Commonly used biomarkers do not contribute to diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article was to examine the costs and effectiveness of standardized blood and fecal investigations in patients fulfilling the Rome criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). METHODS: We conducted a real-life cohort study in patients fulfilling the Rome III criteria for IBS without red flag signs or symptoms, in a center of excellence for IBS patients from 1 January 2015 till 1 January 2019. Standardized blood and fecal investigations [hemoglobin (Hb), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), coeliac serology, and fecal calprotectin (FCP)] were performed during the first consultation. Patients were followed for at least 1 year. Primary outcome was the probability of another diagnosis than IBS with subsequent overall costs. RESULTS: A total of 218 patients were included. In approximately 200 patients blood and fecal investigations were performed and 47 patients underwent a colonoscopy. Two-hundred ten patients were diagnosed with IBS, 5 with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), 1 with nonspecific acute ileitis, 1 with hyperthyroidism, and 1 with coeliac disease. The number needed to diagnose all included laboratory tests was 34, and for the individual test: TSH 197, coeliac serology 199, and FCP 50. The total costs were approximately €4900 to diagnose one patient with another diagnosis than IBS. CONCLUSION: In our real-life cohort of adult patients under the age of 50 years fulfilling the Rome criteria for IBS without red flag symptoms, standardized blood, and fecal investigations have a very low diagnostic yield accompanied by high additional costs. Colonoscopy is not indicated in patients with Rome III positive IBS and normal FCP

Commonly used biomarkers do not contribute to diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this article was to examine the costs and effectiveness of standardized blood and fecal investigations in patients fulfilling the Rome criteria for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). METHODS: We conducted a real-life cohort study in patients fulfilling the Rome III criteria for IBS without red flag signs or symptoms, in a center of excellence for IBS patients from 1 January 2015 till 1 January 2019. Standardized blood and fecal investigations [hemoglobin (Hb), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), coeliac serology, and fecal calprotectin (FCP)] were performed during the first consultation. Patients were followed for at least 1 year. Primary outcome was the probability of another diagnosis than IBS with subsequent overall costs. RESULTS: A total of 218 patients were included. In approximately 200 patients blood and fecal investigations were performed and 47 patients underwent a colonoscopy. Two-hundred ten patients were diagnosed with IBS, 5 with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), 1 with nonspecific acute ileitis, 1 with hyperthyroidism, and 1 with coeliac disease. The number needed to diagnose all included laboratory tests was 34, and for the individual test: TSH 197, coeliac serology 199, and FCP 50. The total costs were approximately €4900 to diagnose one patient with another diagnosis than IBS. CONCLUSION: In our real-life cohort of adult patients under the age of 50 years fulfilling the Rome criteria for IBS without red flag symptoms, standardized blood, and fecal investigations have a very low diagnostic yield accompanied by high additional costs. Colonoscopy is not indicated in patients with Rome III positive IBS and normal FCP

Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Refractory Coeliac Disease

A small subset of coeliac disease (CD) patients experiences persisting or recurring symptoms despite strict adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD). When other causes of villous atrophy have been excluded, these patients are referred to as refractory celiac disease (RCD) patients. RCD can be divided in two types based on the absence (type I) or presence (type II) of an, usually clonal, intraepithelial lymphocyte population with aberrant phenotype. RCDI usually runs a benign course and may be difficult to be differentiated from uncomplicated, slow responding CD. In contrast, RCDII can be defined as low-grade intraepithelial lymphoma and frequently transforms into an aggressive enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma with dismal prognosis. This paper describes the clinical characteristics of RCDI and RCDII, diagnostic approach, and the latest insights in treatment options

Evaluation of Cladribine treatment in refractory celiac disease type II

AIM: To evaluate cladribine [2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA)] therapy in refractory celiac disease (RCD) II

Neoplasia and precursor lesions of the female genital tract in ibd: Epidemiology, role of immunosuppressants, and clinical implications

In this review the risk of breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer and cervical and vulvovaginal (pre)malignant abnormalities in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) with or without immune suppressive treatment will be discussed. So far, this has not been studied thoroughly and large studies taking into account diverse potential confounding factors are lacking. IBD per se has not been associated with development of cervical cancer, yet patients with Crohn's disease who smoke, have a younger age at diagnosis or who use(d) thiopurines might be more at risk. Other immunosuppressive medication seems not to increase this risk, however, as evidence at this point is incomplete, physician awareness and prevention by lifestyle counseling, HPV vaccination and (intensified) screening are warranted. The risk for breast, endometrial, ovarian, and vulvovaginal cancer in IBD patients appears to be comparable to the background population, although for breast cancer this may even be decreasedin Crohn's disease specifically. Immunosuppressive medication in general does not seem to alter this risk. Earlier and more frequent screening for breast cancer than currently conducted in general nationwide screening programs is not recommended at this moment. Current literature suggests a much lower overall malignancy recurrence rate in IBD patients than has been observed previously. More importantly, immune suppressive medication does not appear to increase the recurrence risk. Robust epidemiologic data on female genital tract cancer are needed

Vulvar and vaginal neoplasia in women with inflammatory bowel disease

Immunosuppressive drugs are the cornerstone in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), however they are associated with an increased risk of extra-intestinal cancer. Whether the risk for female genital tract malignancies, including vulvar and vaginal cancer, is increased is less clear. Our aim was to investigate the risk of these malignancies in IBD-patients. Histopathological data of all IBD patients with a vulvar or vaginal (pre-)cancerous lesion were retrieved from the Dutch nationwide network and registry of histopathology and cytopathology from 1991 to 2015. Medical history was retrieved from patient records. Data from the Central Office for Statistics, the Dutch comprehensive cancer organization, and the IBDSL cohort were obtained to calculate the standardized, and age-adjusted incidence rates. Fifty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. A standardized incidence rate of 1.2(95% CI:0.8–1.7) for vulvar and vaginal carcinoma among adult female IBD was calculated, which did not significantly differ from the general population. The use of immunosuppressive therapy did not increase the occurrence of vulvovaginal malignancy, nor did it influence the recurrence rate. However, immunosuppressive drugs ever-users were on average 11 years younger at the time of their gynaecological diagnosis. Overall, our data do not support intensified screening for vulvar or vaginal malignancies in female IBD patients