iRGD peptide conjugation potentiates intraperitoneal tumor delivery of paclitaxel with polymersomes

Polymersomes are versatile nanoscale vesicles that can be used for cytoplasmic delivery of payloads. Recently, we demonstrated that pH-sensitive polymersomes exhibit an intrinsic selectivity towards intraperitoneal tumor lesions. A tumor homing peptide, iRGD, harbors a cryptic C-end Rule (CendR) motif that is responsible for neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) binding and for triggering extravasation and tumor penetration of the peptide. iRGD functionalization increases tumor selectivity and therapeutic efficacy of systemic drug-loaded nanoparticles in many tumor models. Here we studied whether intraperitoneally administered paclitaxel-loaded iRGD-polymersomes show improved efficacy in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis. First, we demonstrated that the pH-sensitive polymersomes functionalized with RPARPAR (a prototypic CendR peptide) or iRGD internalize in the cells that express NRP-1, and that internalized polymersomes release their cargo inside the cytosol. CendR-targeted polymersomes loaded with paclitaxel were more cytotoxic on NRP-1-positive cells than on NRP-1-negative cells. In mice bearing peritoneal tumors of gastric (MKN-45P) or colon (CT26) origin, intraperitoneally administered RPARPAR and iRGD-polymersomes showed higher tumor-selective accumulation and penetration than untargeted polymersomes. Finally, iRGD-polymersomes loaded with paclitaxel showed improved efficacy in peritoneal tumor growth inhibition and in suppression of local dissemination compared to the pristine paclitaxel-polymersomes or Abraxane. Our study demonstrates that iRGD-functionalization improves efficacy of paclitaxel-polymersomes for intraperitoneal treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis

Poor immune reconstitution after four or five major HLA antigens mismatched T cell-depleted allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation

Two adults with primary liver cancer underwent liver transplantation from 5/6 and 4/6 major HLA-antigen mismatched unrelated donors. They were then conditioned with 4 × 2 Gy of total lymphoid irradiation, 120 mg/kg cyclophosphamide, 7·5 Gy total body irradiation and anti-T cell antibodies. Thereafter, the patients received T cell-depleted autologous: unrelated mismatched bone marrow in a proportion of 0·5:3·0 and 0·35:1·1 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, respectively. After allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), both became mixed chimeras, as determined with polymerase chain reaction amplification of variable number tandem repeats from DNA obtained from CD3+, CD19+ and CD45+ magnetic bead-separated cells. Due to a reduction in donor T cells, the first patient was given 105 donor T cells/kg and became a complete donor chimera within 3 months. The second patient rejected all donor cells within 1 month after ASCT. Leucocytes normalized in both patients within 1 month. CD8+ cells normalized after 4 and 2 months in the two patients, respectively. However, CD4+, CD56+ and CD19+ cells remained low, except for a transient increase in patient 2. Lymphocyte responses to mitogens were negative in patient 1 from 1 to 5 months after ASCT. This patient also showed an oligoclonal pattern of the B cell repertoire, performed by CDR3 spectratyping. Epstein–Barr virus DNA in lymphocytes increased by 4–5 log in both patients. Prior to ASCT, recipients and donors were mutually reactive in mixed lymphocyte cultures (MLC). In the first patient, who became a complete donor chimera, the chimera cells showed no response to recipient or donor, but a positive response to third party. In the other patient, recipient cells reacted vigorously against donor lymphocytes at the time of rejection. Both patients suffered from overwhelming bacterial, fungal and viral infections, and died of pneumonia 5 and 3 months after ASCT, respectively. To conclude, with a major HLA-mismatch barrier, stable mixed chimerism seems difficult to achieve. The first patient became a full donor chimera and the second one rejected the graft. Both suffered from immune incompetence