Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) Allows Monitoring the Barnase-Barstar Complex In Vivo

Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) seems to be a promising biophysical technique to study protein–protein interactions within living cells due to a very specific reaction of bioluminescence that essentially decreases the background of other cellular components and light-induced destruction of biomacromolecules. An important direction of the development of this technique is the study of known strong protein–protein complexes in vivo and the estimation of an average distance between chromophores of the donor and acceptor. Here, we demonstrate an in vivo interaction between barnase fused with luciferase (from Renilla reniformis, RLuc) and barstar fused with EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein of Aequorea victoria) monitored by BRET. The distance between the luciferase and EGFP chromophores within the complex has been evaluated as equal to (56 ± 2) Å

Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) Allows Monitoring the Barnase-Barstar Complex In Vivo

Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) seems to be a promising biophysical technique to study protein–protein interactions within living cells due to a very specific reaction of bioluminescence that essentially decreases the background of other cellular components and light-induced destruction of biomacromolecules. An important direction of the development of this technique is the study of known strong protein–protein complexes in vivo and the estimation of an average distance between chromophores of the donor and acceptor. Here, we demonstrate an in vivo interaction between barnase fused with luciferase (from Renilla reniformis, RLuc) and barstar fused with EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein of Aequorea victoria) monitored by BRET. The distance between the luciferase and EGFP chromophores within the complex has been evaluated as equal to (56 ± 2) Å

Back to GroEL-Assisted Protein Folding: GroES Binding-Induced Displacement of Denatured Proteins from GroEL to Bulk Solution

The main events in chaperone-assisted protein folding are the binding and ligand-induced release of substrate proteins. Here, we studied the location of denatured proteins previously bound to the GroEL chaperonin resulting from the action of the GroES co-chaperonin in the presence of Mg-ATP. Fluorescein-labeled denatured proteins (α-lactalbumin, lysozyme, serum albumin, and pepsin in the presence of thiol reagents at neutral pH, as well as an early refolding intermediate of malate dehydrogenase) were used to reveal the effect of GroES on their interaction with GroEL. Native electrophoresis has demonstrated that these proteins tend to be released from the GroEL-GroES complex. With the use of biotin- and fluorescein-labeled denatured proteins and streptavidin fused with luciferase aequorin (the so-called streptavidin trap), the presence of denatured proteins in bulk solution after GroES and Mg-ATP addition has been confirmed. The time of GroES-induced dissociation of a denatured protein from the GroEL surface was estimated using the stopped-flow technique and found to be much shorter than the proposed time of the GroEL ATPase cycle

Reconstruction of the Steroid 1(2)-Dehydrogenation System from <i>Nocardioides simplex</i> VKM Ac-2033D in <i>Mycolicibacterium</i> Hosts

Microbial 1(2)-dehydrogenation of 3-ketosteroids is an important basis for the production of many steroid pharmaceuticals and synthons. When using the wild-type strains for whole cell catalysis, the undesirable reduction of the 20-carbonyl group, or 1(2)-hydrogenation, was observed. In this work, the recombinant strains of Mycolicibacterium neoaurum and Mycolicibacterium smegmatis were constructed with blocked endogenous activity of 3-ketosteroid-9α-hydroxylase, 3-ketosteroid-1(2)-dehydrogenase (3-KSD), and expressing 3-KSD encoded by the gene KR76_27125 (kstD2NS) from Nocardioides simplex VKM Ac-2033D. The in vivo activity of the obtained recombinant strains against phytosterol, 6α-methyl-hydrocortisone, and hydrocortisone was studied. When using M. smegmatis as the host strain, the 1(2)-dehydrogenation activity of the constructed recombinant cells towards hydrocortisone was noticeably higher compared to those on the platform of M. neoaurum. A comparison of the strengths of inducible acetamidase and constitutive hsp60 promoters in M. smegmatis provided comparable results. Hydrocortisone biotransformation by M. smegmatis BD/pMhsp_k expressing kstD2NS resulted in 95.4% prednisolone yield, and the selectivity preferred that for N. simplex. Mycolicibacteria showed increased hydrocortisone degradation at 35 °C compared to 30 °C. The presence of endogenous steroid catabolism in Mycolicibacterium hosts does not seem to confer an advantage for the functioning of KstD2NS. The results allow for the evaluation of the prospects for the development of simple technological methods for the selective 1(2)-dehydrogenation of 3-ketosteroids by growing bacterial cells

In Vivo Incorporation of Photoproteins into GroEL Chaperonin Retaining Major Structural and Functional Properties

The incorporation of photoproteins into proteins of interest allows the study of either their localization or intermolecular interactions in the cell. Here we demonstrate the possibility of in vivo incorporating the photoprotein Aequorea victoria enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) or Gaussia princeps luciferase (GLuc) into the tetradecameric quaternary structure of GroEL chaperonin and describe some physicochemical properties of the labeled chaperonin. Using size-exclusion and affinity chromatography, electrophoresis, fluorescent and electron transmission microscopy (ETM), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), we show the following: (i) The GroEL14-EGFP is evenly distributed within normally divided E. coli cells, while gigantic undivided cells are characterized by the uneven distribution of the labeled GroEL14 which is mainly localized close to the cellular periplasm; (ii) EGFP and likely GLuc are located within the inner cavity of one of the two GroEL chaperonin rings and do not essentially influence the protein oligomeric structure; (iii) GroEL14 containing either EGFP or GLuc is capable of interacting with non-native proteins and the cochaperonin GroES