103 research outputs found
PI3Kinase signaling in glioblastoma
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary tumor of the CNS in the adult. It is characterized by exponential growth and diffuse invasiveness. Among many different genetic alterations in GBM, e.g., mutations of PTEN, EGFR, p16/p19 and p53 and their impact on aberrant signaling have been thoroughly characterized. A major barrier to develop a common therapeutic strategy is founded on the fact that each tumor has its individual genetic fingerprint. Nonetheless, the PI3K pathway may represent a common therapeutic target to most GBM due to its central position in the signaling cascade affecting proliferation, apoptosis and migration. The read-out of blocking PI3K alone or in combination with other cancer pathways should mainly focus, besides the cytostatic effect, on cell death induction since sublethal damage may induce selection of more malignant clones. Targeting more than one pathway instead of a single agent approach may be more promising to kill GBM cells
Recommended from our members
Campath-1H immunosuppressive therapy reduces incidence and intensity of acute rejection in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation
Campath-1H, an anti-CD52 antibody, is being used at our institution as immunosuppression in multivisceral and intestinal transplantation. We reviewed the pathologic findings of 1696 small bowel allograft biopsies obtained in the first 250 days posttransplant from 78 patients who underwent isolated intestinal or multivisceral transplantation and received induction immunosuppression with Campath (n = 30) or Zenapax (n = 57). We found an overall reduced incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in patients receiving Campath (19.1%) compared with those on Zenapax (32.8%). The majority of Campath patients showed no rejection or was indeterminate for rejection over the period of measurement. The frequencies of mild and moderate ACR were approximately twice and three times more common, respectively, in Zenapax-treated patients. The mean grade of ACR in Campath patients compared with Zenapax patients was significantly lower (P <.01) during the first 6 weeks posttransplant. Thereafter, the grade of rejection in both patient groups showed fluctuation, with Zenapax patients sometimes having lower values (eg, at 2 to 4 months) than Campath patients. Patient and graft survival was not significantly different between the two groups. These data suggest that the incidence of ACR is significantly reduced with Campath during the first 2 months posttransplant, when compared with Zenapax. However, the incidence and intensity of ACR following this initial time period shows vacillation with both types of immunosuppression
Recommended from our members
Non-tuberculous mycobacterial associated enterocolitis in intestinal transplantation
Recommended from our members
Ten-year experience in porto-caval hemitransposition for liver transplantation in the presence of portal vein thrombosis
Recommended from our members
Mycophenolate mofetil rescue therapy in patients with chronic hepatic allograft rejection
Recommended from our members
Rituximab treatment for posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder after small bowel transplantation
Sirolimus (rapamycin)-based rescue treatment following chronic rejection after liver transplantation
Recommended from our members
Semiquantitative measurement of mucosal fibrosis as a means of assessing chronic injury in Bowel allografts
- …