Risk Factors for the Development of Specific Noncardiovascular Adverse Effects Associated With Amiodarone

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/97170/1/j.1552-4604.1995.tb04072.x.pd

UK-68,798, A Class III Antiarrhythmic Drug with Antifibrillatory Properties

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74787/1/j.1527-3466.1992.tb00244.x.pd

“Escape” of aldosterone production in patients with left ventricular dysfunction treated with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor: Implications for therapy

Despite the findings in randomized trials of a significant effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in reducing morbidity and mortality of patients with symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction, the morbidity and mortality of these patients remains relatively high. One potential strategy to further improve morbidity and mortality in these patients is blockade of aldosterone. Many clinicians have assumed that ACE inhibitors would block both angiotensin II and aldosterone. However, there are data to suggest that aldosterone production may “escape” despite the use of an ACE inhibitor. An escape of aldosterone production has several important consequences, including: sodium retention, potassium and magnesium loss, myocardial collagen production, ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial norepinephrine release, endothelial dysfunction, and a decrease in serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol. Due to the potential importance of these mechanisms, the finding that there is a significant correlation between aldosterone production and mortality in patients with heart failure, as well as evidence that an aldosterone antagonist, spironolactone, when administered to patients with heart failure treated with conventional therapy including an ACE inhibitor results in increased diuresis and symptomatic improvement, an international prospective multicenter study has been organized, the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES Pilot Study), to evaluate the safety of blocking the effects of aldosterone in patients with heart failure treated with an ACE inhibitor.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44631/1/10557_2004_Article_BF00877755.pd

Treating the acute stroke patient as an emergency: current practices and future opportunities

Developments in acute stroke therapy have followed advances in the understanding of the evolving pathophysiology in both ischaemic stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). In ischaemic stroke, rapid reperfusion of the ischaemic penumbra with thrombolysis within 3 h of symptom onset is of proven benefit, but few patients currently receive therapy, mainly due to the short-time window and lack of stroke expertise. In ICH, a recent study indicated that a haemostatic agent can limit ongoing bleeding and improve outcomes when administered within 4 h of stroke onset. These advances in acute stroke therapy underlie the concept that ‘time is brain’ and that urgent intervention can limit cerebral damage. Neuroprotective therapy could offer the prospect of a greater proportion of stroke patients receiving treatment, potentially before imaging and even in the ambulance setting. Virtually all stroke patients would benefit from receiving multidisciplinary care in acute stroke units

Antiarrhythmic versus antifibrillatory actions: Inference from experimental studies

Pathophysiology of the coronary circulation is a major contributor to altering the myocardial substrate, rendering the heart susceptible to the onset of arrhythmias associated with sudden cardiac death. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death has been provided primarily on the basis of trial and error and in some instances based on ill-suited preclinical evaluations. The findings of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) requires a reexamination of the manner in which antiarrhythmic drugs are developed before entering into clinical testing. The major deficiency in this area of experimental investigation has been the lack of animal models that would permit preclinical studies to identify potentially useful or deleterious therapeutic agents. Further, CAST has emphasized the need to distinguish between pharmacologic interventions that suppresses nonlethal disturbances of cardiac rhythm as opposed to those agents capable of preventing lethal ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Preclinical models for the testing of antifibrillatory agents must consider the fact that the superimposition of transient ischemic events on an underlying pathophysiologic substrate makes the heart susceptible to lethal arrhythmias. Proarrhythmic events, not observed in the normal heart, may become manifest only when the myocardial substrate has been altered. We describe a model of sudden cardiac death that may more closely simulate the clinical state in humans who are at risk. The experimental results show a good correlation with clinical data regarding agents known to reduce the incidence of lethal arrhythmias as well as those showing proarrhythmic actions.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/30443/1/0000066.pd