A challenging diagnosis of rare co-existent multiple myeloma and prostate adenocarcinoma: a systematic review of case reports

Objective: To review biochemical parameters, clinical characteristics, demographics, radiological and histopathological findings, treatment modalities and outcomes used to examine patients with coexisting multiple myeloma and prostate adencocarcinoma. Method: The systematic review comprised search on PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct and the Directory of Open Access Journal databases for case reports published till June 1, 2022. The search was done in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using appropriate key words. Case reports included were those dealing exclusively with human subjects, were published in the English language and had free, full-text, public access. Quality assessment was done using Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports. Data was extracted and the case reports were evaluated for demographic, diagnostic and treatment parameters. Results: Of the 515 studies initially identified, 5(0.97%) were analysed; all males with mean age 68.6 years (SD= 10.78). The most common symptom reported at presentation was low back pain 3(60%), Osteolytic lesions were seen in 4(80%) patients on imaging with elevated prostate surface antigen levels. Anaemia was found in 3(60%) patients and 2(40%) had thrombocytopenia. Conclusion: Multiple myeloma and prostate adenocarcinoma can coexist although it is rare. Awareness regarding the possible coexistence of the two prominent cancer types may further help clinicians during their practice in considering multiple myeloma as a differential diagnosis when encountered with patients having osteolytic bony lesions along with elevated levels of prostate-specific antigen

Impact of combined component separation technique and shoelace repair on big medline abdominal wall defect

Background: Closure of large anterior abdominal wall defects, regardless of their etiology, is challenging. There is no standardized information describing definitive management. Therefore, we conducted this study to illustrate our experience on large midline abdominal wall defect repair using an effective modified reconstructive technique. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Al Naqib Hospital in Aden/Yemen between 2012 and 2019. Twenty-six patients with large midline abdominal wall defects of various etiologies underwent surgical repair using a combination of shoelace repair and the component separation technique. The procedure involved bilateral longitudinal division of the anterior rectus sheet and creation of a posterior layer by approximation of the medial edges of the divided rectus sheet (shoelace abdominoplasty) and anterior external oblique muscle aponeurosis separation (component separation technique) to approximate the lateral edges of the divided rectus sheet and move the rectus muscles toward the midline for constructing the anterior abdominal wall layer. The posterior and anterior layers and bilateral separated sheets were covered with a polypropylene mesh in all patients, except in those who underwent emergency damage control surgery. Results: Four, one, and two patients developed seroma, skin necrosis and chronic pain, and post-surgical wound infection, respectively. No recurrent herniation was recorded during the median follow-up of 5 years. Conclusion: This technique is effective in restoring the integrity of the abdominal wall in large midline abdominal wall defects and has an acceptable aesthetic appearance. In our study, minimal complications were reported, and no cases of recurrent hernias were diagnosed during follow-up

Awake prone positioning for non-intubated COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Introduction: Awake prone positioning (APP) has been widely applied in non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. However, the results from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are inconsistent. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of APP and to identify the subpopulations that may benefit the most from it. Methods: We searched five electronic databases from inception to August 2022 (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022342426). We included only RCTs comparing APP with supine positioning or standard of care with no prone positioning. Our primary outcomes were the risk of intubation and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included the need for escalating respiratory support, length of ICU and hospital stay, ventilation-free days, and adverse events. Results: We included 11 RCTs and showed that APP reduced the risk of requiring intubation in the overall population (RR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74–0.95; moderate certainty). Following the subgroup analyses, a greater benefit was observed in two patient cohorts: those receiving a higher level of respiratory support (compared with those receiving conventional oxygen therapy) and those in intensive care unit (ICU) settings (compared to patients in non-ICU settings). APP did not decrease the risk of mortality (RR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.77–1.11; moderate certainty) and did not increase the risk of adverse events. Conclusions: In patients with COVID-19-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, APP likely reduced the risk of requiring intubation, but failed to demonstrate a reduction in overall mortality risk. The benefits of APP are most noticeable in those requiring a higher level of respiratory support in an ICU environment

It's not always Occam's razor: the pivotal role of telemedicine in stroke patients amidst the COVID-19 pandemic

The cost of healthcare in the US grew exponentially between the years 1970 and 2016, with a documented increase of 0.243% per year on average [1]. In 2007, at the inception of the era of crippling economic, the economy witnessed a 17.7% cost increase by 2019 [2]. Contributing to this upward trend of healthcare expenditure was the advent of telemedicine. On one hand, these disruptive technologies have positively correlated with healthcare expenditure. Contrary to this, however, it is important to factor the proportion of people that may not be able to afford healthcare overall as a consequence of increased inflation [1]. These figures arose significantly since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has overwhelmed and crippled healthcare systems globally. Nevertheless, it is in the midst of the pandemic that remote measures such as telemedicine are most needed. <br