256 research outputs found

    Characterization of Ex Vivo Expanded Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes from Patients with Malignant Melanoma for Clinical Application

    Get PDF
    Clinical trials of adoptive transfer of autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) to patients with advanced malignant melanoma have shown remarkable results with objective clinical responses in 50% of the treated patients. In order to initiate a clinical trial in melanoma, we have established a method for expanding TILs to clinical relevant quantities in two steps with in 8 weeks. Further characterization of expanded TILs revealed an oligoclonal composition of T-cells with an effector memory like phenotype. When autologous tumor was available, TILs showed specific activity in all patients tested. TIL cultures contained specificity towards tumor cells as well as peptides derived from tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) during expansion procedures

    Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines in Combination with Conventional Therapy

    Get PDF
    The clinical efficacy of most therapeutic vaccines against cancer has not yet met its promise. Data are emerging that strongly support the notion that combining immunotherapy with conventional therapies, for example, radiation and chemotherapy may improve efficacy. In particular combination with chemotherapy may lead to improved clinical efficacy by clearing suppressor cells, reboot of the immune system, by rendering tumor cells more susceptible to immune mediated killing, or by activation of cells of the immune system. In addition, a range of tumor antigens have been characterized to allow targeting of proteins coupled to intrinsic properties of cancer cells. For example, proteins associated with drug resistance can be targeted, and form ideal target structures for use in combination with chemotherapy for killing of surviving drug resistant cancer cells. Proteins associated with the malignant phenotype can be targeted to specifically target cancer cells, but proteins targeted by immunotherapy may also simultaneously target cancer cells as well as suppressive cells in the tumor stroma

    Selective costimulation by IL-15R/IL-15, but not IL-2R/IL-2, allows the induction of high numbers of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells by human dendritic cells matured in conditions of acute inflammation

    Get PDF
    Conventional dendritic cells (DC) are believed to rely on membrane-bound IL-2Rα to trans-present soluble IL-2 and costimulate T cell activation and expansion. In contrast, Langerhans cells have been shown to use membrane-bound IL-15Rα/IL-15 complex to activate T cells. Here we show that, while the expansion of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells by DC matured in the presence of chronic inflammatory mediators (PGE2, TNFα IL-1β, IL-6) fully depends on expression of IL-2Rα, CD8+ T cell expansion induced by IL-12p70-producing DC matured by interferon's and Toll-Like receptor ligands (type-1-polarized; DC1) is both more effective and independent of IL-2Rα expression. While DC1-expressed IL-15Rα promotes the expansion of tetramer-specific CD8+ T cells, their secreted levels of IL-12p70 determines the degree of CD8+ T cell functionality as evidenced by tumor antigen-specific release of IFNγ and TNFα. In accordance with the in vivo advantage of utilizing an IL-2-independent pathway of costimulation of tumor-specific T cells, in a retrospectively analyzed cohort of patients with metastatic malignant melanoma treated with cyclophosphamide and tumor-antigen transfected DCs (NCT00978913) we observed a highly significant inverse relation between overall survival and expression of IL-2Rα on DC vaccine products (p = 0.009). The differential usage of IL-2Rα/IL-2 versus IL-15Rα/IL-15 pathways by subsets of DCs helps to explain the role of different types of inflammation in memory formation, exhaustion of CD8+ T cell responses and progression of cancer. Furthermore, ex vivo induction of IL-15Rα/IL-15 dependent signaling might improve adoptive T cell therapies targeting tumors with well-defined and undefined tumor rejection antigens

    Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment and ophthalmologist consultations in patients with malignant melanoma or lung cancer—A nationwide cohort study

    Get PDF
    SIMPLE SUMMARY: Immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly being used for treating advanced malignant cutaneous melanoma and lung cancer. Immune-related side effects in multiple organs are common but the frequencies of ophthalmic side effects in national cohorts of unselected patients are undescribed. This study estimated frequencies of first-time ophthalmologist consultations and inflammatory conditions in consecutive patients with malignant melanoma or lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in Denmark from 2011–2018. The one-year risks of first-time consultation and ocular inflammation were 6% and 1%, respectively. These numbers were increased compared with patients with the same type of cancer who were not treated with immune checkpoint inhibitiors. ABSTRACT: Purpose: To estimate the frequency of first-time ocular events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Methods: Patients with cancer in 2011–2018 in Denmark were included and followed. The outcomes were first-time ophthalmologist consultation and ocular inflammation. One-year absolute risks of outcomes and hazard ratios were estimated. Results: 112,289 patients with cancer were included, and 2195 were treated with ICI. One year after the first ICI treatment, 6% of the patients with cancer, 5% and 8% of the lung cancer (LC) and malignant cutaneous melanoma (MM) patients, respectively, had a first-time ophthalmologist consultation. The risk of ocular inflammation was 1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4–1.2). Among patients with MM, ICI was associated with ocular inflammation in women (HR 12.6 (95% CI 5.83–27.31) and men (4.87 (95% CI 1.79–13.29)). Comparing patients with and without ICI treatment, the risk of first-time ophthalmologist consultation was increased in patients with LC (HR 1.74 (95% CI 1.29–2.34) and MM (HR 3.21 (95% CI 2.31–4.44). Conclusions: The one-year risks of first-time ophthalmologist consultation and ocular inflammation were 6% and 1%, respectively, in patients treated with ICI. In patients with LC and MM, the risk was increased in patients with ICI compared with patients without ICI
    corecore