2D versus 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation in posterior pelvic fixation: review of the literature on current technology

Purpose Percutaneous sacroiliac (SI) fixation of unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries is a widely accepted procedure. The complex sacral anatomy with narrow osseous corridors for SI screw placement makes this procedure technically challenging. Techniques are constantly evolving as a result of better understanding of the posterior pelvic anatomy. Recently developed tools include fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted navigation, which can be two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D). Our goal is to determine the relevant technical considerations and clinical outcomes associated with these modalities by reviewing the published research. We hypothesize that 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation is safer and superior to its 2D predecessor with respect to lower radiation dose and more accurate SI screw placement. Methods We searched four medical databases to identify English-language studies of 2D and 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation from January 1990 through August 2015. We included articles reporting imaging techniques and outcomes of closed posterior pelvic ring fixation with percutaneous SI screw fixation. Injuries included in the study were sacral fractures (52 patients), sacroiliac fractures (88 patients), lateral compression fractures (20 patients), and anteroposterior compression type pelvic fractures (8 patients). We excluded articles on open reduction of posterior pelvic ring injuries and solely anatomic studies. We then reviewed these studies for technical considerations and outcomes associated with these technologies. Results Six studies were included in our analysis. Results of these studies indicate that 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation is associated with a lower radiation dose and lower rate of screw malpositioning compared with 2D fluoroscopy-based systems. Conclusions It may be advantageous to combine modern imaging modalities such as 3D fluoroscopy with computer-assisted navigation for percutaneous screw fixation in the posterior pelvis

Imaging the Postoperative Spine

Imaging assessment of the postoperative spine is complex and depends on many factors. Postoperative imaging studies evaluate the position of implants, adequacy of decompression, fusion status, and potential complications. This article provides a review of various imaging techniques, with their advantages and disadvantages, for the evaluation of the postoperative spine. It also gives an overview of normal and abnormal postoperative appearances of the spine as seen via various modalities, with an emphasis on postoperative complications

Erratum to Bilateral acetabular fractures treated with delayed total hip arthroplasty [Arthroplasty Today 6 (2020) 236-240]

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.02.005.]

Trends of Venous Thromboembolism After Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States: Analysis From 2011 to 2019

BACKGROUND: In 2011, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons released a Clinical Practice Guideline` that recommended routine venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to examine (1) the change in the incidence of 90-day VTE, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism, (2) the change in the utilization of antithrombotic agents; and (3) the change in the economic burden associated with VTE after total hip arthroplasty (THA) from 2011 to 2019. METHODS: National, administrative claims data from 2011 to 2019 were used to identify patients who underwent primary THA for osteoarthritis. Exclusions entailed liver pathology, coagulopathy, malignancy, or those on prior prescribed blood thinners before THA. Multivariable regression was used, controlling for age and Charlson Comorbidity Index for all years, with 2011 as the reference year. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2019, there was a significant reduction in 90-day VTE rates after THA, with a significant reduction in deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism during this time frame as well. Of the antithrombotic agents prescribed after THA, the utilization of prescribed aspirin significantly increased and that of nonaspirin anticoagulants significantly decreased. Among nonaspirin anticoagulants, the utilization of direct factor Xa inhibitors and direct thrombin inhibitors significantly increased. The added reimbursements associated with VTE after THA significantly decreased during this period. CONCLUSION: Since 2011, the incidence and economic burden associated with VTE after THA have significantly declined. In addition, there has been an increase in prescription aspirin and direct oral anticoagulants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III

The Association of Postoperative Osteoporosis Therapy With Periprosthetic Fracture Risk in Patients Undergoing Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures

BACKGROUND: Displaced femoral neck fractures in older adults are generally treated with hip arthroplasty. One concern following hip arthroplasty is the risk for periprosthetic fractures (PPFs). Most patients who have hip fractures are candidates for antiosteoporotic therapy, but the impact of this treatment on PPFs is unknown. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether patients treated with antiosteoporotic medical therapy had lower odds of PPFs following arthroplasty for hip fracture. METHODS: Patients at least 65 years old who underwent hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures from 2010 to 2020 were identified in a national database. Patients were stratified based on whether they initiated antiosteoporotic therapy within 1 year of hip arthroplasty. Minimum follow-up was 1 year, and maximum follow-up was 10.6 years. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of PPF as determined using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Overall, 2,026 patients who underwent arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture received antiosteoporotic medications within 1 year following surgery (mean follow up 4.8 years; range 1.0 to 10.6 years) and 33,639 patients did not (mean follow up 4.1 years; range 1.1 to 10.3 years). RESULTS: The 10-year cumulative incidence of PPF for patients treated for osteoporosis was 3.88% compared to 5.92% for those who were untreated (P \u3c .001). Adjusting for covariates, patients who received osteoporosis treatment had a significantly lower risk for PPF than those who were untreated (hazard ratio (HR): 0.663; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.465-0.861; P = .038). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that osteoporosis treatment is associated with lower incidence of PPF following hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. Treatment of osteoporosis should be initiated in eligible patients who sustain a femoral neck fracture, especially those who undergo hip arthroplasty

The utility of bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

Background: We describe the features of modern and historical bicruciate-retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants compared with other TKA implant designs, reviewing kinematics, proprioception, operative technique, and clinical results. Methods: We performed a review based on PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane databases from January 1990 to April 2016 using combinations of the following keywords: “bicruciate-retaining arthroplasty,” “bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty,” “bicruciate-retaining TKA,” “kinematics,” “knee kinematics,” and “TKA kinematics.” Results: Four studies have supported the notion that preservation of both cruciate ligaments in TKA preserves more “normal” knee kinematics. BCR implants provide greater proprioceptive performance when compared with posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA implants. However, the operative implantation is more challenging with BCR TKAs, requiring the surgeon to take additional precautions. Overall, there did not seem to be a significant difference in short-term clinical outcomes between the BCR and CR implants. Conclusions: The utility of BCR TKA is still debatable. The literature has not shown clear indications and guidelines for the value and use of this implant. Although kinematics have been shown to mirror the native knee more closely, the clinical outcomes of BCR vs CR TKAs do not differ significantly. Moreover, additional care must be taken when inserting a BCR implant. The anterior cruciate ligament exploration and preservation is more challenging and certain preparation and precautions must take place. Overall, we have not found that BCR implants are significantly superior to CR implants with regards to short term clinical outcomes despite the BCR TKA having improved kinematics and proprioception