1 research outputs found

    Renal impairment after switching from stavudine/lamivudine to tenofovir/lamivudine in NNRTI-based antiretroviral regimens

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>During stavudine phase-out plan in developing countries, tenofovir is used to substitute stavudine. However, knowledge regarding whether there is any difference of the frequency of renal injury between tenofovir/lamivudine/efavirenz and tenofovir/lamivudine/nevirapine is lacking.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This prospective study was conducted among HIV-infected patients who were switched NRTI from stavudine/lamivudine to tenofovir/lamivudine in efavirenz-based (EFV group) and nevirapine-based regimen (NVP group) after two years of an ongoing randomized trial. All patients were assessed for serum phosphorus, uric acid, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urinalysis at time of switching, 12 and 24 weeks.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of 62 patients, 28 were in EFV group and 34 were in NVP group. Baseline characteristics and eGFR were not different between two groups. At 12 weeks, comparing mean ± SD measures between EFV group and NVP group were: phosphorus of 3.16 ± 0.53 vs. 2.81 ± 0.42 mg/dL (<it>P </it>= 0.005), %patients with proteinuria were 15% vs. 38% (<it>P </it>= 0.050). At 24 weeks, mean ± SD phosphorus and median (IQR) eGFR between the corresponding groups were 3.26 ± 0.78 vs. 2.84 ± 0.47 mg/dL (<it>P </it>= 0.011) and 110 (99-121) vs. 98 (83-112) mL/min (<it>P </it>= 0.008). In NVP group, comparing week 12 to time of switching, there was a decrement of phosphorus (<it>P </it>= 0.007) and eGFR (<it>P </it>= 0.034). By multivariate analysis, 'receiving nevirapine', 'old age' and 'low baseline serum phosphorus' were associated with hypophosphatemia at 24 weeks (<it>P </it>< 0.05). Receiving nevirapine and low baseline eGFR were associated with lower eGFR at 24 weeks (<it>P </it>< 0.05).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The frequency of tenofovir-associated renal impairment was higher in patients receiving tenofovir/lamivudine/nevirapine compared to tenofovir/lamivudine/efavirenz. Further studies regarding patho-physiology are warranted.</p
    corecore