Fission yeast 26S proteasome mutants are multi-drug resistant due to stabilization of the pap1 transcription factor

Here we report the result of a genetic screen for mutants resistant to the microtubule poison methyl benzimidazol-2-yl carbamate (MBC) that were also temperature sensitive for growth. In total the isolated mutants were distributed in ten complementation groups. Cloning experiments revealed that most of the mutants were in essential genes encoding various 26S proteasome subunits. We found that the proteasome mutants are multi-drug resistant due to stabilization of the stress-activated transcription factor Pap1. We show that the ubiquitylation and ultimately the degradation of Pap1 depend on the Rhp6/Ubc2 E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzyme and the Ubr1 E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase. Accordingly, mutants lacking Rhp6 or Ubr1 display drug-resistant phenotypes

Ectoplasm with an Edge

The construction of supersymmetric invariant actions on a spacetime manifold with a boundary is carried out using the "ectoplasm" formalism for the construction of closed forms in superspace. Non-trivial actions are obtained from the pull-backs to the bosonic bodies of closed but non-exact forms in superspace; finding supersymmetric invariants thus becomes a cohomology problem. For a spacetime with a boundary, the appropriate mathematical language changes to relative cohomology, which we use to give a general formulation of off-shell supersymmetric invariants in the presence of boundaries. We also relate this construction to the superembedding formalism for the construction of brane actions, and we give examples with bulk spacetimes of dimension 3, 4 and 5. The closed superform in the 5D example needs to be constructed as a Chern-Simons type of invariant, obtained from a closed 6-form displaying Weil triviality.Comment: 25 page

Phytoplankton evolution during the creation of a biofloc system for shrimp culture

[EN] Microalgae play a key role in the dynamics of biofloc technology aquaculture systems. Some phytoplankton groups, such as diatoms, are desired for their high nutritional value and contribution to water quality. Other groups, such as cyanobacteria, are undesired because of their low nutritional value and capacity of producing toxins. So, monitoring the phytoplankton community structure and succession is key for managing biofloc systems. However, research on phytoplankton in these systems is scarce and mostly done by microscopy. The primary objective of this research was to estimate phytoplankton community structure in shrimp biofloc system water samples, using high-performance liquid chromatography methods and CHEMTAX software. The major groups present in our system were diatoms, euglenophytes, cyanobacteria and chlorophytes, while dinoflagellates were only remarkable at the initial period. We observed a clear dominance of diatoms all along the 5 months that comprised a complete biofloc system culture. The characteristic succession of autotrophic processes by heterotrophs of the biofloc systems, was observed by the reduction of net primary production. Light intensity played a key role in determining the phytoplankton composition and abundance. Algal pigment analyses using high-performance liquid chromatography and subsequent CHEMTAX analysis in water samples was useful for estimating the phytoplankton community structure in the biofloc systems. However, we found some limitations when the biofloc system was in heterotrophic mode. Under these conditions, some dinoflagellates and cyanobacteria behaved as heterotrophs and lost or decreased their biomarkers pigments. So, further research is needed to increase knowledge on the accuracy of high-performance liquid chromatography /CHEMTAX under these conditions.Financial support for this research was provided by Conselleria d’Educació, Investigació, Cultura i Esport of the Generalitat Valenciana, through the program VALi+D, fle number ACIF/2014/244. We would like to express our deepest thanks to Professor Luis Henrique da Silva Poersch of FURG (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande) and Ivan Vidal (Langostinos el Real) for his support. Finally, the authors wish to thank Le Gouessant and Michaël Metz for providing the commercial feed.Llario-Sempere, F.; Rodilla, M.; Escrivá-Perales, J.; Falco, S.; Sebastiá-Frasquet, M. (2018). Phytoplankton evolution during the creation of a biofloc system for shrimp culture. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1655-5S112Ahmed A, Kurian S, Gauns M, Chndrasekhararao AV, Mulla A, Naik B, Naik H, Naqvi SWA (2016) Spatial variability in phytoplankton community structure along the eastern Arabian Sea during the onset of south-west monsoon. Cont Shelf Res 119:30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2016.03.005Avnimelech Y (1999) Carbon/nitrogen ratio as a control element in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture 176:227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00085-XAvnimelech Y (2007) Feeding with microbial flocs by tilapia in minimal discharge bio-flocs technology ponds. Aquaculture 264:140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.11.025Avnimelech Y (2009) Biofloc technology. A practical guide book. The World Aquaculture Society, Baton RougeAzim ME, Little DC (2008) The biofloc technology (BFT) in indoor tanks: water quality, biofloc composition, and growth and welfare of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 283:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.06.036Ballester ELC, Abreu PC, Cavalli RO, Emerenciano M, de Abreu L, Wasielesky WJ (2010) Effect of practical diets with different protein levels on the performance of Farfantepenaeus paulensis juveniles nursed in a zero exchange suspended microbial flocs intensive system. Aquac Nutr 16:163–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2009.00648.xBaloi M, Arantes R, Schveitzer R, Magnotti C, Vinatea L (2013) Performance of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei raised in biofloc systems with varying levels of light exposure. Aquac Eng 52:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2012.07.003Baumgarten MGZ, Wallner-Kersanach M, Niencheski LFH (2010) Manual de análises em oceanografia química. Furg, Rio GrandeBecerra-Dórame MJ, Martínez-Córdova LR, Martínez-Porchas M, Lopez-Elías JA (2011) Evaluation of autotrophic and heterotrophic microcosm- based systems on the production response of Litopenaeus vannamei intensively nursed without Artemia and with zero water exchange. Isr J Aquac Bamidgeh 63:7Brito LO, dos Santos IGS, de Abreu JL, de Araújo MT, Severi W, Gàlvez AO (2016) Effect of the addition of diatoms (Navicula spp.) and rotifers (Brachionus plicatilis) on water quality and growth of the Litopenaeus vannamei postlarvae reared in a biofloc system. Aquac Res 47:3990–3997. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12849Campa-Córdova AI, Núñez-Vázquez EJ, Luna-González A, Romero-Geraldo MJ, Ascencio F (2009) Superoxide dismutase activity in juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei and Nodipecten subnodosus exposed to the toxic dinoflagellate Prorocentrum lima. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 149:317–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2008.08.006Casé M, Leça EE, Leitão SN, SantAnna EE, Schwamborn R, de Moraes Junior AT (2008) Plankton community as an indicator of water quality in tropical shrimp culture ponds. Mar Pollut Bull 56:1343–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2008.02.008Chen YC (2001) Immobilized microalga Scenedesmus quadricauda (Chlorophyta, Chlorococcales) for long-term storage and for application for water quality control in fish culture. Aquaculture 195:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(00)00540-8Correia ES, Wilkenfeld JS, Morris TC, Wei L, Prangnell DI, Samocha TM (2014) Intensive nursery production of the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei using two commercial feeds with high and low protein content in a biofloc-dominated system. Aquac Eng 59:48–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2014.02.002Duarte CM, Marrasé C, Vaqué D, Estrada M (1990) Counting error and the quantitative analysis of phytoplankton communities. J Plankton Res 12:295–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/12.2.295Ebeling J, Timmons M, Bisogni J (2006) Engineering analysis of the stoichiometry of photoautotrophic, autotrophic, and heterotrophic removal of ammonia–nitrogen in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture 257:346–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.03.019El-Dahhar AA, Salama M, Elebiary EH (2015) Effect of energy to protein ratio in biofloc technology on water quality, survival and growth of mullet (Mugil cephalus). J Arab Aquac Soc 10:15–32. https://doi.org/10.12816/0026633Emerenciano MGC, Martínez-Córdova LR, Martínez-Porchas M, Miranda-Baeza A (2017) Biofloc technology (BFT): a tool for water quality management. In: Tutu H (ed) water quality. InTech, Rijeka. https://doi.org/10.5772/66416Figueroa F, Niell F, Figueiras F, Villarino M (1998) Diel migration of phytoplankton and spectral light field in the Ria de Vigo (NW Spain). Mar Biol 130:491–499Gaona CAP, Poersch LH, Krummenauer D, Foes GK, Wasielesky WJ (2011) The effect of solids removal on water quality, growth and survival of Litopenaeus vannamei in a biofloc technology culture system. Int J Recirc Aquac. https://doi.org/10.21061/ijra.v12i1.1354Garrido JL, Airs RL, Rodríguez F, Van Heukelem L, Zapata M (2011) New HPLC separation techniques. In: Roy S, Llewellyn CA, Egeland ES, Johnsen G (eds) Phytoplankton pigments: characterization, chemotaxonomy, and applications in oceanography. University Press, Cambridge, pp 165–194Ge H, Li J, Chang Z, Chen P, Shen M, Zhao F (2016) Effect of microalgae with semicontinuous harvesting on water quality and zootechnical performance of white shrimp reared in the zero water exchange system. Aquac Eng 72–73:70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2016.04.006Godoy LC, Odebrecht C, Ballester E, Martins TG, Wasielesky WJ (2012) Effect of diatom supplementation during the nursery rearing of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) in a heterotrophic culture system. Aquac Int 20:559–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-011-9485-1Grasshoff K (1976) Methods of seawater analysis. Verlag Chemie: Weinstei, New YorkGreen BW, Schrader KK, Perschbacher PW (2014) Effect of stocking biomass on solids, phytoplankton communities, common off-flavors, and production parameters in a channel catfish biofloc technology production system. Aquac Res 45:1442–1458. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12096Gris B, Sforza E, Morosinotto T, Bertucco A, La Rocca N (2017) Influence of light and temperature on growth and high-value molecules productivity from Cyanobacterium aponinum. J Appl Phycol 29:1781–1790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-017-1133-3Higgins HW, Wright SW, Schlüter L (2011) Quantitative interpretation of chemotaxonomic pigment data. In: Roy S, Llewellyn CA, Egeland ES, Johnsen G (eds) Phytoplankton pigments: characterization, chemotaxonomy, and applications in oceanography. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 257–313Hooker S, Firestone E, Claustre H, Ras J (2001) The first SeaWiFS HPLC analysis round-robin experiment (SeaHARRE-1). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20010072242 . Accessed 19 July 2017Horabun T (1997) Relationships between water quality and phytoplankton in the Bangpakong river. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=TH2000001898 . Accessed 19 July 2017Ismael AA (2003) Succession of heterotrophic and mixotrophic dinoflagellates as well as autotrophic microplankton in the harbour of Alexandria, Egypt. J Plankton Res 25:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/25.2.193Jeffrey SW, Sielicki M, Haxo FT (1975) Chloroplast pigment patterns in dinoflagellates. J Phycol 11:374–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.1975.tb02799.xJeong HJ, Yoo YD, Kim JS, Seong KA, Kang NS, Kim TH (2010) Growth, feeding and ecological roles of the mixotrophic and heterotrophic dinoflagellates in marine planktonic food webs. Ocean Sci J 45:65–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12601-010-0007-2Jory DE, Cabrera TR, Dugger DM, Fegan D, Lee PG, Lawrence L, Jackson C, Mcintosh R, Castañeda J, International B, Park H, Hwy N, Pierce F (2001) A global review of shrimp feed management: status and perspectives. Aquaculture 318:104–152Ju ZY, Forster I, Conquest L, Dominy W, Kuo WC, Horgen FD (2008) Determination of microbial community structures of shrimp floc cultures by biomarkers and analysis of floc amino acid profiles. Aquac Res 39:118–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01856.xKingston MB (1999) Effect of light on vertical migration and photosynthesis of Euglena proxima (euglenophyta). J Phycol 35:245–253. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3520245.xLatasa M, Scharek R, Vidal M, Vila-Reixach G (2010) Preferences of phytoplankton groups for waters of different trophic status in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 40:27–42. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08559Li Y, Swift E, Buskey EJ (1996) Photoinhibition of mechanically stimulable bioluminescence in the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Protoperidinium depressum (pyrrophyta). J Phycol 32:974–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1996.00974.xLi A, Stoecker D, Adolf J (1999) Feeding, pigmentation, photosynthesis and growth of the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Gyrodinium galatheanum. Aquat Microb Ecol 19:163–176. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame019163Lin YC, Chen JC (2001) Acute toxicity of ammonia on Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) juveniles at different salinity levels. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 259:109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(01)00227-1Lin YC, Chen JC (2003) Acute toxicity of nitrite on Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) juveniles at different salinity levels. Aquaculture 224:93–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00220-5Lohscheider JN, Strittmatter M, Küpper H, Adamska I, Heaney S, Cunningham C (2011) Vertical distribution of epibenthic freshwater cyanobacterial Synechococcus spp. Strains depends on their ability for photoprotection. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020134Lukwambe B, Qiuqian L, Wu J, Zhang D, Wang K, Zheng Z (2015) The effects of commercial microbial agents (probiotics) on phytoplankton community structure in intensive white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) aquaculture ponds. Aquac Int 23:1443–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-015-9895-6Mackey MD, Mackey DJ, Higgins HW, Wright SW (1996) CHEMTAX—a program for estimating class abundances from chemical markers: application to HPLC measurements of phytoplankton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 144:265–283Maicá PF, de Borba MR, Wasielesky WJ (2012) Effect of low salinity on microbial floc composition and performance of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) juveniles reared in a zero-water-exchange super-intensive system. Aquac Res 43:361–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.02838.xManan H, Moh JHZ, Kasan NA, Suratman S, Ikhwanuddin M (2016) Identification of biofloc microscopic composition as the natural bioremediation in zero water exchange of Pacific white shrimp, Penaeus vannamei, culture in closed hatchery system. Appl Water Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0421-4Marinho YF, Brito LO, Campos S, Severi W, Andrade HA, Galvez AO (2016) Effect of the addition of Chaetoceros calcitrans, Navicula sp. and Phaeodactylum tricornutum (diatoms) on phytoplankton composition and growth of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone) postlarvae reared in a biofloc system. Aquac Res 48:4155–4164. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13235Martins TG, Odebrecht C, Jensen LV, D’Oca MG, Wasielesky WJ (2016) The contribution of diatoms to bioflocs lipid content and the performance of juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) in a BFT culture system. Aquac Res 47:1315–1326. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12592Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(00)88444-5Natrah FMI, Bossier P, Sorgeloos P, Yusoff FM, Defoirdt T (2014) Significance of microalgal-bacterial interactions for aquaculture. Rev Aquac 6:48–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12024Niemi G, Wardrop D, Brooks R, Anderson S, Brady V, Paerl H, Rakocinski C, Brouwer M, Levinson B, McDonald M (2004) Rationale for a new generation of indicators for coastal waters. Environ Health Perspect 112:979–986. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6903Paerl H, Tucker C (1995) Ecology of blue-green algae in aquaculture ponds. J World Aquac 26:109–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.1995.tb00235.xPérez-Linares J, Ochoa JL, GagoMartínez A (2008) Effect of PSP toxins in white leg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei Boone, 1931. J Food Sci 73:T69–T73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00710.xPérez-Morales A, Band-Schmidt CJ, Martínez-Díaz SF (2017) Mortality on zoea stage of the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei caused by Cochlodinium polykrikoides (Dinophyceae) and Chattonella spp. (Raphidophyceae). Mar Biol 164:57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-017-3083-3Ray AJ, Dillon KS, Lotz JM (2011) Water quality dynamics and shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) production in intensive, mesohaline culture systems with two levels of biofloc management. Aquac Eng 45:127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2011.09.001Schlüter L, Lauridsen T, Krogh G (2006) Identification and quantification of phytoplankton groups in lakes using new pigment ratios–a comparison between pigment analysis by HPLC and microscopy. Freshwater 51:1474–1485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01582.x/fullSchlüter L, Behl S, Striebel M, Stibor H (2016) Comparing microscopic counts and pigment analyses in 46 phytoplankton communities from lakes of different trophic state. Freshw Biol 61:1627–1639. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12803Schrader KK, Green BW, Perschbacher PW (2011) Development of phytoplankton communities and common off-flavors in a biofloc technology system used for the culture of channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus). Aquac Eng 45:118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2011.08.004Sebastiá M, Rodilla M (2013) Nutrient and phytoplankton analysis of a Mediterranean Coastal area. Environ Manage 51:225–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9986-3Sebastiá M, Rodilla M, Sanchis J, Altur V (2012) Influence of nutrient inputs from a wetland dominated by agriculture on the phytoplankton community in a shallow harbour at the Spanish Mediterranean coast. Agric Ecosyst Environ 152:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.02.006Seoane S, Garmendia M, Revilla M, Borja Á, Franco J, Orive E, Valencia V (2011) Phytoplankton pigments and epifluorescence microscopy as tools for ecological status assessment in coastal and estuarine waters, within the Water Framework. Mar Pollut 62:1484–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.04.010Sinden A, Sinang SC (2016) Cyanobacteria in aquaculture systems: linking the occurrence, abundance and toxicity with rising temperatures. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:2855–2862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1112-2Sospedra J, Niencheski LFH, Falco S, Andrade CF, Attisano KK, Rodilla M (2017) Identifying the main sources of silicate in coastal waters of the Southern Gulf of Valencia (Western Mediterranean Sea). Oceanologia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceano.2017.07.004Strickland J (1960) Measuring the production of marine phytoplankton. Bull Fish Res Bd Canada 122:172Ter Braak CJF (1994) Canonical community ordination. Part I: basic theory and linear methods. Écoscience 1:127–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.1994.11682237Ter Braak C, Smilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/wever/341885 . Accessed 19 July 2017Utermohl M (1985) Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitative Phytoplankton-Methodik. Limnologie 9:1–38Van Wyk P, Scarpa J (1999) Water quality requirements and management. In: Institution Harbor Branch Oceanographic (ed) Farming marine shrimp in recirculating freshwater systems. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Florida, pp 128–138Vinatea L, Gálvez AO, Browdy CL, Stokes A, Venero J, Haveman J, Lewis BL, Lawson A, Shuler A, Leffler JW (2010) Photosynthesis, water respiration and growth performance of Litopenaeus vannamei in a super-intensive raceway culture with zero water exchange: interaction of water quality variables. Aquac Eng 42:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2009.09.001Wright S, Jeffrey S, Mantoura R (1991) Improved HPLC method for the analysis of chlorophylls and carotenoids from marine phytoplankton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 77:186–196Yu H, Jia S, Dai Y (2009) Growth characteristics of the cyanobacterium Nostoc flagelliforme in photoautotrophic, mixotrophic and heterotrophic cultivation. J Appl Phycol 21:127–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-008-9341-5Yusoff FM, Zubaidah MS, Matias HB, Kwan TS (2002) Phytoplankton succession in intensive marine shrimp culture ponds treated with a commercial bacterial product. Aquac Res 33:269–278. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1355-557x.2002.00671.

Carnivore Translocations and Conservation: Insights from Population Models and Field Data for Fishers (Martes pennanti)

Translocations are frequently used to restore extirpated carnivore populations. Understanding the factors that influence translocation success is important because carnivore translocations can be time consuming, expensive, and controversial. Using population viability software, we modeled reintroductions of the fisher, a candidate for endangered or threatened status in the Pacific states of the US. Our model predicts that the most important factor influencing successful re-establishment of a fisher population is the number of adult females reintroduced (provided some males are also released). Data from 38 translocations of fishers in North America, including 30 reintroductions, 5 augmentations and 3 introductions, show that the number of females released was, indeed, a good predictor of success but that the number of males released, geographic region and proximity of the source population to the release site were also important predictors. The contradiction between model and data regarding males may relate to the assumption in the model that all males are equally good breeders. We hypothesize that many males may need to be released to insure a sufficient number of good breeders are included, probably large males. Seventy-seven percent of reintroductions with known outcomes (success or failure) succeeded; all 5 augmentations succeeded; but none of the 3 introductions succeeded. Reintroductions were instrumental in reestablishing fisher populations within their historical range and expanding the range from its most-contracted state (43% of the historical range) to its current state (68% of the historical range). To increase the likelihood of translocation success, we recommend that managers: 1) release as many fishers as possible, 2) release more females than males (55–60% females) when possible, 3) release as many adults as possible, especially large males, 4) release fishers from a nearby source population, 5) conduct a formal feasibility assessment, and 6) develop a comprehensive implementation plan that includes an active monitoring program

Is using the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a community sample the optimal way to assess mental health functioning?

An important characteristic of a screening tool is its discriminant ability or the measure’s accuracy to distinguish between those with and without mental health problems. The current study examined the inter-rater agreement and screening concordance of the parent and teacher versions of SDQ at scale, subscale and item-levels, with the view of identifying the items that have the most informant discrepancies; and determining whether the concordance between parent and teacher reports on some items has the potential to influence decision making. Cross-sectional data from parent and teacher reports of the mental health functioning of a community sample of 299 students with and without disabilities from 75 different primary schools in Perth, Western Australia were analysed. The study found that: a) Intraclass correlations between parent and teacher ratings of children’s mental health using the SDQ at person level was fair on individual child level; b) The SDQ only demonstrated clinical utility when there was agreement between teacher and parent reports using the possible or 90% dichotomisation system; and c) Three individual items had positive likelihood ratio scores indicating clinical utility. Of note was the finding that the negative likelihood ratio or likelihood of disregarding the absence of a condition when both parents and teachers rate the item as absent was not significant. Taken together, these findings suggest that the SDQ is not optimised for use in community samples and that further psychometric evaluation of the SDQ in this context is clearly warranted

Present state and future perspectives of using pluripotent stem cells in toxicology research

The use of novel drugs and chemicals requires reliable data on their potential toxic effects on humans. Current test systems are mainly based on animals or in vitro–cultured animal-derived cells and do not or not sufficiently mirror the situation in humans. Therefore, in vitro models based on human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) have become an attractive alternative. The article summarizes the characteristics of pluripotent stem cells, including embryonic carcinoma and embryonic germ cells, and discusses the potential of pluripotent stem cells for safety pharmacology and toxicology. Special attention is directed to the potential application of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) for the assessment of developmental toxicology as well as cardio- and hepatotoxicology. With respect to embryotoxicology, recent achievements of the embryonic stem cell test (EST) are described and current limitations as well as prospects of embryotoxicity studies using pluripotent stem cells are discussed. Furthermore, recent efforts to establish hPSC-based cell models for testing cardio- and hepatotoxicity are presented. In this context, methods for differentiation and selection of cardiac and hepatic cells from hPSCs are summarized, requirements and implications with respect to the use of these cells in safety pharmacology and toxicology are presented, and future challenges and perspectives of using hPSCs are discussed

Single-dose administration and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine: a pooled analysis of four randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine has been approved for emergency use by the UK regulatory authority, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, with a regimen of two standard doses given with an interval of 4-12 weeks. The planned roll-out in the UK will involve vaccinating people in high-risk categories with their first dose immediately, and delivering the second dose 12 weeks later. Here, we provide both a further prespecified pooled analysis of trials of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and exploratory analyses of the impact on immunogenicity and efficacy of extending the interval between priming and booster doses. In addition, we show the immunogenicity and protection afforded by the first dose, before a booster dose has been offered. METHODS: We present data from three single-blind randomised controlled trials-one phase 1/2 study in the UK (COV001), one phase 2/3 study in the UK (COV002), and a phase 3 study in Brazil (COV003)-and one double-blind phase 1/2 study in South Africa (COV005). As previously described, individuals 18 years and older were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive two standard doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (5 × 1010 viral particles) or a control vaccine or saline placebo. In the UK trial, a subset of participants received a lower dose (2·2 × 1010 viral particles) of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 for the first dose. The primary outcome was virologically confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 disease, defined as a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT)-positive swab combined with at least one qualifying symptom (fever ≥37·8°C, cough, shortness of breath, or anosmia or ageusia) more than 14 days after the second dose. Secondary efficacy analyses included cases occuring at least 22 days after the first dose. Antibody responses measured by immunoassay and by pseudovirus neutralisation were exploratory outcomes. All cases of COVID-19 with a NAAT-positive swab were adjudicated for inclusion in the analysis by a masked independent endpoint review committee. The primary analysis included all participants who were SARS-CoV-2 N protein seronegative at baseline, had had at least 14 days of follow-up after the second dose, and had no evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection from NAAT swabs. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose. The four trials are registered at ISRCTN89951424 (COV003) and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04324606 (COV001), NCT04400838 (COV002), and NCT04444674 (COV005). FINDINGS: Between April 23 and Dec 6, 2020, 24 422 participants were recruited and vaccinated across the four studies, of whom 17 178 were included in the primary analysis (8597 receiving ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and 8581 receiving control vaccine). The data cutoff for these analyses was Dec 7, 2020. 332 NAAT-positive infections met the primary endpoint of symptomatic infection more than 14 days after the second dose. Overall vaccine efficacy more than 14 days after the second dose was 66·7% (95% CI 57·4-74·0), with 84 (1·0%) cases in the 8597 participants in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group and 248 (2·9%) in the 8581 participants in the control group. There were no hospital admissions for COVID-19 in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group after the initial 21-day exclusion period, and 15 in the control group. 108 (0·9%) of 12 282 participants in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group and 127 (1·1%) of 11 962 participants in the control group had serious adverse events. There were seven deaths considered unrelated to vaccination (two in the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 group and five in the control group), including one COVID-19-related death in one participant in the control group. Exploratory analyses showed that vaccine efficacy after a single standard dose of vaccine from day 22 to day 90 after vaccination was 76·0% (59·3-85·9). Our modelling analysis indicated that protection did not wane during this initial 3-month period. Similarly, antibody levels were maintained during this period with minimal waning by day 90 (geometric mean ratio [GMR] 0·66 [95% CI 0·59-0·74]). In the participants who received two standard doses, after the second dose, efficacy was higher in those with a longer prime-boost interval (vaccine efficacy 81·3% [95% CI 60·3-91·2] at ≥12 weeks) than in those with a short interval (vaccine efficacy 55·1% [33·0-69·9] at <6 weeks). These observations are supported by immunogenicity data that showed binding antibody responses more than two-fold higher after an interval of 12 or more weeks compared with an interval of less than 6 weeks in those who were aged 18-55 years (GMR 2·32 [2·01-2·68]). INTERPRETATION: The results of this primary analysis of two doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 were consistent with those seen in the interim analysis of the trials and confirm that the vaccine is efficacious, with results varying by dose interval in exploratory analyses. A 3-month dose interval might have advantages over a programme with a short dose interval for roll-out of a pandemic vaccine to protect the largest number of individuals in the population as early as possible when supplies are scarce, while also improving protection after receiving a second dose. FUNDING: UK Research and Innovation, National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR), The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Lemann Foundation, Rede D'Or, the Brava and Telles Foundation, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Thames Valley and South Midland's NIHR Clinical Research Network, and AstraZeneca