52 research outputs found
Generalized Twisted Gabidulin Codes
Let be a set of by matrices over such
that the rank of is at least for all distinct .
Suppose that . If , then
is a maximum rank distance (MRD for short) code. Until 2016,
there were only two known constructions of MRD codes for arbitrary .
One was found by Delsarte (1978) and Gabidulin (1985) independently, and it was
later generalized by Kshevetskiy and Gabidulin (2005). We often call them
(generalized) Gabidulin codes. Another family was recently obtained by Sheekey
(2016), and its elements are called twisted Gabidulin codes. In the same paper,
Sheekey also proposed a generalization of the twisted Gabidulin codes. However
the equivalence problem for it is not considered, whence it is not clear
whether there exist new MRD codes in this generalization. We call the members
of this putative larger family generalized twisted Gabidulin codes. In this
paper, we first compute the Delsarte duals and adjoint codes of them, then we
completely determine the equivalence between different generalized twisted
Gabidulin codes. In particular, it can be proven that, up to equivalence,
generalized Gabidulin codes and twisted Gabidulin codes are both proper subsets
of this family.Comment: One missing case (n=4) has been included in the appendix. Typos are
corrected, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 201
Slices of the unitary spread
We prove that slices of the unitary spread of Q(+)(7, q), q equivalent to 2 (mod 3), can be partitioned into five disjoint classes. Slices belonging to different classes are non-equivalent under the action of the subgroup of P Gamma O+(8, q) fixing the unitary spread. When q is even, there is a connection between spreads of Q(+)(7, q) and symplectic 2-spreads of PG(5, q) (see Dillon, Ph.D. thesis, 1974 and Dye, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4) 114, 173-194, 1977). As a consequence of the above result we determine all the possible non-equivalent symplectic 2-spreads arising from the unitary spread of Q(+)(7, q), q = 2(2h+1). Some of these already appeared in Kantor, SIAM J. Algebr. Discrete Methods 3(2), 151-165, 1982. When q = 3(h), we classify, up to the action of the stabilizer in P Gamma O(7, q) of the unitary spread of Q(6, q), those among its slices producing spreads of the elliptic quadric Q(-)(5, q)
On sets of subspaces with two intersection dimensions and a geometrical junta bound
In this article, constant dimension subspace codes whose codewords have
subspace distance in a prescribed set of integers, are considered. The easiest
example of such an object is a {\it junta}; i.e. a subspace code in which all
codewords go through a common subspace. We focus on the case when only two
intersection values for the codewords, are assigned. In such a case we
determine an upper bound for the dimension of the vector space spanned by the
elements of a non-junta code. In addition, if the two intersection values are
consecutive, we prove that such a bound is tight, and classify the examples
attaining the largest possible dimension as one of four infinite families
Spreads of and ovoids of polar spaces
To any spread S of PG(3,q) corresponds a family of locally
hermitian ovoids of the Hermitian surface H(3, q^2), and
conversely;
if in addition S is a semifield spread, then each
associated ovoid is a translation ovoid, and conversely.
In this paper we calculate the translation group of the locally
hermitian ovoids of H(3,q^2) arising from a given semifield
spread,
and we characterize the p-semiclassical ovoid constructed by Cossidente, Ebert, Marino and Siciliano as the only translation ovoid of H(3,q^2)
whose
translation group is abelian.
If S is a spread of PG(3,q) and O(S) is one of the
associated ovoids of H(3,q^2),
then using the duality between
H(3,q^2) and Q^-(5, q) , another spread of PG(3,q) , say
S_1, can be constructed.
On the other hand, using the
Barlotti-Cofman representation of H(3,q^2), one more spread of a
3-dimensional projective space,
say S_2, arises from the
ovoid O(S). Lunardon has posed some questions on the
relations among S, S_1 and S_2;
here we prove that the
three spreads are always isomorphic
- …