4 research outputs found

    āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļĢāļĩāļĒāļšāđ€āļ—āļĩāļĒāļšāļœāļĨāļŠāļąāļĄāļĪāļ—āļ˜āļīāđŒāļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡āļ™āļąāļāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļŠāļąāđ‰āļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āļ–āļĄāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ›āļĩāļ—āļĩāđˆ 3 āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļˆāļēāļāļ„āļ­āļĄāļžāļīāļ§āđ€āļ•āļ­āļĢāđŒāļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļŠāļ­āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļšāļĢāļĢāļĒāļēāļĒāđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļ‡āđ€āļ”āđ‡āļāļāļąāļšāđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļœāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŦāļāđˆ

    Get PDF
    The objective of this research was to compare learning achievements of Prathomsuksa 3 (Grade 3) students using computer-assisted instruction with different narrative voices. The sample group consisted of 60 students from Prathomsuksa 3 (Grade 3) Level of Anuban Krabi School in 2016 academic year obtained by mean of Simple Random Sampling of the total population of 173 students. They were then separated into 2 experimental groups, 30 students each. The first group learned from computer-assisted instruction with child narrator’s voice while the second group learned from computer-assisted instruction with adult narrator’s voice. The research tools were the computerassisted instruction with child narrator’s voice, the computer-assisted instruction with adult narrator’s voice and a post-test. The data were analyzed using arithmetic mean, standard deviation and t-test. The research results showed that learning achievement of students learned from computer-assisted instruction with child narrator’s voice did not significantly differ from that of students learned from computer-assisted instruction with adult narrator’s voice

    āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļœāļĨāļŠāļąāļĄāļĪāļ—āļ˜āļīāđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ™āļąāļāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļĢāļ°āļ”āļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļĒāļ­āļĄāļĢāļąāļšāđ€āļ—āļ„āđ‚āļ™āđ‚āļĨāļĒāļĩāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļąāļ™āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļēāļ”āļāļēāļĢāđŒāļ•āļđāļ™

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this research was to compare the students learning achievements via mobile learning with different levels of technology adoption. They were divided into 3 groups: low level of technology adoption, moderate level of technology adoption, and high level of technology adoption. Subjects were 100 Mathayomsuksa 5 students of Visuttarangsi School, Kanchanaburi province, in the first semester of 2016 academic year. The research instruments were mobile learning on cartoon drawing, Technology acceptance test, pretest, posttest, and performance assessment form. The statistics employed was one way ANOVA. The research result revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between Mathayomsuksa 5 students with different levels of technology adoption at .05 level

    āļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāđ€āļĨāļīāļĢāđŒāļ™āļ™āļīāļ‡ āļ­āļ­āļ›āđ€āļˆāđ‡āļāļ•āđŒ āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡ āļ­āļīāļ™āđ‚āļ”āļˆāļĩāļ™ āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļšāļ™āļąāļāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļŠāļąāđ‰āļ™āļĄāļąāļ˜āļĒāļĄāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ›āļĩāļ—āļĩāđˆ 1

    No full text
    The purposes of the research were 1) to develop Learning Object on Indochina for Mathayomsuksa 1;students with quality level as “good” according to experts evaluation, 2) to compare the students pre-test;scores and post-test scores, and 3) to study the students satisfaction on the developed Learning Object.;The subject was 30 Mathayomsuksa 1 students at Khamsakaesaeng School Nakhon Ratchasima;Province. The research tools utilized in this study were Learning Object, pre-test, post-test, and;questionnaires. The data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, and t-test.;The research results were 1) the developed Learning Object was evaluated by content expert as “very;good” level, and technical expert as “good” level of quality, 2) the students post-test scores after studying;through Learning Object were statistically significant higher than the students pre-test scores at .05 level, and;3) the students satisfaction on developed Learning Object was at very good level
    corecore