Health Care Resource Use Among Patients with Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in Japan, 2017–2019

ABSTRACT: Background: First-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy for advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was introduced in Japan in February 2017. Limited information is available since that time regarding health care resource use for NSCLC in Japan, where the hospitalization burden is high. Objective: We evaluated health care resource use from first- through third-line systemic anticancer therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC included in a multicenter, retrospective chart review study. Methods: Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older with unresectable locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC with no known actionable genomic alteration who initiated first-line systemic anticancer therapy from July 1, 2017, to December 20, 2018, at 23 Japanese hospitals. We calculated the percentage of patients with a record of each resource used, the total number of each resource, and the resource use per 100 patient-weeks of follow-up from initiation of first-, second-, and third-line therapy, overall and by the 3 most common regimen categories, namely, ICI monotherapy, platinum-doublet chemotherapy (without concomitant ICI), and nonplatinum cytotoxic regimens (nonplatinum). Study follow-up ended September 30, 2019. Results: Among 1208 patients (median age = 70 years; 975 [81%] men), 463 patients (38%) received ICI monotherapy, 647 (54%) received platinum-doublet chemotherapy, and 98 (8%) received nonplatinum regimens as first-line therapy. During the study, 621 (51%) patients initiated second-line, and 281 (23%) initiated third-line therapy. The majority of patients experienced ≥1 hospitalization (76%–94%) and ≥1 outpatient visit (85%–90%) during each therapy line. The number of hospitalizations increased from 6.5 per 100 patient-weeks in first-line to 8.0 per 100 patient-weeks in third-line. During first-line therapy, the number of hospitalizations per 100 patient-weeks were 4.8, 8.4, and 6.5 for patients receiving ICI monotherapy, platinum-doublet chemotherapy, and nonplatinum regimens, respectively, and the percentages of hospitalizations categorized as attributable to NSCLC treatment administration (no surgery, procedure, treatment of metastasis, or palliative lung radiation) were 64%, 77%, and 73%, respectively. The number of outpatient visits increased from 43.0 per 100 patient-weeks in first-line to 51.4 per 100 patient-weeks in third-line therapy. During first-line therapy, outpatient visits per 100 patient-weeks were 41.0, 46.7, and 33.0 for patients receiving ICI monotherapy, platinum-doublet chemotherapy, and nonplatinum regimens, respectively, and the percentages of outpatient visits for infusion therapy were 48%, 34%, and 36%, respectively. Conclusions: The results of this study, although solely descriptive, showed differing patterns of health care resource use during first-line therapy among the 3 common systemic anticancer therapy regimens for advanced NSCLC in Japan and suggest that further research is needed to investigate these apparent differences by treatment regimen

Effectiveness and Safety of Atezolizumab Monotherapy in Previously Treated Japanese Patients With Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent NSCLC: A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study (J-TAIL)

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in previously treated patients with NSCLC have been established in the registrational phase 3 OAK trial. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of atezolizumab monotherapy in a large real-world cohort to confirm the reproducibility of the results of the registrational trial. Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, single-arm observational study. Consecutive patients with previously treated NSCLC scheduled to receive atezolizumab monotherapy were enrolled. The primary end point was the 18-month overall survival (OS) rate. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and immune-related AEs was evaluated. Results: Overall, 1002 patients were included in the safety analysis set and 1000 in the full analysis set. Median follow-up was 11.5 months. Of the full analysis set, 62% were ineligible for the OAK trial (OAK-unlike subpopulation). The 18-month OS rate was 41.1%, with a median OS of 13.0 months (95% confidence interval: 12.2–15.1). The 18-month OS rate was 49.4% and 36.1% in OAK-like and OAK-unlike subpopulations, respectively; that in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 2 was 14.3%. The incidence of AEs overall, in the OAK-like, and OAK-unlike subpopulations was 43.9%, 46.2%, and 42.5%; that of immune-related AEs was 19.0%, 20.1%, and 18.3%, respectively. Conclusions: The findings suggest that atezolizumab may be effective and safe for previously treated patients with NSCLC in real-world settings; however, atezolizumab administration should be considered carefully regarding the benefit–risk balance for the OAK-unlike subpopulation, especially in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 2