16 research outputs found
ΠΡΠΎΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ-Π³Π΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΠ’Π (ΠΠ Π) Π² ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ ΡΠΊΠ²Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ Π₯Π°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠ° (ΠΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡ)
ΠΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠΊΠ²Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ½Π° Π₯Π°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΊΠ° ΠΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ β ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ° Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ-Π³Π΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡ Π² ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ²Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ½Π΅.
Π ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ-Π³Π΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² ΡΠΊΠ²Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ½Π΅, Π² ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠ° β Π³ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠ°Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΡΠ² ΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠ°. Π ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° Π·Π°ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎ-Π³Π΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π³Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ²Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΊΠ²Π°ΠΆΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π³Π΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡ.Final qualifying work includes 85 pages, 13 pictures, 10 tables, 25 sources.
The object of study is production well of Khandinsky license area, Kovykta group of fields.
Purpose β creation of a project for the well logging complex in a production well.
The design process is conducted a qualitative analysis of the previous logging, which carried out fluid intensification activities β hydraulic fracturing. The analysis is projected complex geophysical studies in extracting gas well, subject to the requirements of the well preparation for the geophysical survey
Prognostic value of the modified American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lesion morphology classification for clinical outcome after sirolimus-eluting stent placement (results of the prospective multicenter German Cypher Registry)
The modified American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) lesion morphology classification scheme has prognostic impact for early and late outcomes when bare-metal stents are used. Its value after drug-eluting stent placement is unknown. The predictive value of this lesion morphology classification system in patients treated using sirolimus-eluting stents included in the German Cypher Registry was prospectively examined. The study population included 6,755 patients treated for 7,960 lesions using sirolimus-eluting stents. Lesions were classified as type A, B1, B2, or C. Lesion type A or B1 was considered simple (35.1%), and type B2 or C, complex (64.9%). The combined end point of all deaths, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization was seen in 2.6% versus 2.4% in the complex and simple groups, respectively (p = 0.62) at initial hospital discharge, with a trend for higher rates of myocardial infarction in the complex group. At the 6-month clinical follow-up and after adjusting for other independent factors, the composite of cumulative death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization was nonsignificantly different between groups (11.4% vs 11.2% in the complex and simple groups, respectively; odds ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.8 to 1.46). This was also true for target vessel revascularization alone (8.3% of the complex group, 9.0% of the simple group; odds ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 1.05). In conclusion, the modified ACC/AHA lesion morphology classification system has some value in determining early complications after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Clinical follow-up results at 6 months were generally favorable and cannot be adequately differentiated on the basis of this lesion morphology classification scheme
Sirolimus-eluting stent treatment at high-volume centers confers lower mortality at 6-month follow-up: results from the prospective multicenter German Cypher Registry
BACKGROUND: Studies continue to identify percutaneous coronary intervention procedural volume both at the institutional level and at the operator level as being strongly correlated with outcome. High-volume centers have been defined as those that perform >400 percutaneous coronary intervention procedures per year. The relationship between drug-eluting stent procedural volume and outcome is unknown. We investigated this relationship in the German Cypher Registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: The present analysis included 8201 patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents between April 2002 and September 2005 in 51 centers. Centers that recruited >400 sirolimus-eluting stent patients in this time period were considered high-volume centers; those with 150 to 400 patients were considered intermediate-volume centers; and those with <150 patients were designated as low-volume centers. The primary end point was all death, myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization at 6 months. This end point occurred in 11.3%, 12.1%, and 9.0% of patients in the low-, intermediate-, and high-volume center groups, respectively (P=0.0001). There was no difference between groups in the rate of target-vessel revascularization (P=0.2) or cerebrovascular accidents (P=0.5). The difference in death/myocardial infarction remained significant after adjustment for baseline factors (odds ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 2.59, P<0.001 for low-volume centers; odds ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.29 to 2.21, P<0.001 for intermediate-volume centers). Patient and lesion selection, procedural features, and postprocedural medications differed significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of sirolimus-eluting stent procedures performed on an institutional level was inversely related to death and myocardial infarction but not to target-vessel revascularization at 6-month follow-up. Safety issues are better considered in high-volume centers. These findings have important public health policy implications