Carotid artery stenting outcomes in high-risk patients receiving best medical therapy : Results from a single high-volume interventional cardiology practice

Publisher Copyright: © 2016Background Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is now being widely used in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated low adverse event rates after CAS. This study evaluates the 30-day and 1-year results in patients treated with CAS and receiving intensive medical therapy in a high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention center. Methods A total of 184 patients underwent CAS between January 2011 and December 2013. In addition to antiplatelet therapy, patients received intensive antihypertensive treatment, high intensity statin and heart rate normalization therapy. Patients were stratified according to age and symptomatic status. Results Most of the patients (86.4%) had at least one high surgical risk criteria. The procedural success rate was 98.4%. The 30-day and 1-year incidence of stroke were 4.1% and 4.5%, respectively. At 30 days the combined rate of stroke/cardiovascular (CV) death/myocardial infarction (MI) was 5.8% and 10.9% in 1 year. The 30-day incidence of stroke/CV death in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients was 5.4% and 4.2%, respectively. Age ≥80 years increased the risk of stroke/CV death/MI at 1 year (OR 4.41; 95% CI 1.06–18.36; P = 0.04). Conclusions The study demonstrated acceptable clinical outcome results in patients with high medical comorbidities treated with CAS and intensive medical therapy. Adverse event rate in symptomatic patients did not exceed the guideline recommended range while in asymptomatic patients it was increased.publishersversionPeer reviewe

CT or Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain.

Background: In the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), computed tomography (CT) is an accurate, noninvasive alternative to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, the comparative effectiveness of CT and ICA in the management of CAD to reduce the frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events is uncertain. Methods: We conducted a pragmatic, randomized trial comparing CT with ICA as initial diagnostic imaging strategies for guiding the treatment of patients with stable chest pain who had an intermediate pretest probability of obstructive CAD and were referred for ICA at one of 26 European centers. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) over 3.5 years. Key secondary outcomes were procedure-related complications and angina pectoris. Results: Among 3561 patients (56.2% of whom were women), follow-up was complete for 3523 (98.9%). Major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 38 of 1808 patients (2.1%) in the CT group and in 52 of 1753 (3.0%) in the ICA group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 1.07; P = 0.10). Major procedure-related complications occurred in 9 patients (0.5%) in the CT group and in 33 (1.9%) in the ICA group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.55). Angina during the final 4 weeks of follow-up was reported in 8.8% of the patients in the CT group and in 7.5% of those in the ICA group (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.48). Conclusions: Among patients referred for ICA because of stable chest pain and intermediate pretest probability of CAD, the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was similar in the CT group and the ICA group. The frequency of major procedure-related complications was lower with an initial CT strategy. (Funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Program and others; DISCHARGE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02400229.)