Structural adaptation of the subunit interface of oligomeric thermophilic and hyperthermophilic enzymes

Enzymes from thermophilic and, particularly, from hyperthermophilic organisms are surprisingly stable. Understanding of the molecular origin of protein thermostability and thermoactivity attracted the interest of many scientist both for the perspective comprehension of the principles of protein structure and for the possible biotechnological applications through application of protein engineering. Comparative studies at sequence and structure levels were aimed at detecting significant differences of structural parameters related to protein stability between thermophilic and hyperhermophilic structures and their mesophilic homologs. Comparative studies were useful in the identification of a few recurrent themes which the evolution utilized in different combinations in different protein families. These studies were mostly carried out at the monomer level. However, maintenance of a proper quaternary structure is an essential prerequisite for a functional macromolecule. At the environmental temperatures experienced typically by hyper- and thermophiles, the subunit interactions mediated by the interface must be sufficiently stable. Our analysis was therefore aimed at the identification of the molecular strategies adopted by evolution to enhance interface thermostability of oligomeric enzymes. The variation of several structural properties related to protein stability were tested at the subunit interfaces of thermophilic and hyperthermophilic oligomers. The differences of the interface structural features observed between the hyperthermophilic and thermophilic enzymes were compared with the differences of the same properties calculated from pairwise comparisons of oligomeric mesophilic proteins contained in a reference dataset. The significance of the observed differences of structural properties was measured by a t-test. Ion pairs and hydrogen bonds do not vary significantly while hydrophobic contact area increases specially in hyperthermophilic interfaces. Interface compactness also appears to increase in the hyperthermophilic proteins. Variations of amino acid composition at the interfaces reflects the variation of the interface properties. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Structural adaptation to low temperature - analysis of the subunit interface of oligomeric psychrophilic enzymes

Enzymes from psychrophiles show higher catalytic efficiency in the 0-20 degrees C temperature range and often lower thermostability in comparison with meso/thermophilic homologs. Physical and chemical characterization of these enzymes is currently underway in order to understand the molecular basis of cold adaptation. Psychrophilic enzymes are often characterized by higher flexibility, which allows for better interaction with substrates, and by a lower activation energy requirement in comparison with meso/thermophilic counterparts. In their tertiary structure, psychrophilic enzymes present fewer stabilizing interactions, longer and more hydrophilic loops, higher glycine content, and lower proline and arginine content. In this study, a comparative analysis of the structural characteristics of the interfaces between oligomeric psychrophilic enzyme subunits was carried out. Crystallographic structures of oligomeric psychrophilic enzymes, and their meso/thermophilic homologs belonging to five different protein families, were retrieved from the Protein Data Bank. The following structural parameters were calculated: overall and core interface area, characterization of polar/apolar contributions to the interface, hydrophobic contact area, quantity of ion pairs and hydrogen bonds between monomers, internal area and total volume of non-solvent-exposed cavities at the interface, and average packing of interface residues. These properties were compared to those of meso/thermophilic enzymes. The results were analyzed using Student's t-test. The most significant differences between psychrophilic and mesophilic proteins were found in the number of ion pairs and hydrogen bonds, and in the apolarity of their subunit interface. Interestingly, the number of ion pairs at the interface shows an opposite adaptation to those occurring at the monomer core and surface