1 research outputs found

    āļāļĢāļ“āļĩāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļĢāļˆāļļāđ€āļ™āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļ›āļĨāļēāļ—āļđāļ™āđˆāļēāđāļŠāđˆāđāļ‚āđ‡āļ‡A Case Study to Increase Packing Efficiency of Frozen Tuna Loin

    No full text
    āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļĢāļˆāļļāđ€āļ™āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļ›āļĨāļēāļ—āļđāļ™āđˆāļēāđāļŠāđˆāđāļ‚āđ‡āļ‡āļ‚āļ™āļēāļ”āļšāļĢāļĢāļˆāļļ 6 āļāļīāđ‚āļĨāļāļĢāļąāļĄ/āļ–āļļāļ‡ āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ—āļāļĢāļ“āļĩāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļĄāļĩāļ„āđˆāļēāļ•āđˆāļģāļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ„āđˆāļēāļ„āļēāļ”āļŦāļ§āļąāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ—āļāļģāļŦāļ™āļ” āļ„āļ·āļ­ āļĄāļĩāļ„āđˆāļē 51 āļ–āļļāļ‡/āļ„āļ™/āļŠāļąāđˆāļ§āđ‚āļĄāļ‡ āđ€āļ—āļĩāļĒāļšāļāļąāļš 60 āļ–āļļāļ‡/āļ„āļ™/āļŠāļąāđˆāļ§āđ‚āļĄāļ‡ āļ•āļēāļĄāļĨāļģāļ”āļąāļš āđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āļžāļīāļˆāļēāļĢāļ“āļēāđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ­āļēāļĻāļąāļĒāđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļąāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āđ† āļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē āļŠāļēāđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļĢāļˆāļļāļ•āđˆāļģāļĄāļĩāļ­āļĒāļđāđˆ 3 āļŠāļēāđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļŦāļĨāļąāļ āļ„āļ·āļ­ āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āđ„āļĄāđˆāļŠāļ­āļ”āļ„āļĨāđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļąāļšāđāļœāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨāļīāļ• āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļģāļ™āļēāļāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļĢāļˆāļļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āđāļ•āđˆāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ™āđāļ•āļāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļąāļ™ āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ„āļ­āļ‚āļ§āļ”āđƒāļ™āļ‚āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ•āļ­āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļąāđˆāļ‡āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāļ™āđ‰āļģāļŦāļ™āļąāļāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ—āđ‰āļēāļĒāļŠāļēāļĒāļžāļēāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨāļīāļ• āļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē āļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē āļšāļĢāļīāļĐāļąāļ—āļāļĢāļ“āļĩāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļĨāļ”āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļšāļĢāļĢāļˆāļļāļĨāļ‡āđ„āļ”āđ‰ 1 āļ„āļ™ āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ™āđ‰āļģāļŦāļ™āļąāļāļšāļĢāļĢāļˆāļļ āđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āļāļģāļŦāļ™āļ”āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļĄāļēāļ•āļĢāļāļēāļ™ (Standard Time) āļ—āļĩāđˆāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļĢāļˆāļļāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 46.5 āļ§āļīāļ™āļēāļ—āļĩ/āļ–āļļāļ‡ āļ•āļēāļĄāđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļģāļ™āļēāļ āđāļĨāļ°āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļāļķāļāļ­āļšāļĢāļĄāļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļĨāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļđāļāđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļˆāļēāļāđ€āļ”āļīāļĄ 19.75% āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 12.75% (āļĨāļ”āļĨāļ‡ 35.44%) āļœāļĨāļāļēāļĢāļ—āļ”āļĨāļ­āļ‡āļĒāļąāļ‡āļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē āļ„āļ­āļ‚āļ§āļ”āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ—āđ‰āļēāļĒāļŠāļēāļĒāļžāļēāļ™āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļˆāļēāļāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āļ™āđ‰āļģāļŦāļ™āļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļŠāļąāđˆāļ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄ āļ āļēāļĒāļŦāļĨāļąāļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļąāļšāļ›āļĢāļļāļ‡āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļāļēāļĢāļāļģāļŦāļ™āļ”āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄ āļāļģāļŦāļ™āļ”āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļĄāļēāļ•āļĢāļāļēāļ™āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļĢāļˆāļļāđāļĨāļ°āļāļķāļāļ­āļšāļĢāļĄāļžāļ™āļąāļāļ‡āļēāļ™ āđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļĢāļąāļšāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ‡āļ™āđ‰āļģāļŦāļ™āļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļŠāļąāđˆāļ‡āļšāļ™āļŠāļēāļĒāļžāļēāļ™ āļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāļāļēāļĢāļšāļĢāļĢāļˆāļļāļĄāļĩāļ„āđˆāļēāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™ 55, 59 āđāļĨāļ° 60 āļ–āļļāļ‡/āļ„āļ™/āļŠāļąāđˆāļ§āđ‚āļĄāļ‡ āļ•āļēāļĄāļĨāļģāļ”āļąāļš āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ•āļĢāļ‡āļ•āļēāļĄāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļ āļēāļžāđ€āļ›āđ‰āļēāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļĨāļ”āļ•āđ‰āļ™āļ—āļļāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļœāļĨāļīāļ•āđ„āļ”āđ‰ 648,000 āļšāļēāļ—/āļ§āļąāļ™The packing efficiency of frozen tuna loin packing size 6 kg/pack of the case study company was lower than the target efficiency, which was 51 packs/person/hour based on expectations and perceived performance of 60 packs/person/hour. Considering several management tools, lower packing efficiency was due to 3 main causes: An uncorresponding number of workers to the production plan, different worker packing skills, and a bottleneck in packing weight verification at the end of packing line. In respect of this case study, the company could reduce the number of packing workers by one person without affecting the packing weight. When the standard packing time was set as 46.5 seconds/pack based on the performance of skilled workers and staff who have undergone training, the loss decreased by 35.44%, from 19.75% to 12.75% reduction. It was also found that a bottleneck at the end of packing line was a result of an inappropriate weighing range. After the improvements by recalculating a suitable number of workers, setting a standard packing time, providing training to staff and rearranging packing weights, the packing efficiency augmented to 55, 59 and 60 packs/person/hour respectively which reached the target efficiency and thus could reduce the production cost by 648,000 baht/day
    corecore