42,085 research outputs found

    Divergent selection on feather pecking behaviour in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus)

    Get PDF
    A selection experiment was initiated in 1996 in which selection for (HP line) and against (LP line) feather pecking was performed. The foundation stock was a White Leghorn layer strain established in 1970 and maintained since then as a random bred control line at the Institute. Six hatches were produced over three generations. At the age of 68 wk (gen. 0, 1996), 35 wk (gen. 1, 1997), 30 wk (gen. 2, 1998), and 27 wk (gen. 3, 1999) female birds were transferred to observation pens and their feather pecking behaviour was recorded. In each generation, 30 females and 8 males were selected from approx. 200 females and 60 males. Selection criteria was breeding value estimated by animal model on the trait ‘number of bouts of feather pecking per bird per hour’. Feather pecking behaviour in adult hens was significantly higher in HP than in LP. In generation 2 the following was recorded: Bouts per bird per hour (3.10 versus 1.37, P<0.01), pecks per bird per hour (7.04 versus 3.58, P<0.05) and proportion of hens recorded feather pecking in the 180 minutes observation period (67 versus 56%, P<0.05). In generation 3 the following was recorded: Bouts per bird per hour (4.56 versus 0.63, P<0.001), pecks per bird per hour (13.9 versus 2.51, P<0.001) and proportion of hens recorded feather pecking in the 180 minutes observation period (75 versus 49%, P<0.001). In generation 3, plumage condition was better in LP on neck, breast, back, wings and tail, as well as overall (P<0.001). Body weight did not differ between lines in generation 2, but in generation 3, HP hens were on average heavier than LP hens at the age of 27 weeks (1435 g versus 1371 g, P<0.001)

    VARIANCE COMPONENTS AND SELECTION FOR FEATHER PECKING BEHAVIOR IN LAYING HENS

    Get PDF
    Variance components and selection response for feather pecking behaviour were studied by analysing the data from a divergent selection experiment. An investigation show that a Box-Cox transformation with power =-0.2 made the data be approximately normally distributed and fit best by the given model. Variance components and selection response were estimated using Bayesian analysis with Gibbs sampling technique. The total variation was rather large for the two traits in both low feather pecking line (LP) and high feather pecking line (HP). The standard deviation was about three times as large as the mean in the observed scale, and about the same value as the mean in the transformed scale. Based on the mean of marginal posterior distribution, in the Box-Cox transformed scale, heritability for number of feather pecking bouts (FP bouts) was 0.174 in line LP and 0.139 in line HP. For number of feather pecking pecks (FP pecks), heritability was 0.139 in line LP and 0.105 in line HP. No full-sib group effect and observing pen effect were found in the two traits. After 4 generations of selection, the total response for number of FP bouts in the transformed scale was 58% and 74% of the mean of the first generation in line LP and line HP, respectively. And the total response for number of FP pecks was 47% and 46% of the mean of the first generation in line LP and line HP, respectively. The total response in original scale in line HP was rather larger than that in line LP. These results show that the heritability for feather pecking behaviour is moderately low but the variation is large. And genetic improvement on feather pecking behaviour by selection is effective
    corecore