The antinomies of political evidence in post-apartheid Durban, South Africa

Post-Apartheid South Africa has witnessed an outpouring of testimony to past and present inequities, using varied means and to varied effect. This paper addresses challenges faced by people engaged in social justice work as they devise evidence specifically for political ends. Political evidence poses several challenges to people consciously engaged in transforming their social conditions. I ask how various forms of political evidence and testimony to post-Apartheid racism are produced in the neighbourhood of Wentworth, Durban – a mixed industrial-residential landscape saturated with petrochemical pollution. People engaged in political work in Wentworth struggle to demonstrate evidence of environmental racism against official dissimulation. Wentworth's residents often face the limits of legal-juridical notions of evidence exemplified in compensatory disputes. I explore how evidence is mobilized in political work through specific tools and authorizing discourses that privilege compensation alongside other forms of activist witnessing of social inequality. Certain kinds of evidence are deemed more legitimate as political evidence, whether or not these kinds can help transform persisting inequalities after Apartheid. While official dissimulation points to the limits of narrowing the focus to compensation, official silencing also highlights emergent forms of witness to legal, racialized social inequality. Wentworth speaks to innovations in political evidence in the wake of a racially fragmented archive, and in relation to new forms of state-sanctioned racism

The politics of life: governing childhood

This article uses Foucault's analysis of bio-politics to explore continuities between child-saving and child rights and the connection of both to the racial governing of childhood. It shows how the birth of the modern idea of childhood coincided with shifts in governance from sovereignty to bio-politics, or a politics of life. This shift was the ground on which new practices of philanthropic concern acted on the child to produce new ideas about the child's special capacities and vulnerabilities. These novel practices of governance generated new forms of resistance and new sites of struggle. One strand of these new forms of resistance was the assertion of rights to health, welfare and life. It is in the context of struggles over these new kinds of rights, rather than an older conception of political rights, that the shift to the figure of the rights-bearing child should be understood. The shift from sovereignty to bio-politics was also central to the production of sex/sexuality and race as the truth of the modern subject, and the child appeared as a key figure in these new discursive constructions

Interpersonal conflict over water is associated with household demographics, domains of water insecurity, and regional conflict: Evidence from nine sites across eight sub-saharan african countries

Water insecurity may precipitate interpersonal conflict, although no studies to date have rigorously examined these relationships. We examined relationships between household demograph-ics, water insecurity, regional conflict, and interpersonal conflict over water. Using survey data from eight sub-Saharan African countries, we found that interpersonal conflict within and outside the home is associated with multiple domains of water insecurity, particularly accessibility. Further-more, we found that higher levels of remote violence and protests are associated with greater within household conflict, whereas riots and violent armed conflict are associated with greater conflict between neighbors. Our findings expand upon the current literature by examining factors affecting interpersonal conflict over water, which may become increasingly important as precipitation patterns and land temperatures change in this region. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.Open access journalThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]