Low rate of cardiac events in first-degree relatives of diagnosis-negative young sudden unexplained death syndrome victims during follow-up

BACKGROUND: Sudden unexplained death syndrome (SUDS) in young individuals often results from inherited cardiac disease. Accordingly, comprehensive examination in surviving first-degree relatives unmasks such disease in approximately 35% of the families. It is unknown whether individuals from diagnosis-negative families are at risk of developing manifest disease or cardiac events during follow-up.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to study the prognosis of first-degree relatives of young SUDS victims, in whom the initial cardiologic and genetic examination did not lead to a diagnosis.METHODS: We retrieved vital status of surviving first-degree relatives from 83 diagnosis-negative families who presented to our cardiogenetics department between 1996 and 2009 because of SUDS in ≥1 relatives aged 1-50 years. Moreover, we contacted relatives who previously visited our center for detailed information.RESULTS: We obtained detailed information (median follow-up 6.6 years; interquartile range 4.7-9.6 years) in 340 of 417 first-degree relatives (81.5%) from 77 of 83 families (92.8%). Vital status, available in 405 relatives (97.1%), showed that 20 relatives (4.9%) died during follow-up, including 1 natural death before the age of 50. This girl belonged to a family with multiple cases of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and SUDS, including another successfully resuscitated sibling during follow-up. Two hundred thirty-four of 340 first-degree relatives (68.8%) underwent cardiologic examination. Of these, 76 (32.5%) were reevaluated. Inherited cardiac disease was diagnosed in 3 families (3.6%).CONCLUSION: In first-degree relatives of young SUDS victims with no manifest abnormalities during the initial examination, the risk of developing manifest inherited cardiac disease or cardiac events during follow-up is low. This does not apply to families with obvious familial SUDS.</p

Metabolic effects of PCSK9 inhibition with Evolocumab in subjects with elevated Lp(a)

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies substantiated that subjects with elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] have a markedly increased cardiovascular risk. Inhibition of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) lowers both LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) as well as Lp(a), albeit modestly. Effects of PCSK9 inhibition on circulating metabolites such as lipoprotein subclasses, amino acids and fatty acids remain to be characterized. METHODS: We performed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolomics on plasma samples derived from 30 individuals with elevated Lp(a) (> 150 mg/dL). The 30 participants were randomly assigned into two groups, placebo (N = 14) and evolocumab (N = 16). We assessed the effect of 16 weeks of evolocumab 420 mg Q4W treatment on circulating metabolites by running lognormal regression analyses, and compared this to placebo. Subsequently, we assessed the interrelationship between Lp(a) and 14 lipoprotein subclasses in response to treatment with evolocumab, by running multilevel multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: On average, evolocumab treatment for 16 weeks resulted in a 17% (95% credible interval: 8 to 26%, P < 0.001) reduction of circulating Lp(a), coupled with substantial reduction of VLDL, IDL and LDL particles as well as their lipid contents. Interestingly, increasing concentrations of baseline Lp(a) were associated with larger reduction in triglyceride-rich VLDL particles after evolocumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of PCSK9 with evolocumab markedly reduced VLDL particle concentrations in addition to lowering LDL-C. The extent of reduction in VLDL particles depended on the baseline level of Lp(a). Our findings suggest a marked effect of evolocumab on VLDL metabolism in subjects with elevated Lp(a). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registration information is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on April 14, 2016 with the registration number NCT02729025

The maturation of a "neural-hematopoietic' inflammatory axis in cardiovascular disease

Purpose of reviewAtherogenesis is the result of a complex interplay between lipids and innate immune cells, which are descendants of upstream progenitors residing in hematopoietic organs. In this review, we will discuss recent advances in the connection between hematopoiesis and atherogenesis.Recent findingsThe relevance of a neural-hematopoietic axis was recently supported by the demonstration of a correlation between metabolic activity in the amygdala and the bone marrow. During follow-up, both amygdalar and bone marrow activities also predicted cardiovascular risk in patients, lending further support to a connection between neural stress and cardiovascular events mediated via increased hematopoietic activity.In parallel, functional changes in hematopoietic stem cells may also convey cardiovascular risk. In experimental models, knock-out of the ten-eleven translocation 2 (TET2) gene leading to monocyte-macrophage hyperresponsiveness, was associated with accelerated atherogenesis in murine experiments. In humans, whole-exome sequencing reporting on the clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential' gene substantiated a two-fold elevated risk for developing coronary heart disease compared with noncarriers.SummaryRecent studies support the relevance of a neural-hematopoietic' inflammatory axis and clonal hematopoiesis as drivers of atherogenesis in humans. These data warrant further studies addressing the role of novel hematopoietic' targets for the treatment of patients with increased cardiovascular ris

Persistent arterial wall inflammation in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) despite strong low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction by proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibody treatment

AIMS: Subjects with lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] elevation have increased arterial wall inflammation and cardiovascular risk. In patients at increased cardiovascular risk, arterial wall inflammation is reduced following lipid-lowering therapy by statin treatment or lipoprotein apheresis. However, it is unknown whether lipid-lowering treatment in elevated Lp(a) subjects alters arterial wall inflammation. We evaluated whether evolocumab, which lowers both low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and Lp(a), attenuates arterial wall inflammation in patients with elevated Lp(a). METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 129 patients {median [interquartile range (IQR)]: age 60.0 [54.0-67.0] years, Lp(a) 200.0 [155.5-301.5] nmol/L [80.0 (62.5-121.0) mg/dL]; mean [standard deviation (SD)] LDL-C 3.7 [1.0] mmol/L [144.0 (39.7) mg/dL]; National Cholesterol Education Program high risk, 25.6%} were randomized to monthly subcutaneous evolocumab 420 mg or placebo. Compared with placebo, evolocumab reduced LDL-C by 60.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 65.8-55.5] and Lp(a) by 13.9% (95% CI 19.3-8.5). Among evolocumab-treated patients, the Week 16 mean (SD) LDL-C level was 1.6 (0.7) mmol/L [60.1 (28.1) mg/dL], and the median (IQR) Lp(a) level was 188.0 (140.0-268.0) nmol/L [75.2 (56.0-107.2) mg/dL]. Arterial wall inflammation [most diseased segment target-to-background ratio (MDS TBR)] in the index vessel (left carotid, right carotid, or thoracic aorta) was assessed by 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography. Week 16 index vessel MDS TBR was not significantly altered with evolocumab (-8.3%) vs. placebo (-5.3%) [treatment difference -3.0% (95% CI -7.4% to 1.4%); P = 0.18]. CONCLUSION: Evolocumab treatment in patients with median baseline Lp(a) 200.0 nmol/L led to a large reduction in LDL-C and a small reduction in Lp(a), resulting in persistent elevated Lp(a) levels. The latter may have contributed to the unaltered arterial wall inflammation

Are individuals within families with premature truly sudden unexplained death at risk during long-term follow-up?

Introduction: After young sudden unexplained death (SUD), comprehensive cardiologic and genetic examination in surviving first-degree relatives unmasks inherited cardiac disease in ∼40% of families, enabling timely prophylactic treatment. It is unknown, however, whether individuals from diagnosis-negative families (in which such investigations revealed no inherited cardiac disease) are at risk of developing manifest disease or cardiac events during follow-up. Methods: We obtained vital status of surviving first-degree relatives from all 86 families who presented to our cardiogenetics department in 1996-2009 because of SUD of >1 relative aged 1-50 years, in whom no diagnosis was made. Moreover, we contacted relatives who previously attended our center for detailed information on themselves and their relatives. Results: We obtained detailed follow-up (median duration of 5.6 years [range: 1.8-11.5]) in 492 first-degree relatives from 75 diagnosis-negative families (87.2%). Vital status, checked in all relatives, showed that 6 (1.2%) died during follow-up. One relative committed suicide, while in 3 relatives over the age of 50 years information on the cause of death was unavailable. One young woman died from a one-sided car accident without clear cause. None of these relatives had been evaluated in our center. One 10year-old girl died suddenlywhile watching television. She belonged to a family with multiple previous cases of (aborted) SUD, in which 2 other children were successfully resuscitated during follow-up. Inherited cardiac disease was diagnosed in 2 families (2.3%): Brugada syndrome in a man who underwent his first cardiologic examination during follow-up, and familial thoracic aortic aneurysms/dissections due to a TGFBR1 mutation in a man who had a slightly dilated aorta during initial cardiologic examination. Conclusions: In first-degree relatives of young SUD victims with no manifest abnormalities during initial cardiologic examination, the risk of developing manifest inherited cardiac disease or cardiac events during follow-up is low. This does not applyto families with a clear idiopathic inherited arrhythmia syndrome

Short-term regulation of hematopoiesis by lipoprotein(a) results in the production of pro-inflammatory monocytes

Background: Lipoproteins are important regulators of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) biology, predominantly affecting myelopoiesis. Since myeloid cells, including monocytes and macrophages, promote the inflammatory response that propagates atherosclerosis, it is of interest whether the atherogenic low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] contributes to atherogenesis via stimulating myelopoiesis. Methods & results: To assess the effects of Lp(a)-priming on long-term HSPC behavior we transplanted BM of Lp(a) transgenic mice, that had been exposed to elevated levels of Lp(a), into lethally-irradiated C57Bl6 mice and hematopoietic reconstitution was analyzed. No differences in HSPC populations or circulating myeloid cells were detected ten weeks after transplantation. Likewise, in vitro stimulation of C57Bl6 BM cells for 24 h with Lp(a) did not affect colony formation, total cell numbers or myeloid populations 7 days later. To assess the effects of elevated levels of Lp(a) on myelopoiesis, C57Bl6 bone marrow (BM) cells were stimulated with lp(a) for 24 h, and a marked increase in granulocyte-monocyte progenitors, pro-inflammatory Ly6high monocytes and macrophages was observed. Seven days of continuous exposure to Lp(a) increased colony formation and enhanced the formation of pro-inflammatory monocytes and macrophages. Antibody-mediated neutralization of oxidized phospholipids abolished the Lp(a)-induced effects on myelopoiesis. Conclusion: Lp(a) enhances the production of inflammatory monocytes at the bone marrow level but does not induce cell-intrinsic long-term priming of HSPCs. Given the short-term and direct nature of this effect, we postulate that Lp(a)-lowering treatment has the capacity to rapidly revert this multi-level inflammatory response

Increased haematopoietic activity in patients with atherosclerosis

Experimental work posits that acute ischaemic events trigger haematopoietic activity, driving monocytosis, and atherogenesis. Considering the chronic low-grade inflammatory state in atherosclerosis, we hypothesized that haematopoietic hyperactivity is a persistent feature in cardiovascular disease (CVD). Therefore, we aimed to assess the activity of haematopoietic organs and haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in humans. First, we performed 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic (18F-FDG PET) imaging in 26 patients with stable atherosclerotic CVD (ischaemic event >12 months ago), and 25 matched controls. In splenic tissue, 18F-FDG uptake was 2.68 ± 0.65 in CVD patients vs. 1.75 ± 0.54 in controls (1.6-fold higher; P <0.001), and in bone marrow 3.20 ± 0.76 vs. 2.72 ± 0.46 (1.2-fold higher; P = 0.003), closely related to LDL cholesterol levels (LDLc, r = 0.72). Subsequently, we determined progenitor potential of HSPCs harvested from 18 patients with known atherosclerotic CVD and 30 matched controls; both groups were selected from a cohort of cancer patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. In CVD patients, the normalized progenitor potential, expressed as the number of colony-forming units-granulocyte/monocyte (CFU-GM) colonies/CD34+ cell, was 1.6-fold higher compared with matched controls (P < 0.001). Finally, we assessed the effects of native and oxidized lipoproteins on HSPCs harvested from healthy donors in vitro. Haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells displayed a 1.5-fold increased CFU-GM capacity in co-culture with oxidized LDL in vitro (P = 0.002), which was inhibited by blocking oxidized phospholipids via E06 (P = 0.001). Collectively, these findings strengthen the case for a chronically affected haematopoietic system, potentially driving the low-grade inflammatory state in patients with atherosclerosi