Platinum‐combination chemotherapy with or without immune‐checkpoint inhibitor in patients with postoperative recurrent non‐small cell lung cancer previously treated with adjuvant platinum‐doublet chemotherapy: A multicenter retrospective study

Abstract Background Rechallenge with platinum‐combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after disease progression on platinum‐combination chemotherapy occasionally leads to a favorable response. The efficacy and safety of platinum‐combination chemotherapy with or without immune‐checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for patients with recurrent NSCLC after surgery followed by adjuvant platinum‐doublet chemotherapy remains uncertain. Methods Patients who relapsed after surgery plus adjuvant platinum‐doublet chemotherapy and received platinum‐combination chemotherapy with or without ICI between April 2011 and March 2021 at four Nippon Medical School hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Results Among 177 patients who received adjuvant platinum‐doublet chemotherapy after surgery, a total of 30 patients who received platinum‐combination rechemotherapy with or without ICI after relapse were included in this study. Seven patients received ICI‐combined chemotherapy. The median disease‐free survival (DFS) after surgery was 13.6 months. The objective response rate and disease‐control rate were 46.7% and 80.0%, respectively. The median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 10.2 and 37.5 months, respectively. Patients with longer DFS (≥12 months) had a better prognosis than others. The most common grade ≥3 toxicity associated with this treatment was neutropenia (33%). Grade ≥3 immune‐related adverse events were pneumonitis (14%) and colitis (14%). Treatment‐related deaths did not occur in this study. Conclusion Platinum‐combination chemotherapy with or without ICI for patients with postoperative recurrent NSCLC who previously received adjuvant platinum‐doublet chemotherapy was effective and safe. In particular, this therapy may be promising for patients with longer DFS

Osimertinib early dose reduction as a risk to brain metastasis control in EGFR‐mutant non‐small cell lung cancer

Abstract Background The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is a risk factor associated with brain metastases (BMs) in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of osimertinib early dose reduction on BM worsening. Methods We retrospectively analyzed EGFR‐mutant NSCLC patients treated with osimertinib as first‐line treatment between August 2018 and October 2021. To evaluate the impact of osimertinib early dose reduction, we performed a landmark analysis of patients who achieved disease control at 4 months. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether the osimertinib dose was reduced or not, within 4 months after the start of treatment. We evaluated the time to BMs onset or progression, progression‐free survival, and overall survival. Results In total, 62 NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations were analyzed. Thirteen patients experienced early dose reduction of osimertinib treatment. Seven patients received osimertinib 40 mg daily, and six received 80 mg every other day. The most common reason for dose reduction was gastrointestinal toxicity (n = 4), followed by skin rashes (n = 3). The time to BMs onset or progression was significantly shorter in patients who experienced early dose reduction than in those who continued regular treatment (Hazard ratio 4.47, 95% confidence interval, 1.52–13.11). The 1‐year cumulative incidence of BM onset or progression was 23.1% in the reduced‐dose group and 5.0% in the standard dose group. The risk of worsening BMs with early dose reduction of osimertinib treatment was higher in patients who had BMs before treatment and in younger patients. Conclusion Early dose reduction of osimertinib was a risk factor for the worsening of BMs. A higher risk was associated with younger patients and those presenting BMs before treatment