Disassortativity in Biological and Supply Chain Networks

Network science has allowed researchers to model complex real world systems as networks in order to identify non trivial topological patterns. Degree correlations (or assortativity) is one such non trivial topological property, which indicates the extent to which nodes with similar degrees tend to pair up with each other. Biological networks have long been known to display anti-degree correlations (disassortativity), where highly connected nodes tend to avoid linking with each other. However, the mechanism underlying this structural organisation remain not well understood. Recent work has suggested that in some instances, disassortativity can be observed merely as a model artefact due to simple network representations not allowing multiple link formations between the node pairs. This phenomena is known as structural disassortativity. In this paper, we analyse datasets from two distinct classes of networks, namely; man made supply chain networks and naturally occurring biological networks. We examine whether the observed disassortativity in these networks are structurally induced or owing to some external process. Degree preserving randomisation is used to generate an ensemble of null models for each network. Comparison of the degree correlation profiles of each network, against that of their degree preserving randomised counterparts reveal whether the observed disassortativity in each network is of structural nature or not. We find that in all biological networks, the observed disassortativity is of structural nature, meaning their disassortative nature can be fully explained by their respective degree distributions, without attribution to any underlying mechanism which drives the system towards disassortativity. However, in supply chain networks, we find one case where disassortativity is structurally induced and in other cases where it is mechanistically driven. We conclude by emphasizing on ruling out structural disassortativity in future research, prior to investigating mechanisms underlying disassortativity in networks

Collective Irrationality and Positive Feedback

Recent experiments on ants and slime moulds have assessed the degree to which they make rational decisions when presented with a number of alternative food sources or shelter. Ants and slime moulds are just two examples of a wide range of species and biological processes that use positive feedback mechanisms to reach decisions. Here we use a generic, experimentally validated model of positive feedback between group members to show that the probability of taking the best of options depends crucially on the strength of feedback. We show how the probability of choosing the best option can be maximized by applying an optimal feedback strength. Importantly, this optimal value depends on the number of options, so that when we change the number of options the preference of the group changes, producing apparent “irrationalities”. We thus reinterpret the idea that collectives show "rational" or "irrational" preferences as being a necessary consequence of the use of positive feedback. We argue that positive feedback is a heuristic which often produces fast and accurate group decision-making, but is always susceptible to apparent irrationality when studied under particular experimental conditions

Let’s BEE Scientists: Youth co-creating ecological science on pollinators

To address the global challenge of insect pollinator declines, we need interdisciplinary action by empowered youth that understand ecological diversity. Increasing this informed environmental empathy requires science curriculum that incorporates creative approaches to learning in nature and with community. Designing curriculum using co-designed citizen science can improve scientific literacy alongside science communication, whilst empowering students as co-researchers. Through a participatory action research PhD in entomology, we developed two interdisciplinary school curriculums (primary and secondary). We aimed to foster understanding of local pollinators and the scientific method using creative pedagogies. High school students co-designed an experiment to understand flower preferences of wild pollinators in their own backyards. They created artificial flowers to test their hypotheses based on observations in nature. All students collected data which the high school students interpreted. Students also created visual and musical science communication projects based on their findings and experiences. This process inspired student reflections on the intersection between ‘scientists’ and ‘artists’. Students’ understandings of pollinators expanded to include a diversity of insects for whom they developed greater empathy. This resulted in students creatively expressing a passion for science as a means of understanding the nature on their doorstep and proposing practical actions to conserve pollinators

Modelling daily weight variation in honey bee hives

A quantitative understanding of the dynamics of bee colonies is important to support global efforts to improve bee health and enhance pollination services. Traditional approaches focus either on theoretical models or data-centred statistical analyses. Here we argue that the combination of these two approaches is essential to obtain interpretable information on the state of bee colonies and show how this can be achieved in the case of time series of intra-day weight variation. We model how the foraging and food processing activities of bees affect global hive weight through a set of ordinary differential equations and show how to estimate reliable ranges for the ten parameters of this model from measurements on a single day. Our analysis of 10 hives at different times shows that crucial indicators of the health of honey bee colonies are estimated robustly and fall in ranges compatible with previously reported results. The indicators include the amount of food collected (foraging success) and the number of active foragers, which may be used to develop early warning indicators of colony failure.Comment: 26 pages with 9 figure

Urbanisation generates multiple trait syndromes for terrestrial animal taxa worldwide

Cities can host significant biological diversity. Yet, urbanisation leads to the loss of habitats, species, and functional groups. Understanding how multiple taxa respond to urbanisation globally is essential to promote and conserve biodiversity in cities. Using a dataset encompassing six terrestrial faunal taxa (amphibians, bats, bees, birds, carabid beetles and reptiles) across 379 cities on 6 continents, we show that urbanisation produces taxon-specific changes in trait composition, with traits related to reproductive strategy showing the strongest response. Our findings suggest that urbanisation results in four trait syndromes (mobile generalists, site specialists, central place foragers, and mobile specialists), with resources associated with reproduction and diet likely driving patterns in traits associated with mobility and body size. Functional diversity measures showed varied responses, leading to shifts in trait space likely driven by critical resource distribution and abundance, and taxon-specific trait syndromes. Maximising opportunities to support taxa with different urban trait syndromes should be pivotal in conservation and management programmes within and among cities. This will reduce the likelihood of biotic homogenisation and helps ensure that urban environments have the capacity to respond to future challenges. These actions are critical to reframe the role of cities in global biodiversity loss.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Multinational evaluation of genetic diversity indicators for the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : Kobo forms and scripts used to collect and analyse data are available on the GitHub repository https://github.com/AliciaMstt/GeneticIndicators (Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10620306).The data that support the findings of this study are available in DRYAD (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bk3j9kdkm). Some data that could lead to the geographic identification of endangered species have been obscured.Under the recently adopted Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, 196 Parties committed to reporting the status of genetic diversity for all species. To facilitate reporting, three genetic diversity indicators were developed, two of which focus on processes contributing to genetic diversity conservation: maintaining genetically distinct populations and ensuring populations are large enough to maintain genetic diversity. The major advantage of these indicators is that they can be estimated with or without DNA-based data. However, demonstrating their feasibility requires addressing the methodological challenges of using data gathered from diverse sources, across diverse taxonomic groups, and for countries of varying socio-economic status and biodiversity levels. Here, we assess the genetic indicators for 919 taxa, representing 5271 populations across nine countries, including megadiverse countries and developing economies. Eighty-three percent of the taxa assessed had data available to calculate at least one indicator. Our results show that although the majority of species maintain most populations, 58% of species have populations too small to maintain genetic diversity. Moreover, genetic indicator values suggest that IUCN Red List status and other initiatives fail to assess genetic status, highlighting the critical importance of genetic indicators.Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas; Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología; Vetenskapsrådet.http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/elehj2024Zoology and EntomologySDG-15:Life on lan

Multinational evaluation of genetic diversity indicators for the Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

Under the recently adopted Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, 196 Parties committed to reporting the status of genetic diversity for all species. To facilitate reporting, three genetic diversity indicators were developed, two of which focus on processes contributing to genetic diversity conservation: maintaining genetically distinct populations and ensuring populations are large enough to maintain genetic diversity. The major advantage of these indicators is that they can be estimated with or without DNA‐based data. However, demonstrating their feasibility requires addressing the methodological challenges of using data gathered from diverse sources, across diverse taxonomic groups, and for countries of varying socio‐economic status and biodiversity levels. Here, we assess the genetic indicators for 919 taxa, representing 5271 populations across nine countries, including megadiverse countries and developing economies. Eighty‐three percent of the taxa assessed had data available to calculate at least one indicator. Our results show that although the majority of species maintain most populations, 58% of species have populations too small to maintain genetic diversity. Moreover, genetic indicator values suggest that IUCN Red List status and other initiatives fail to assess genetic status, highlighting the critical importance of genetic indicators