15 research outputs found

    Race as a factor in donor selection and survival of children with hematologic malignancies undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant in Florida

    No full text
    Background Previous studies have explored posthematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) outcomes by race in adults; however, pediatric data addressing this topic are scarce. Procedure This retrospective registry study included 238 White (W) and 57 Black (B) children with hematologic malignancies (HM) receiving first allogeneic HCT between 2010 and 2019 at one of the five Florida pediatric HCT centers. Results We found no differences between W and B children in transplant characteristics, other than donor type. There was a significant difference in use of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)‐mismatched donors (HLA‐MMD) (53% W, 71% B, p = .01). When comparing HLA‐MMD use to fully HLA‐matched donors, B had relative risk (RR) of 1.47 (95% CI 0.7–3) of receiving a mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD), RR of 2.34 (95% CI 1.2–4.4) of receiving a mismatched related donor (MMRD), and RR of 1.9 (95% CI 0.99–3.6) of receiving a mismatched cord blood donor (MMCBD) HCT, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of aGVHD (48% W, 35% B), p = .1, or cGVHD (19% W, 28% B, p = .1), or primary cause of death. Overall 24‐month survival was 61% (95% CI 55%–68%) for W, and 60% (95% CI 48–75) for B children, log‐rank p = .7. While HLA matching improved survival in W children, the number of B children receiving HLA‐matched HCT was too small to identify the impact of HLA matching on survival. Conclusions In this contemporary cohort of children with HM, we found that B children were more likely to receive HLA‐MMD transplants, but this did not adversely affect survival or GVHD rates

    Early mixed chimerism‐based preemptive immunotherapy in children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia

    No full text
    This retrospective analysis comprises 10-year experience with early posttransplant mixed chimerism-based preemptive intervention. Out of 104 patients, 51 received preemptive immunotherapy. Their outcomes were similar to patients achieving full donor chimerism spontaneously. Among patients receiving intervention, 5-year event-free survival was identical in patients with and without pretransplant residual disease, respectively (68% [95% confidence interval (CI) 38-98%] vs. 69% [95% CI 54-85%] log-rank = 0.4). In patients who received preemptive immunotherapy, chimerism status and residual disease prior to transplant were no longer predictors of poor outcome; however, 41% of the patients with residual disease prior to transplant relapsed early and did not benefit from this strategy

    Pediatric HCT in Florida (2014 ‐2016): A report from the FPBCC

    No full text
    FPBCC was formed in 2018 by five pediatric transplant programs in Florida. One of the key objectives of the consortium is to provide outcome analyses by combining HCT data from all the participating centers in order to identify areas for improvement. In this first FPBCC landscape report we describe the patient and transplant characteristics of pediatric patients undergoing first allo and auto HCT between 2014 and 2016 in Florida. The source of data was eDBtC of the CIBMTR. Over the span of 3 years, a total of 230 pediatric patients underwent allo-HCT and 104 underwent auto-HCT at the participating centers. The most significant predictor of survival in allo-HCT recipients with malignant disorders was the degree of HLA- match, while in the recipients of allo-HCT with non-malignant disorders the predictors of survival included age, donor relationship and degree of HLA match. Our analyses identified the need to improve reporting of primary cause of death and improve on donor selection process given that the degree of HLA match remains the most important predictor of survival. This first FPBCC-wide review describes the trends in pediatric HCT activity between 2014 and 2016 among the participating centers in Florida and confirms feasibility of using eDBtC data platform and collaborative approach in order to identify areas for improvement in outcomes
    corecore