Abnormalities of baroreflex control in heart failure

AbstractThis brief review summarizes abnormalities of arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreflex control of heart rate and sympathetic nerve activity. The potential role of these abnormalities in the development of the neurohumoral excitatory state associated with heart failure is discussed. Major emphasis is placed on the identification of important issues still to be investigated in this area. The potential importance of altered cardiovascular reflexes in the context of the interaction of the patient with heart failure and environmental stresses is discussed. The use of the canine rapid ventricular pacing model of biventricular failure in the investigation of abnormalities of baroreflexes in heart failure is emphasized. Insights obtained from this model should be extended to human investigations

Interaction of Cardiopulmonary and Somatic Reflexes in Humans

with vagal afferents results predominantly in reflex inhibition of efferent sympathetic activity, whereas activation of somatic receptors reflexly increases sympathetic activity to the heart and circulation. Previous studies in experimental animals indicate that there is an important interaction between these excitatory and inhibitory reflexes in the control of the renal circulation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a similar interaction between somatic and cardiopulmonary reflexes in humans. The activity of the cardiopulmonary receptors was altered (reduced) with lower body negative pressure (-5 mm Hg), which causes a decrease in cardiac filling pressure and a small reflex increase in forearm vascular resistance without accompanying changes in arterial pressure. Activation of somatic receptors by isometric handgrip for 2 min at 10 and 20 % of maximum voluntary contraction restulted in reflex vasoconstriction in the nonexercising arm. Lower body negative pressure at-5 mm Hg produced a threefold augmentation in the forearm vasoconstrictor response to isometric handgrip in the nonexercising arm. This increase in resistance was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than the algebraic sum of the increases in resistance resulting from lower body suction alone plus isometric handgrip alone. Furthermore, it occurred despite a greater rise in arterial pressure, which would be expected to decrease foreairm vascular resistance through activation of arteria