Food waste composting

The objective of this thesis was to increase our knowledge of issues relevant to process problems in large-scale composting. The investigations focused on acid-related process inhibition and the relationships between temperature, aeration, evaporation and the scale of the process. Three manuscripts are summarised in the thesis proper. The first investigated composting at different scales; at full-scale, in a 2 m high reactor and in a one-litre vessel. The process in the reactor resembled the full-scale process, but the theoretical calculations showed that the heat losses from the reactor were large. About 0.45 m of glass wool would be necessary to produce similar thermal properties in the reactor as in the full scale plant. Accumulation of acids was studied in the second investigation. Different amounts of active compost were used as a starting culture in rotating three-litre reactors, which were fed daily with fresh waste and water. In reactors with a large amount of starting culture, more than four times the daily feed, a well-functioning process with high temperature, high CO2 production and high pH was established. In reactors with a starting culture less than twice the daily feed, the composting process failed. The temperature was below 42 °C and the CO2 production was small. In these reactors the pH was low and organic acids accumulated. It was concluded that acid inhibition of fed-batch processes can be avoided if sufficient amounts of a good starting culture are used. In the third investigation, the combined effects of temperature and pH on the degradation were studied. Small samples of compost from the initial acidic phase were treated with sodium hydroxide to raise the pH. This resulted in high respiratory activity in samples at all pH levels at 36 °C and in those with pH over 6.5 at 46 °C. However, at 46 °C the activity was very low in samples with pH below 6.0. This shows that a combination of high temperature and low pH can inhibit the composting process. The influence of the composting temperature on the evaporation was also analysed. Simulations showed that the difference in evaporation at different temperatures was very small for the same degradation, although there were large variations in airflow. Finally, addition of water to compost is discussed. It is often necessary to add water when composting energy-rich substrates, since otherwise the process may be halted due to drying before the compost has stabilised

Long-term viability of biochar-producing gasifier stoves for energy and agricultural solutions in rural Kenya

This report examines the long-term usage and satisfaction levels of a biochar-producing gasifier stove among rural households in Kenya. The primary objective was to investigate the factors that influence stove satisfaction and dissatisfaction among participants, with the aim of assessing the gasifier stove's viability as an alternative for rural households. Data for this study was collected from representatives from 30 households through surveybased interviews covering cooking practices, fuel collection, and user experiences with the gasifier stove six years after receiving it. The findings indicate that households typically use multiple stoves. Almost all participants used the three stone stove on a daily basis, while the gasifier stove had a lower use frequency. Although households acknowledged the benefits of the gasifier stove, they expressed difficulties in relying on it as their primary cooking appliance due to its lack of convenience. The main contributing factors were the additional workload required for fuel preparation and the extended cooking time. Participants prepared various dishes using the gasifier stove, and the char produced by the stove was utilized for cooking, farming, and other purposes. The differences between users and non -users in terms of perception of stove benefits were small, though users appreciated the biochar production more than non -users. The study offers insights into the long-term usage of the gasifier stove and its dual potential as a clean cooking solution, and a biochar-producing technology, for rural households across the world

Food waste composting

The objective of this thesis was to increase our knowledge of issues relevant to process problems in large-scale composting. The investigations focused on acidrelated process inhibition and the relationships between temperature, aeration, evaporation and the scale of the process. Three manuscripts are summarised in the thesis proper. The first investigated composting at different scales; at full-scale, in a 2 m high reactor and in a one-litre vessel. The process in the reactor resembled the full-scale process, but the theoretical calculations showed that the heat losses from the reactor were large. About 0.45 m of glass wool would be necessary to produce similar thermal properties in the reactor as in the full scale plant. Accumulation of acids was studied in the second investigation. Different amounts of active compost were used as a starting culture in rotating three-litre reactors, which were fed daily with fresh waste and water. In reactors with a large amount of starting culture, more than four times the daily feed, a well-functioning process with high temperature, high CO2 production and high pH was established. In reactors with a starting culture less than twice the daily feed, the composting process failed. The temperature was below 42 °C and the CO2 production was small. In these reactors the pH was low and organic acids accumulated. It was concluded that acid inhibition of fed-batch processes can be avoided if sufficient amounts of a good starting culture are used. In the third investigation, the combined effects of temperature and pH on the degradation were studied. Small samples of compost from the initial acidic phase were treated with sodium hydroxide to raise the pH. This resulted in high respiratory activity in samples at all pH levels at 36 °C and in those with pH over 6.5 at 46 °C. However, at 46 °C the activity was very low in samples with pH below 6.0. This shows that a combination of high temperature and low pH can inhibit the composting process. The influence of the composting temperature on the evaporation was also analysed. Simulations showed that the difference in evaporation at different temperatures was very small for the same degradation, although there were large variations in airflow. Finally, addition of water to compost is discussed. It is often necessary to add water when composting energy-rich substrates, since otherwise the process may be halted due to drying before the compost has stabilised

Climate impact of bioenergy with or without carbon dioxide removal: influence of functional unit and parameter variability

PurposeBioenergy with carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is increasingly proposed as an efficient way to mitigate climate change. This study examined the circumstances and methodological choices in which two CDR bioenergy systems were preferable to a reference bioenergy system from a climate change mitigation perspective. The CDR systems were also compared.MethodsThree systems were modelled: two CDR systems (Biochar, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)), with a combined heat and power (CHP) system as reference. A parameterised life cycle inventory (LCI) model was developed and computed for all systems and four different functional units (FUs), resulting in different distributions of climate impacts. Contribution analysis was performed, followed by pair-wise comparison of all scenarios to establish their ranking. First-order Sobol indices were computed to assess the contribution of each parameter to total variance. When ranking of scenarios was strongly dependent on parameter values, decision tree analysis was applied.Results and discussionThe CDR systems had a lower climate impact than CHP in most computations, across all FUs. On comparing the two CDR systems, the preferable system changed with FU. With heat or carbon sequestration as FU the Biochar system was preferable in general, while with electricity or biomass use as FU, the BECCS system had the lowest climate impact in most computations. For most system configurations, energy substitutions had a large influence and contributed most to the variance in results. The system ranking also depended on the reference activities in the background energy system.ConclusionsThe Biochar and BECCS systems were generally preferable to the reference CHP system from a climate mitigation perspective, particularly when the reference energy systems had a relatively low climate impact. However, FU and parameters affected the system ranking. For comparing BECCS and biochar, case-specific climate impacts will be decisive, but not always conclusive, as the choice of FU has such large impact on the results.RecommendationsWhen conducting LCA of multi-functional systems, the use of several FUs, parameterised LCI, and contribution analysis allows for deeper investigation than conventional sensitivity analyses. When analysing the climate impact of bioenergy with or without carbon removal, it is especially important to perform sensitivity analysis on the energy background system, since it strongly affects the results

Small-scale biochar production on Swedish farms

Several small-scale pyrolysis plants have been installed on Swedish farms and the trend is also expanding in the Nordic countries. These projects are driven by ambitions of achieving carbon dioxide removal, reducing environmental impacts and improving farmers’ economy and resilience. The pyrolysis plants are fuelled with either commercial pellets or agricultural residues. The pyrolysis plants co-produce heat for the farm’s buildings, biochar for non-oxidative applications, mostly agricultural ones, and electricity in some cases. In the Nordic context, on-farm biochar production potential is thus linked to energy consumption. The main research question investigated is whether farms producing biochar can meet their own biochar needs in an energy-efficient way. The research also provides insights on how biochar production at various scales, centralized and decentralized, can be integrated in a given landscape. Please click Additional Files below to see the full abstract

Assessing the diverse environmental effects of biochar systems: An evaluation framework

Biochar has been recognised as a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technology. Unlike other CDR technologies, biochar is expected to deliver various valuable effects in e.g. agriculture, animal husbandry, industrial processes, remediation activities and waste management. The diversity of biochar side effects to CDR makes the systematic environmental assessment of biochar projects challenging, and to date, there is no common framework for evaluating them. Our aim is to bridge the methodology gap for evaluating biochar systems from a life-cycle perspective. Using life cycle theory, actual biochar projects, and reviews of biochar research, we propose a general description of biochar systems, an overview of biochar effects, and an evaluation framework for biochar effects. The evaluation framework was applied to a case study, the Stockholm Biochar Project. In the framework, biochar effects are classified according to life cycle stage and life cycle effect type; and the biochar?s end-of-life and the reference situations are made explicit. Three types of effects are easily included in life cycle theory: changes in biosphere exchanges, technosphere inputs, and technosphere outputs. For other effects, analysing the cause-effect chain may be helpful. Several biochar effects in agroecosystems can be modelled as future productivity increases against a reference situation. In practice, the complexity of agroecosystems can be bypassed by using empirical models. Existing biochar life cycle studies are often limited to carbon footprint calculations and quantify a limited amount of biochar effects, mainly carbon sequestration, energy displacements and fertiliser-related emissions. The methodological development in this study can be of benefit to the biochar and CDR research communities, as well as decision-makers in biochar practice and policy

Life cycle assessment of urban uses of biochar and case study in Uppsala, Sweden

Biochar is a material derived from biomass pyrolysis that is used in urban applications. The environmental impacts of new biochar products have however not been assessed. Here, the life cycle assessments of 5 biochar products (tree planting, green roofs, landscaping soil, charcrete, and biofilm carrier) were performed for 7 biochar supply-chains in 2 energy contexts. The biochar products were benchmarked against reference products and oxidative use of biochar for steel production. Biochar demand was then estimated, using dynamic material flow analysis, for a new city district in Uppsala, Sweden. In a decarbonised energy system and with high biochar stability, all biochar products showed better climate performance than the reference products, and most applications outperformed biomass use for decarbonising steel production. The climate benefits of using biochar ranged from - 1.4 to - 0.11 tonne CO2-eq tonne(-1) biochar in a decarbonised energy system. In other environmental impact categories, biochar products had either higher or lower impacts than the reference products, depending on biochar supply chain and material substituted, with trade-offs between sectors and impact categories. However, several use-phase effects of biochar were not included in the assessment due to knowledge limitations. In Uppsala's new district, estimated biochar demand was around 1700 m(3) year(-1) during the 25 years of construction. By 2100, 23% of this biochar accumulated in landfill, raising questions about end-of-life management of biochar-containing products. Overall, in a post-fossil economy, biochar can be a carbon dioxide removal technology with benefits, but biochar applications must be designed to maximise co-benefits

Climate impact of willow grown for bioenergy in Sweden

Short-rotation coppice willow (SRCW) is a fast-growing and potentially high-yielding energy crop. Transition to bioenergy has been identified in Sweden as one strategy to mitigate climate change and decrease the current dependency on fossil fuel. In this study, life cycle assessment was used to evaluate and compare the climate impacts of SRCW systems, for the purpose of evaluating key factors influencing the climate change mitigation potential of SRCW grown on agricultural land in Sweden. Seven different scenarios were defined and analysed to identify the factors with the most influence on the climate. A carbon balance model was used to model carbon fluxes between soil, biomass and atmosphere under Swedish growing conditions. The results indicated that SRCW can act as a temporary carbon sink and therefore has a mitigating effect on climate change. The most important factor in obtaining a high climate change-mitigating effect was shown to be high yield. Low yield gave the worst mitigating effect of the seven scenarios, but it was still better than the effect of the reference systems, district heating produced from coal or natural gas