Increasing incidence and decreasing mortality of colorectal cancer due to marked cohort effects in southern Netherlands

In preparation for any type of forthcoming colorectal cancer (CRC) mass screening we examined trends in CRC incidence and mortality according to sex, subsite and age in southern Netherlands. Population-based data from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry during the period 1975-2004 were used. Age-period-cohort analyses were performed to investigate possible aetiologic, diagnostic or therapeutic origins of the trends. Age-adjusted (European Standardized Rates) incidence rates for colon cancer increased since 1975 from 23 in 100 000 for both sexes to about 38 in 100 000 for males and 30 in 100 000 for females in 2004. Incidence of rectal cancer remained relatively stable at about 25 in 100 000 males and 15 in 100 000 females. The incidence of CRC increased for male patients from birth cohorts between 1900 and 1955 (P = 0.010), especially in left-sided colon cancer in the younger birth cohorts [RR1900: 0.8 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.6, 1.0), RR1960: 1.6 (95% CI: 0.9, 2.8), reference: 1910-1919]. For women a similar, although weaker increase in CRC incidence was found. Mortality rates for CRC started to decrease in 1975, more pronounced for rectal than for colon cancer. The relative risk for dying in men with CRC decreased from 1.3 (95% CI: 1.0, 1.6) in the 1900 birth cohort to 0.1 (95% CI: 0.1, 0.4) in the 1960 birth cohort, reference 1910-1919 birth cohort. The increasing incidence and decreasing mortality in CRC is largely affected by birth cohort effects. Changes in CRC incidence are likely to be attributed to lifestyle factors and decreasing mortality is due to earlier detection and improved treatment, especially among younger patients. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 18:145-152 (C) 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Improvable quality of diagnostic assessment of colorectal cancer in southern Netherlands

Objective To determine the extent of guideline implementation of the diagnostic approach in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) in southern Netherlands in 2005, with special focus on colonoscopy. Methods Data were extracted from the medical records for a random sample of 257 colon and 251 rectal cancer patients newly diagnosed in 2005 and recorded from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry. Adherence to guidelines was determined for diagnostic assessment. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess determinants of complete colonoscopy. Results Diagnostic assessment was carried out mainly by internists (50%) and gastroenterologists (36%). Colonoscopy was performed in 83% of patients with proximal/transverse colon cancer, 55% of those with distal colon cancer, and 65% of those with rectal cancer. A tumour biopsy was taken for 84% of colon and 93% of rectal tumours. Colonoscopy completeness was lower for patients with comorbidity, obstructing tumours, and patients with poor bowel preparation. Abdominal ultrasound was performed for 72% of colon and 52% of rectal cancer patients and a thoracic radiography of over 80% of CRC patients. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen was performed in over half of the colon cancer patients and a pelvic CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging in 36% of rectal cancer patients. Conclusion Improvements in adherence to diagnostic guidelines for CRC appear possible, especially in the performance of imaging procedures. Among patients where complete visualization of the colon was not feasible with colonoscopy, imaging techniques such as virtual CT might be of added value in the near future. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21:570-575 (c) 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Long-Term Outcome of Immediate Versus Postponed Intervention in Patients With Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis (POINTER):Multicenter Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term outcomes of immediate drainage versus the postponed drainage approach in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In the randomized POINTER trial, patients assigned to the postponed-drainage approach using antibiotic treatment required fewer interventions, as compared to immediate drainage, and over a third were treated without any intervention. METHODS: Clinical data of those patients alive after the initial 6-month follow-up were re-evaluated. Primary outcome was a composite of death and major complications. RESULTS: Out of 104 patients, 88 were re-evaluated with a median follow-up of 51 months. After the initial 6-month follow-up, the primary outcome occurred in 7 of 47 patients (15%) in the immediate-drainage group and 7 of 41 patients (17%) in the postponed-drainage group (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.33-2.28; P =0.78). Additional drainage procedures were performed in 7 patients (15%) versus 3 patients (7%) (RR 2.03; 95% CI 0.56-7.37; P =0.34). The median number of additional interventions was 0 (IQR 0-0) in both groups ( P =0.028). In the total follow-up, the median number of interventions was higher in the immediate-drainage group than in the postponed-drainage group (4 vs. 1, P =0.001). Eventually, 14 of 15 patients (93%) in the postponed-drainage group who were successfully treated in the initial 6-month follow-up with antibiotics and without any intervention, remained without intervention. At the end of follow-up, pancreatic function and quality of life were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Also during long-term follow-up, a postponed drainage approach using antibiotics in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis results in fewer interventions as compared to immediate drainage, and should therefore be the preferred approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN33682933