When you hear hooves, you should look for... zebras

Not required for Clinical Vignette

Long-term morphological and hormonal follow-up in a single unit on 115 patients with adrenal incidentalomas

We investigated the natural course of adrenal incidentalomas in 115 patients by means of a long-term endocrine and morphological (CT) follow-up protocol (median 4 year, range 1–7 year). At entry, we observed 61 subclinical hormonal alterations in 43 patients (mainly concerning the ACTH–cortisol axis), but confirmatory tests always excluded specific endocrine diseases. In all cases radiologic signs of benignity were present. Mean values of the hormones examined at last follow-up did not differ from those recorded at entry. However in individual patients several variations were observed. In particular, 57 endocrine alterations found in 43 patients (37.2%) were no longer confirmed at follow-up, while 35 new alterations in 31 patients (26.9%) appeared de novo. Only four alterations in three patients (2.6%) persisted. Confirmatory tests were always negative for specific endocrine diseases. No variation in mean mass size was found between values at entry (25.4±0.9 mm) and at follow-up (25.7±0.9 mm), although in 32 patients (27.8%) mass size actually increased, while in 24 patients (20.8%) it decreased. In no case were the variations in mass dimension associated with the appearance of radiological criteria of malignancy. Kaplan–Meier curves indicated that the cumulative risk for mass enlargement (65%) and for developing endocrine abnormalities (57%) over time was progressive up to 80 months and independent of haemodynamic and humoral basal characteristics. In conclusion, mass enlargement and the presence or occurrence over time of subclinical endocrine alterations are frequent and not correlated, can appear at any time, are not associated with any basal predictor and, finally, are not necessarily indicative of malignant transformation or of progression toward overt disease

Postępowanie w chorobach tarczycy u kobiet w ciąży

The management of thyroid disorders during pregnancy is one of the most frequently disputed problems in modern endocrinology. It is widely known that thyroid dysfunction may result in subfertility, and, if inadequately treated during pregnancy, may cause obstetrical complications and influence fetal development. The 2007 Endocrine Society Practice Guideline endorsed with the participation of the Latino America Thyroid Association, the American Thyroid Association, the Asia and Oceania Thyroid Association and the European Thyroid Association, greatly contributed towards uniformity of the management of thyroid disorders during pregnancy and postpartum. Despite the tremendous progress in knowledge on the mutual influence of pregnancy and thyroid in health and disease, there are still important areas of uncertainty. There have been at least a few important studies published in the last 3 years, which influenced the thyroidal care of the expecting mother. It should also be remembered that guidelines may not always be universally applied in all populations with different ethnical, socio-economical, nutritional (including iodine intake) background or exposed to different iodine prophylaxis models. The Task Force for development of guidelines for thyroid dysfunction management in pregnant women was established in 2008. The expert group has recognized the following tasks: development of the coherent model of the management of thyroid dysfunction in pregnant women, identification of the group of women at risk of thyroid dysfunction, who may require endocrine care in the preconception period, during pregnancy and postpartum – that is in other words, the development of Polish recommendations for targeted thyroid disorder case finding during pregnancy, and the development of Polish trimester-specific reference values of thyroid hormones. Comprehensive Polish guidelines developed by the Task Force are to systematize the management of the thyroid disorders in pregnant women in Poland. (Pol J Endocrinol 2011; 62 (4): 362–381)Jednym z aktualnie szeroko dyskutowanych problemów współczesnej endokrynologii jest opieka tyreologiczna nad kobietą ciężarną. Powszechnie wiadomo, że dysfunkcja tarczycy może być przyczyną zaburzeń płodności, a nieleczona prawidłowo w czasie ciąży zwiększa ryzyko powikłań położniczych oraz ma wpływ na rozwój płodu. Opublikowane w 2007 roku wytyczne Towarzystwa Endokrynologicznego (Endocrine Society), opracowane przy współudziale Towarzystwa Tyreologicznego Ameryki Łacińskiej (LATS), Towarzystwa Tyreologicznego Azji i Oceanii (AOTA), Amerykańskiego Towarzystwa Tyreologicznego (ATA) oraz Europejskiego Towarzystwa Tyreologicznego (ETA), w dużym stopniu usystematyzowały zasady postępowania w chorobach tarczycy w czasie ciąży i w okresie poporodowym. Pomimo ogromnego postępu wiedzy na temat wzajemnego wpływu ciąży i funkcji gruczołu tarczowego w zdrowiu i chorobie, jaki osiągnięto w ciągu ostatnich kilkunastu lat, nadal pewne obszary wymagają dalszych badań. W ciągu 3 lat, które minęły od publikacji wytycznych, przybyło danych, które wpłynęły na niektóre zasady prowadzenia ciężarnej z chorobą tarczycy. Wytyczne nie zawsze mają charakter uniwersalny i nie mogą być w prosty sposób transponowane na społeczeństwa zróżnicowane etnicznie i ekonomicznie, o odmiennych zwyczajach dietetycznych, w tym w spożyciu nośników jodu, oraz stosujące odmienne modele profilaktyki jodowej. W 2008 roku powołano Zespół Ekspertów do spraw Opieki Tyreologicznej w Ciąży. Za cele prac Zespołu przyjęto: opracowanie modelu opieki nad ciężarną z zaburzeniami funkcji tarczycy, określenie grupy kobiet z ryzykiem zaburzeń funkcji tarczycy wymagających oceny tyreologicznej podczas planowania ciąży, w trakcie jej trwania oraz w okresie poporodowym — czyli przygotowanie polskich wskazań do badań przesiewowych oraz ustalenie wartości referencyjnych stężeń hormonów tarczycy w poszczególnych trymestrach ciąży. Opracowane przez Zespół wytyczne systematyzują zasady opieki tyreologicznej nad kobietą ciężarną w Polsce. (Endokrynol Pol 2011; 62 (4): 362–381

Delayed diagnosis of adrenal hypoplasia congenita in a patient with a new mutation in the NR0B1 gene

Determining the precise cause of adrenal insufficiency occurring in infancy is of critical importance for both the correct management of affected children and the provision of correct genetic advice to their families. We report a case of a 24-year-old, male patient bearing a new mutation in the DAX1 gene. The patient was born at term, from a healthy pregnancy. Adrenal insufficiency was diagnosed in the fourth week of life with a salt-wasting syndrome, but it was mistakenly believed to be secondary to congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). On hydrocortisone substitution, the child continued to develop normally, but the diagnosis of CAH was questioned, which led to an episode of an abrupt withdrawal of hydrocortisone substitution and subsequently caused a reoccurrence of a life-threatening salt-wasting syndrome. Owing to close follow-up, the patient's gonadal axis deficiency was promptly identified, which allowed an assisted but successful onset of puberty. We proposed the diagnosis of adrenal hypoplasia congenita (AHC) in this patient and identified a hemizygous mutation (c.1130delAinsGT, p.E377GfsX12) in exon 1 of the NR0B1 gene. To our knowledge, the detected mutation has not been described previously (HGMD Professional 2010.4, Human Gene Mutation Database, Biobase, Beverly, MA, USA). It leads to a frameshift, a premature stop codon, and, most likely, non-sense-mediated decay of the mutant mRNA. In this case, close patient follow-up minimized the detrimental consequences of an incorrect diagnosis. Nevertheless, it highlights the importance of the early precise diagnosis of patients with AHC

Prognostic value of the apoptotic index analysed jointly with selected cell cycle regulators and proliferation markers in non-small cell lung cancer.

In a previous small series of surgically treated non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC), we found that higher apoptotic index (AI) negatively influenced survival (Dworakowska D, Jassem E, Jassem J, Karmolinski A, Dworakowski R, Wirth T, et al. Clinical significance of apoptotic index in non-small cell lung cancer: correlation with p53, mdm2, pRb and p21WAF1/CIP1 protein expression. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2005; 131:617-623.). In this study we attempted to verify our previous finding in larger group of 170 NSCLC cases, additionally correlating AI to selected cell cycle regulators as well as a proliferation marker. Apoptosis was assessed with the use of the TUNEL technique, whereas the expression of p53, pRb, mdm2, p21(WAF1/CIP1), cyclin D1 and PCNA were assessed immunohistochemically. The mean and the median AI was 12 and 8, respectively. The expression of p53, pRb, mdm2, p21(WAF1/CIP1) proteins and cyclin D1 was found in 47%, 71%, 37%, 65% and 40% of cases, respectively. The mean and the median PCNA labeling index (PCNA LI) was 34 and 35, respectively. AI was not correlated with any patient characteristic or other tumor markers. In uni- and multivariate analysis AI, analysed separately or jointly with cell cycle regulators and PCNA LI, did not influence disease-free or over-all survival. However, patients with "very high AI/very high PCNA LI" had a particularly poor prognosis (P=0.001). Patients with "very low AI/negative pRb" phenotype survived for a shorter time in comparison to others (P=0.04). In addition, patients with the highest PCNA LI had a worse outcome in comparison to patients with the lowest PCNA LI (P=0.04), especially those with concomitant p53 protein expression (P=0.026) or lacking pRb protein expression (P=0.04). This study demonstrates that joint analysis of several factors involved in apoptosis, proliferation and cell cycle regulation, but not AI alone, might provide additional prognostic information in NSCLC patients