Modelo de avaliação físico-funcional da coluna vertebral Modelo de evaluación físico-funcional de la columna vertebral Spinal cord physical assessment model

O presente trabalho descreve os métodos semiológicos que devem ser empregados na exploração postural e na avaliação da coluna vertebral, dentro da assistência à saúde em nível primário. Os métodos empregados nessa propedêutica sistematizada englobam o histórico e um exame físico específico composto de: inspeção estática e exame postural; inspeção dinâmica; palpação; avaliação da força e flexibilidade musculares; exame neurológico e manobras especiais.<br>El presente trabajo describe un modelo de evaluación fisico-funcional que puede ser empleado en la evaluación postural y en la valoración de la columna vertebral dentro de la atención a la salud en nivel primario. Los métodos empleados en esa propedéutica sistematizada engloban la historia clínica y un examen físico específico compuesto de inspección estática y examen de la postura, inspección dinámica, palpación, evaluación de la fuerza y flexibilidad muscular, examen neurológico y maniobras especiales.<br>The study describes semiological methods that must be employed in posture and spinal cord evaluation, considering primary health care. The methods used in this study involve the patient´s history, and a specific physical examination which includes a static inspection, posture examination, dynamic inspection, palpation, muscle strength and flexibility assessment, neurological examination and special tests

Notes for genera – Ascomycota

Knowledge of the relationships and thus the classification of fungi, has developed rapidly with increasingly widespread use of molecular techniques, over the past 10--15 years, and continues to accelerate. Several genera have been found to be polyphyletic, and their generic concepts have subsequently been emended. New names have thus been introduced for species which are phylogenetically distinct from the type species of particular genera. The ending of the separate naming of morphs of the same species in 2011, has also caused changes in fungal generic names. In order to facilitate access to all important changes, it was desirable to compile these in a single document. The present article provides a list of generic names of Ascomycota (approximately 6500 accepted names published to the end of 2016), including those which are lichen-forming. Notes and summaries of the changes since the last edition of `Ainsworth Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi' in 2008 are provided. The notes include the number of accepted species, classification, type species (with location of the type material), culture availability, life-styles, distribution, and selected publications that have appeared since 2008. This work is intended to provide the foundation for updating the ascomycete component of the ``Without prejudice list of generic names of Fungi'' published in 2013, which will be developed into a list of protected generic names. This will be subjected to the XIXth International Botanical Congress in Shenzhen in July 2017 agreeing to a modification in the rules relating to protected lists, and scrutiny by procedures determined by the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi (NCF). The previously invalidly published generic names Barriopsis, Collophora (as Collophorina), Cryomyces, Dematiopleospora, Heterospora (as Heterosporicola), Lithophila, Palmomyces (as Palmaria) and Saxomyces are validated, as are two previously invalid family names, Bartaliniaceae and Wiesneriomycetaceae. Four species of Lalaria, which were invalidly published are transferred to Taphrina and validated as new combinations. Catenomycopsis Tibell Constant. is reduced under Chaenothecopsis Vain., while Dichomera Cooke is reduced under Botryosphaeria Ces. De Not. (Art. 59)