45 research outputs found
Object-Oriented Random Forest for High Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Quickbird-2 Imagery
A comparative study of segmentation quality for multi-resolution segmentation and watershed transform
Ensemble-based canonical correlation forest (CCF) for land use and land cover classification using sentinel-2 and Landsat OLI imagery
Performance evaluation of rotation forest for svm-based recursive feature elimination using hyperspectral imagery
Semi-Automatic Building Extraction from WorldView-2 Imagery Using Taguchi Optimization
Due to the complex spectral and spatial structures of remotely sensed images, the delineation of land use/land cover classes using conventional approaches is a challenging task. This article tackles the problem of seeking optimal parameters of multi-resolution segmentation for a classification
task using WorldView-2 imagery. Taguchi optimization was applied to search optimal parameters using the plateau objective function (<small>POF</small>) and quality rate (<small>Qr</small>) as fitness criteria. Analysis of variance was also used to estimate the contributions
of the parameters for POF and Qr, separately. The scale parameter was the most effective one, with contribution levels of 87.45% and 56.87% for POF and Qr, respectively. Linear regression and support-vector regression methods were used to predict the results of the experiment. Test results
revealed that Taguchi optimization was more effective than linear regression and support-vector regression for predicting POF and Qr values.</jats:p
The use of logistic model tree (LMT) for pixel- and object-based classifications using high-resolution WorldView-2 imagery
Logistic model tree (LMT), a new method integrating standard decision tree (DT) induction and linear logistic regression algorithm in a single tree, have been recently proposed as an alternative to DT-based learning algorithms. In this study, the LMT was applied in the context of pixel- and object-based classifications using high-resolution WorldView-2 imagery, and its performance was compared with C4.5, random forest and Adaboost. Results of the study showed that the LMT generally produced more accurate classification results than the other methods for both pixel- and object-based classifications. The improvement in classification accuracy reached to 3% in pixel-based and 5% in object-based classifications. It was also estimated that the LMT algorithm produced the most accurate results considering the allocation and overall disagreement errors. Based on the Wilcoxon’s Signed-Ranks tests, the performance differences between the LMT and the other methods were statistically significant for both pixel- and object-based image classifications
