Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in Washington, D.C.: Prevalence of antiretroviral resistance in treatment naïve patients from 2007 to 2010

HIV treatment has been greatly impacted by transmitted resistance to antiretrovirals (ARV). Several studies have documented resistance in naïve individuals and estimates of transmitted drug resistance mutations range from \u3c5% to as high as 25%. Washington, D.C. has one of the highest human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence rates in the United States (3.2% in 2009), but local data regarding the frequency of major mutations and antiretroviral (ARV) resistance has been limited. Medical records of HIV positive, ARV-naïve adults at two facilities in Washington, D.C., The George Washington University Medical Center and the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, were retrospectively analyzed in subjects who had genotypic resistance testing from 2007 to 2010. Of 407 ARV-naïve patients, at least one transmitted drug resistance mutation was detected in 17% of our patients, with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NNRTI) mutations observed in 15%. Among patients with at least one reverse transcriptase (RT) or major protease region (Pr) resistance mutation, 85% had resistance against a single ARV class. Dual and triple class resistance mutations were seen in 8 patients (2%) and 3 patients (0.7%), respectively. Most of the multiple class resistance was seen in 2010. A gradual increase in NNRTI resistance was noted during 2008 to 2010. Our prevalence of transmitted RT, major Pr mutations (17.4%) and ARV resistance (8.6%) were high but similar to rates reported by others within the United States. Given the high HIV prevalence in the District of Columbia, this has important implications for treatment of these ARV-naïve patients

Characteristics and severity of disease among 100 cases of imported Malaria seen at a U.S. University Hospital, 2000–2017

Copyright © 2018 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Malaria acquired in endemic areas poses a substantial risk to travelers arriving in or returning to the United States. Timely diagnosis and recognition of severe illness are crucial; however, many U.S.-based clinicians lack familiarity with this disease. We conducted a retrospective review of 100 cases of malaria in adults seen at a single urban university hospital during 2000–2017. Descriptive and analytical statistics were calculated, including logistic regression modeling case severity. Most of the patients presented with Plasmodium falciparum (76%), most commonly after travel from sub-Saharan Africa (94%). Prior malaria experience was common (50%), but adherence to a prophylactic regimen was exceedingly rare (4%). Twenty-one patients had severe malaria, including 10 with cerebral malaria. Severity was predicted by high parasitemia, bandemia, hypoglycemia, and hypotension at the time of presentation. In 24 patients, the initial treatment regimen was changed, usually because of the appearance of clinical deterioration or drug toxicity. One patient required intravenous artesunate. All patients survived, although one suffered fetal loss. Among 30 patients initially evaluated at other institutions, 43% had been treated for an alternative diagnosis. The most common reasons for transfer of patients to our hospital were inadequate facilities and lack of expertise with malaria. There needs to be increased awareness among U.S.-based travelers and clinicians regarding malaria as a potentially lethal condition, emphasizing the use of appropriate prophylaxis. Our simple model of disease severity could serve frontline physicians when deciding which patients should be admitted to the intensive care unit or transferred for higher level care