Neurophysiology

Contains reports on twenty research projects.Bell Laboratories (Grant)National Institutes of Health (Grant 5 R01 EY01149-03S2)National Institutes of Health (Grant 5 TO1 EY00090-04)National Institutes of Health (Grant 5 RO1 NS12307-03)National Institutes of Health (Grant K04 NS00010)National Multiple Sclerosis Society (Grant RG-1133-A-1)Health Sciences Fund (Grant 78-10

Neurophysiology

Contains research objectives and summary of research on sixteen research projects.National Institutes of Health (Grant 5 TO1 EY00090-03)National Institutes of Health (Grant 3 RO1 EY01149-03S1)Bell Laboratories (Grant)National Institutes of Health (Grant 5 RO1 NS12307-02)National Institutes of Health (Grant K04 NS00010

Neurophysiology

Contains research objectives and summary of research on seventeen research projects and reports on four research projects.National Institutes of Health (Grant 5 TOl EY00090-02)Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. (Grant)National Institutes of Health (Grant 5 ROI EY01149-03)National Institutes of Health (Grant NS 12307-01)National Institutes of Health (Grant 1 K04 NS00010

Stimulus generalization and transfer of training in rabbits conditioned to electrical stimulation of lateral geniculate nucleus

Rabbits were classically conditioned by pairing electrical stimulation of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) with peripheral electric shock as the unconditioned stimulus. In Experiment 1 generalization and transfer of training between contralateral LGN were examined. In Experiment 2 frequency generalization gradients were examined with total stimulus energy (TSE) either varied or kept constant. The chief findings of Experiment 1 were that (a) reliable eyeblink and heart rate conditioning were observed, and (b) transfer of training, but not stimulus generalization occurred between LGN. This transfer was specifically due to the previous conditioning. In Experiment 2 response frequency of unconditioned eye openings to LGN stimulation varied as a function of stimulus frequency. In contrast, the highest response frequency for conditioned eyelid closings during generalization testing occurred at the stimulus frequency used during training provided that TSE was kept constant; some generalization occurred to higher and lower stimulus frequencies. When frequency was varied without keeping TSE constant, the highest response rates occurred at stimulus frequencies higher than the training stimulus