A rational engineering strategy for designing protein a-binding camelid single-domain antibodies

Staphylococcal protein A (SpA) and streptococcal protein G (SpG) affinity chromatography are the gold standards for purifying monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in therapeutic applications. However, camelid VHH single-domain Abs (sdAbs or VHHs) are not bound by SpG and only sporadically bound by SpA. Currently, VHHs require affinity tag-based purification, which limits their therapeutic potential and adds considerable complexity and cost to their production. Here we describe a simple and rapid mutagenesis-based approach designed to confer SpA binding upon a priori non-SpA-binding VHHs. We show that SpA binding of VHHs is determined primarily by the same set of residues as in human mAbs, albeit with an unexpected degree of tolerance to substitutions at certain core and non-core positions and some limited dependence on at least one residue outside the SpA interface, and that SpA binding could be successfully introduced into five VHHs against three different targets with no adverse effects on expression yield or antigen binding. Next-generation sequencing of llama, alpaca and dromedary VHH repertoires suggested that species differences in SpA binding may result from frequency variation in specific deleterious polymorphisms, especially Ile57. Thus, the SpA binding phenotype of camelid VHHs can be easily modulated to take advantage of tag-less purification techniques, although the frequency with which this is required may depend on the source species

Role of the non-hypervariable FR3 D-E loop in single-domain antibody recognition of haptens and carbohydrates

Single-domain antibodies (sdAbs), the variable domains of camelid heavy chain-only antibodies, are generally thought to poorly recognize nonproteinaceous small molecules and carbohydrates in comparison with conventional antibodies. However, the structures of anti-methotrexate, anti-triclocarban and anti-cortisol sdAbs revealed unexpected contributions of the non-hypervariable “CDR4” loop, formed between β-strands D and E of framework region 3, in binding. Here, we investigated the potential role of CDR4 in sdAb binding to a hapten, 15-acetyl-deoxynivalenol (15-AcDON), and to carbohydrates. We constructed and panned a phage-displayed library in which CDR4 of the 15-AcDON-specific sdAb, NAT-267, was extended and randomized. From this library, we identified one sdAb, MA-232, bearing a 14-residue insertion in CDR4 and showing improved binding to 15-AcDON by ELISA and surface plasmon resonance. On the basis of these results, we constructed a second set of phage-displayed libraries in which the CDR4 and other regions of three hapten- or carbohydrate-binding sdAbs were diversified. With the goal of identifying sdAbs with novel glycan-binding specificities, we panned the library against four tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens but were unable to enrich binding phages. Thus, we conclude that while CDR4 may play a role in binding of some rare hapten