found
The internet as an engine of scholarship
- Publication venue
- 'Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)'
- Publication date
- Field of study
No full textUnity in the eye of the beholder? Reasons for decision in theory and practice in the Ontario Works program
- Author
- Because of this many public law scholars assume that judicial review is a more effective mechanism for reforming administrative agencies than it appears to be in practice.
- Canadian courts have stated that they are no longer apex legal interpreters vis-Ă -vis administrative bodies but, as public law scholars often note, courts still struggle with deferring to administrative decision makers.
- Commission for the Review of Social Assistance in Ontario
- David Dyzenhaus
- David Dyzenhaus
- Eubanks
- Field Notes August 2015
- Fleur Johns
- Fleur Johns
- In this way the complexities of the Ontario Works program are similar to those identified in the United Kingdom.
- Jeffrey Manditch Prottas
- Jennifer Raso
- Jerry L Mashaw
- Keith Hawkins
- Liston’s
- Lorne Sossin
- Mariana Valverde
- Mary Liston
- Mary Liston
- Michael Lipsky
- Michael Power
- Mireille Hildebrandt
- Office of the Auditor General of Ontario Annual Report, supra note 66 at 471–2. Together, Ontario Works and Ontario Disability Support Program (the other half of Ontario’s social assistance scheme that assists individuals who are found to be too disabled to work) provide financial and other assistance to almost one million Ontarians. Commission for the Review of Social Assistance in Ontario
- Ontario has followed new public management techniques introduced in other jurisdictions and appears to be pursuing the new wave of new public analytics developments.
- Other scholars have identified similar documentary practices in different institutional contexts.
- Raso
- Roderick Macdonald
- Saskia Sassen
- The Supreme Court of Canada’s tendency to parse reasons from thin decision-making records which appears to be less than deferential, has been the subject of recent comment by some of its justices – that is, Justices Russell Brown and Suzanne Côté – as well as by legal scholars.
- This trend is not entirely new particularly in front-line agencies and in last-resort benefits programs.
- Valverde
- Valverde
- Whether or not letters are sent out following a supplementary benefits decision depends on local office practices.
- Wildeman
- Publication venue
- 'University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)'
- Publication date
- Field of study
No full text
