Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand Version of the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH-JSSH) questionnaire

AbstractBackgroundThe Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire is a region-specific, selfadministered questionnaire, which consists of a disability/symptom (QuickDASH-DS) scale, and the same two optional modules, the work (DASH-W) and the sport/music (DASHSM) modules, as the DASH. After the Japanese version of DASH (DASH-JSSH) was cross-culturally adapted and developed, we made the Japanese version of QuickDASH (QuickDASH-JSSH) by extracting 11 out of 30 items of the DASH-JSSH regarding disability/symptoms. The purpose of this study was to test the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of QuickDASH-JSSH.MethodsA series of 72 patients with upper extremity disorders completed the QuickDASH-JSSH, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. Thirty-eight of the patients were reassessed for test–retest reliability 1 or 2weeks later. Reliability was investigated by the reproducibility and internal consistency. To analyze the validity, a principal component analysis and the correlation coefficients between the QuickDASH-JSSH and the SF-36 were obtained. The responsiveness was examined by calculating the standardized response mean (SRM; mean change/SD) and effect size (mean change/SD of baseline value) after carpal tunnel release of the 17 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.ResultsCronbach’s alpha coefficient in the QuickDASH-DS was 0.88. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the same was 0.82. The unidimensionality of the QuickDASH-DS was confirmed. The correlation coefficients between the QuickDASH-DS and the DASH-DS, DASH-W, or the DASH-SM were 0.92, 0.81, or 0.76, respectively. The correlation coefficients between the QuickDASH-DS score and the subscales of the SF-36 ranged from −0.29 to −0.73. The correlation coefficient between the QuickDASH-DS score and the VAS for pain was 0.52. The SRM/effect size of QuickDASHDS was −0.54/−0.37, which indicated moderate sensitivity.ConclusionThe Japanese version of QuickDASH has equivalent evaluation capacities to the original QuickDASH

Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Instrument

AbstractBackgroundThe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Instrument (CTSI) is a disease-specific, self-administered questionnaire that consists of a symptom severity scale (SS) and a functional status scale (FS). The CTSI was cross-culturally adapted and developed by the Impairment Evaluation Committee, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand (JSSH). The purpose of this study was to test the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the CTSI (CTSI-JSSH).MethodsA consecutive series of 87 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome completed the CTSI-JSSH, the JSSH version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH-JSSH), and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Seventy-two of the patients were reassessed for test–retest reliability 1 or 2 weeks later. Reliability was investigated by the reproducibility and the internal consistency. To analyze the validity, a factor analysis (principal axis factoring) of the CTSI-JSSH and the correlation coefficients between the CTSI-JSSH and DASH-JSSH were obtained. The responsiveness was examined by calculating the standardized response mean (SRM; mean change/SD) and effect size (mean change/SD of baseline value) after carpal tunnel release in 42 patients.ResultsCronbach’s alpha coefficients for the CTSI-JSSH-SS and the CTSI-JSSH-FS were 0.84 and 0.90, respectively, and the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.82 and 0.83, respectively. The unidimensionality of the CTSI-JSSH-SS was barely confirmed; the unidimensionality of the CTSI-JSSH-FS was confirmed. The correlation coefficients between the CTSI-JSSH-FS and the CTSI-JSSH-SS or DASH-JSSH were 0.58 and 0.80, respectively. The correlation coefficient between the CTSI-JSSH-SS and DASH-JSSH was 0.54. The correlation coefficients between the subscales of SF-36 and the CTSI-JSSH-SS or the CTSI-JSSH-FS ranged from -0.23 to -0.66 and from -0.19 to -0.63, respectively. The SRMs/effect sizes of the CTSI-JSSH-SS and the CTSI-JSSH-FS were -0.85/-0.99 and -0.70/-0.61, which indicated that they were more than moderately sensitive.ConclusionsThe CTSI-JSSH has sufficient reliability, validity, and responsiveness to assess the health status in carpal tunnel syndrome

Three-dimensional Analysis of the Attachment and Path of the Transverse Carpal Ligament

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe and evaluate the detailed anatomic locations and areas of ligamentous attachments and paths of the transverse carpal ligament (TCL) on a three-dimensional (3-D) surface model. Methods: Ten fresh-frozen cadaver wrists were used to dissect and identify the TCL. Their ligament at-tachments and whole bone surfaces were digitized three-dimensionally and their areas evaluated. The attachments of each ligament were represented in a model combining CT surfaces overlaid by a digit-ized 3-D surface, and were also visually depicted with a different color for each on 3-D images of the bones. Results: The TCL was found to be composed of two or three discrete ligaments. Both the trapezium-hook of hamate ligament and the trapezium-pisiform ligament were identified in all ten specimens. The scaphoid-pisiform ligament was found in only two of the ten specimens. The average areas of the at-tachments of the TCL were 42.7 mm2 on the trapezium, 30.0 mm2 on the hook of hamate, 21.6 mm2 on the pisiform, and 12.7 mm2 on the scaphoid. Conclusions: The anatomic 3-D attachment sites of the TCL were visually shown qualitatively, and their areas quantified. This 3-D information offers further knowledge and understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics of the TCL. It could also help in the accurate assessment of radiographic images and treatment of various wrist injuries and diseases when performing such procedures as carpal tunnel re-lease, Guyon’s canal release, trapeziectomy, hook of hamate excision, or arthroscopy