14 research outputs found
Assessing the Dangers of Illicit Networks: Why al-Qaida May Be Less Threatening Than Many Think
New York, Madrid, London – Wie Terroranschläge die Berichterstattung und öffentliche Meinung zu Terrorismus, Innerer Sicherheit und Islamismus beeinflussen
Simplexity: sensemaking, organizing and storytelling for our time
Simplexity is advanced as an umbrella term reflecting sensemaking, organizing and storytelling for our time. People in and out of organizations increasingly find themselves facing novel circumstances that are suffused with dynamic complexity. To make sense through processes of organizing, and to find a plausible answer to the question ‘what is the story?’, requires a fusion of sufficient complexity of thought with simplicity of action, which we call simplexity. This captures the notion that while sensemaking is a balance between thinking and acting, in a new world that owes less to yesterday’s stories and frames, keeping up with the times changes the balance point to clarifying through action. This allows us to see sense (making) more clearly
Of sympathisers and collateral damage. A responsive and supportive audience remains essential to contemporary transnational terrorism
Considering population and war: a critical and neglected aspect of conflict studies
This study analyses the relationship between war and population. The impact of the growth and decline of population on important types of warfare—great power, small power, civil war as well as terrorism—is illustrated, with the objective in each case to be descriptive of risk. I find that population change has a significant impact on each, with the greatest causal impact on small power conflicts, civil war and upon terrorism. I conclude with some reasons for guarded optimism about the incorporation of population as a component of analysis in the discipline of international studies, and for the potential to devise new solutions to prevent conflict