Diastolic dysfunction evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance: the value of the combined assessment of atrial and ventricular function

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in the evaluation of diastolic function by a combined assessment of left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) function in a cohort of subjects with various degrees of diastolic dysfunction (DD) detected by echocardiography. METHODS: Forty patients with different stages of DD and 18 healthy controls underwent CMR. Short-axis cine steady-state free precession images covering the entire LA and LV were acquired. Parameters of diastolic function were measured by the analysis of the LV and LA volume/time (V/t) curves and the respective derivative dV/dt curves. RESULTS: At receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the peak of emptying rate A indexed by the LV filling volume with a cut-off of 3.8 was able to detect patients with grade I DD from other groups (area under the curve [AUC] 0.975, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1). ROC analysis showed that LA ejection fraction with a cut-off of ≤36% was able to distinguish controls and grade I DD patients from those with grade II and grade III DD (AUC 0.996, 95% CI 0.92-1, p \u3c 0.001). The isovolumetric pulmonary vein transit ratio with a cut-off of 2.4 allowed class III DD to be distinguished from other groups (AUC 1.0, 95%CI 0.93-1, p \u3c 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of LV and LA V/t curves by CMR may be useful for the evaluation of DD. KEY POINTS: • Combined atrial and ventricular volume/time curves allow evaluation of diastolic function. • Atrial emptying fraction allows distinction between impaired relaxation and restrictive/pseudo-normal filling. • Isovolumetric pulmonary vein transit ratio allows distinction between restrictive and pseudo-normal filling

Usefulness of late gadolinium enhancement MRI combined with stress imaging in predictive significant coronary stenosis in new-diagnosed left ventricular dysfunction

Background To evaluate the accuracy of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and imaging stress test in predicting significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Methods We enrolled 187 consecutive out-patients (61 ± 17 years) with new evidence of depressed (< 45%) ejection fraction and no history of previous heart diseases and absence of Q-waves. All patients underwent coronary angiography (CA) and to LGE-CMR examination to identify ischemic and non-ischemic LGE. All patients underwent stress imaging to determine the presence of myocardial ischemia. Results Ischemic-LGE was found in 83 patients and non-ischemic-LGE in 104. Significant CAD on CA was found in 86/187 patients. Ischemic-LGE showed a specificity of 94%, a sensitivity of 89% and an accuracy of 92% in identifying significant CAD. Imaging stress test was negative in 98/105 patients without CAD, and positive in 42/82 with significant CAD, showing a specificity of 93%, a sensitivity of 51% and an accuracy of 75% in identifying CAD. Combining CMR and stress test imaging, 94 patients had ischemic-LGE pattern and/or positive stress test for ischemia; of these 81/94 had significant CAD on CA and 13 had no CAD. Among the 93 patients with both tests negative, significant CAD was found in 5/93 patients. The combination of LGE and stress respect to only LGE did not improve the diagnostic accuracy (90 vs 92% respectively). Conclusion LGE-CMR had high accuracy in predicting significant CAD in ischemic LV dysfunction or as a bystander in non ischemic dysfunction