88 research outputs found

    On chordal phylogeny graphs

    Full text link
    An acyclic digraph each vertex of which has indegree at most ii and outdegree at most jj is called an (i,j)(i, j) digraph for some positive integers ii and jj. Lee {\it et al.} (2017) studied the phylogeny graphs of (2,2)(2, 2) digraphs and gave sufficient conditions and necessary conditions for (2,2)(2, 2) digraphs having chordal phylogeny graphs. Their work was motivated by problems related to evidence propagation in a Bayesian network for which it is useful to know which acyclic digraphs have their moral graphs being chordal (phylogeny graphs are called moral graphs in Bayesian network theory). In this paper, we extend their work. We completely characterize phylogeny graphs of (1,i)(1, i) digraphs and (i,1)(i,1) digraphs, respectively, for a positive integer ii. Then, we study phylogeny graphs of a (2,j)(2,j) digraphs, which is worthwhile in the context that a child has two biological parents in most species, to show that the phylogeny graph of a (2,j)(2,j) digraph DD is chordal if the underlying graph of DD is chordal for any positive integer jj. Especially, we show that as long as the underlying graph of a (2,2)(2,2) digraph is chordal, its phylogeny graph is not only chordal but also planar.Comment: 18 page

    On weak majority dimensions of digraphs

    Full text link
    In this paper, we introduce the notion of the weak majority dimension of a digraph which is well-defined for any digraph. We first study properties shared by the weak dimension of a digraph and show that a weak majority dimension of a digraph can be arbitrarily large. Then we present a complete characterization of digraphs of weak majority dimension 00 and 11, respectively, and show that every digraph with weak majority dimension at most two is transitive. Finally, we compute the weak majority dimensions of directed paths and directed cycles and pose open problems

    The phylogeny number in the aspect of triangles and diamonds of a graph

    Full text link
    Given an acyclic digraph DD, the competition graph of DD, denoted by C(D)C(D), is the simple graph having vertex set V(D)V(D) and edge set {uv∣(u,w),(v,w)∈A(D)Β forΒ someΒ w∈V(D)}\{uv \mid (u, w), (v, w) \in A(D) \text{ for some } w \in V(D) \}. The phylogeny graph of an acyclic digraph DD, denoted by P(D)P(D), is the graph with the vertex set V(D)V(D) and the edge set E(U(D))βˆͺE(C(D))E(U(D)) \cup E(C(D)) where U(D)U(D) denotes the underlying graph of DD. The notion of phylogeny graphs was introduced by Roberts and Sheng~\cite{roberts1997phylogeny} as a variant of competition graph. Moral graphs having arisen from studying Bayesian networks are the same as phylogeny graphs. In this paper, we integrate the existing theorems computing phylogeny numbers of connected graph with a small number of triangles into one proposition: for a graph GG containing at most two triangle, ∣E(G)βˆ£βˆ’βˆ£V(G)βˆ£βˆ’2t(G)+d(G)+1≀p(G)β‰€βˆ£E(G)βˆ£βˆ’βˆ£V(G)βˆ£βˆ’t(G)+1 |E(G)|-|V(G)|-2t(G)+d(G)+1 \le p(G) \le |E(G)|-|V(G)|-t(G)+1 where t(G)t(G) and d(G)d(G) denote the number of triangles and the number of diamond in GG, respectively. Then we show that these inequalities hold for graphs with many triangles. In the process of showing it, we derive a useful theorem which plays a key role in deducing various meaningful results including a theorem that answers a question given by Wu~{\it et al.}~\cite{Wu2019}

    A new minimal chordal completion

    Full text link
    In this paper, we present a minimal chordal completion Gβˆ—G^* of a graph GG satisfying the inequality Ο‰(Gβˆ—)βˆ’Ο‰(G)≀i(G)\omega(G^*) - \omega(G) \le i(G) for the non-chordality index i(G)i(G) of GG. In terms of our chordal completions, we partially settle the Hadwiger conjecture and the Erd\H{o}s-Faber-Lov\'{a}sz Conjecture, and extend the known Ο‡\chi-bounded class by adding to it the family of graphs with bounded non-chordality indices

    Competition numbers of planar graphs

    Full text link
    In this paper, we relate the competition number of a graph to its edge clique cover number by presenting a tight inequality k(G)β‰₯ΞΈe(G)βˆ’βˆ£V(G)∣+k~(G)k(G) \ge \theta_e(G)-|V(G)|+\widetilde{k}(G) where ΞΈe(G)\theta_e(G), k(G)k(G), and k~(G)\widetilde{k}(G) are the edge clique cover number, the competition number, and the co-competition number of a graph GG, respectively. By utilizing this inequality and a notion of competition-effective edge clique cover, we obtain some meaningful results on competition numbers of planar graphs.Comment: 15 pages, 3 figure

    On the safe set of Cartesian product of two complete graphs

    Full text link
    For a connected graph GG, a vertex subset SS of V(G)V(G) is a safe set if for every component CC of the subgraph of GG induced by SS, ∣C∣β‰₯∣D∣|C| \ge |D| holds for every component DD of Gβˆ’SG-S such that there exists an edge between CC and DD, and, in particular, if the subgraph induced by SS is connected, then SS is called a connected safe set. For a connected graph GG, the safe number and the connected safe number of GG are the minimum among sizes of the safe sets and the minimum among sizes of the connected safe sets, respectively, of GG. Fujita et al. introduced these notions in connection with a variation of the facility location problem. In this paper, we study the safe number and the connected safe number of Cartesian product of two complete graphs. Figuring out a way to reduce the number of components to two without changing the size of safe set makes it sufficient to consider only partitions of an integer into two parts without which it would be much more complicated to take care of all the partitions. In this way, we could show that the safe number and the connected safe number of Cartesian product of two complete graphs are equal and present a polynomial-time algorithm to compute them. Especially, in the case where one of complete components has order at most four, we precisely formulate those numbers.Comment: 15 pages, 8 figure

    On mm-step competition graphs of bipartite tournaments

    Full text link
    In this paper, we completely characterize the mm-step competition graph of a bipartite tournament for any integer mβ‰₯2m \ge 2. In addition, we compute the competition index and the competition period of a bipartite tournament

    Holes and a chordal cut in a graph

    Full text link
    A set XX of vertices of a graph GG is called a {\em clique cut} of GG if the subgraph of GG induced by XX is a complete graph and the number of connected components of Gβˆ’XG-X is greater than that of GG. A clique cut XX of GG is called a {\em chordal cut} of GG if there exists a union UU of connected components of Gβˆ’XG-X such that G[UβˆͺX]G[U \cup X] is a chordal graph. In this paper, we consider the following problem: Given a graph GG, does the graph have a chordal cut? We show that K2,2,2K_{2,2,2}-free hole-edge-disjoint graphs have chordal cuts if they satisfy a certain condition.Comment: 12 pages, 1 figur

    The competition number of a graph in which any two holes share at most one edge

    Full text link
    The competition graph of a digraph D is a (simple undirected) graph which has the same vertex set as D and has an edge between x and y if and only if there exists a vertex v in D such that (x,v) and (y,v) are arcs of D. For any graph G, G together with sufficiently many isolated vertices is the competition graph of some acyclic digraph. The competition number k(G) of G is the smallest number of such isolated vertices. In general, it is hard to compute the competition number k(G) for a graph G and it has been one of important research problems in the study of competition graphs to characterize a graph by its competition number. A hole of a graph is a cycle of length at least 4 as an induced subgraph. It holds that the competition number of a graph cannot exceed one plus the number of its holes if G satisfies a certain condition. In this paper, we show that the competition number of a graph with exactly h holes any two of which share at most one edge is at most h+1, which generalizes the existing results on this subject.Comment: 29 pages, 14 figures, 1 tabl

    On consecutive edge magic total labeling of connected bipartite graphs

    Full text link
    Since Sedl\'{a}\breve{\mbox{c}}ek introduced the notion of magic labeling of a graph in 1963, a variety of magic labelings of a graph have been defined and studied. In this paper, we study consecutive edge magic labelings of a connected bipartite graph. We make a very useful observation that there are only four possible values of bb for which a connected bipartite graph has a bb-edge consecutive magic labeling. On the basis of this fundamental result, we deduce various interesting results on consecutive edge magic labelings of bipartite graphs, especially caterpillars and lobsters, which extends the results given by Sugeng and Miller.Comment: 14 pages, 2 figure
    • …
    corecore