Patterning the Cone Mosaic Array in Zebrafish Retina Requires Specification of Ultraviolet-Sensitive Cones

<div><p>Cone photoreceptors in teleost fish are organized in precise, crystalline arrays in the epithelial plane of the retina. In zebrafish, four distinct morphological/spectral cone types occupy specific, invariant positions within a regular lattice. The cone lattice is aligned orthogonal and parallel to circumference of the retinal hemisphere: it emerges as cones generated in a germinal zone at the retinal periphery are incorporated as single-cell columns into the cone lattice. Genetic disruption of the transcription factor Tbx2b eliminates most of the cone subtype maximally sensitive to ultraviolet (UV) wavelengths and also perturbs the long-range organization of the cone lattice. In the <i>tbx2b</i> mutant, the other three cone types (red, green, and blue cones) are specified in the correct proportion, differentiate normally, and acquire normal, planar polarized adhesive interactions mediated by Crumbs 2a and Crumbs 2b. Quantitative image analysis of cell adjacency revealed that the cones in the <i>tbx2b</i> mutant primarily have two nearest neighbors and align in single-cell-wide column fragments that are separated by rod photoreceptors. Some UV cones differentiate at the dorsal retinal margin in the <i>tbx2b</i> mutant, although they are severely dysmorphic and are eventually eliminated. Incorporating loss of UV cones during formation of cone columns at the margin into our previously published mathematical model of zebrafish cone mosaic formation (which uses bidirectional interactions between planar cell polarity proteins and anisotropic mechanical stresses in the plane of the retinal epithelium to generate regular columns of cones parallel to the margin) reproduces many features of the pattern disruptions seen in the <i>tbx2b</i> mutant.</p></div

The rod phenotype in <i>tbx2b</i> mutant embryos is partially compensated in adults.

<p>Rods and cones were counted in wild-type (wt) and <i>tbx2b</i> mutant (mut) embryos at 3 days post-fertilization (dpf) and in adult retinas and plotted as planimetric density (#/10³ µm²). Photoreceptor profiles were identified by ZO-1 immunostaining and the rod opsin transgenic reporter was used to distinguish rods. Means ± standard deviation are plotted for n = 11 samples from 3 retinas (wt embryo), n = 8 samples from 4 retinas (mut embryo), n = 12 samples from 3 retinas (wt and mutant adult). *** p<0.001; ** p<0.01.</p

UV cones in <i>tbx2b</i> mutants are dysmorphic.

<p>A) Retinal cryosection from a <i>sws1:EGFP</i> adult zebrafish; UV cones are magenta, red-green double cones are immunostained with the specific marker, zpr1 (yellow), and nuclei are stained with the fluorescent dye, Hoechst (grey). The central panel is an overlay of the epifluorescent channel (UV cones) and transmitted light (differential interference contrast). Nuclei of red-green double cones (arrows), and blue cones (not indicated), are radially elongated and displaced apical to the outer limiting membrane (dashed line), whereas nuclei of UV cones are triangular in shape (circles) and positioned basal to the outer limiting membrane. B, C) In <i>tbx2b; sws1:EGFP</i> mutants, the morphology of red-green double cones (zpr1, yellow) and their nuclear position (white arrows) is normal, whereas the nuclei of UV cones (circles) are displaced apically beyond the outer limiting membrane (dashed line). One UV cone (black arrow) is collapsed. D, E) 3D volume renderings of UV cones near the retinal margin in wild-type, <i>sws1:EGFP</i> fish. Like all photoreceptors UV cones have a single, bulbous axonal terminal (cone pedicle, arrow). D) Many UV cones in <i>tbx2b; sws1:EGFP</i> mutant adults have a bifurcated axon and two pedicles (arrows). Scale bar: 20 µm (A,B,C).</p

Infrequent three-fold coordination of mutant retina cone photoreceptors suggests strongly directional interaction.

<p>(See Methods section for details of image processing.) A) To identify rods, we superimposed on the ZO-1 label (white) the signal in the rod GFP reporter channel (green) from a single z-slice per cell chosen to coincide with the level of the OLM. B) Same retina as panel A. Adjacent cone photoreceptors in ventral-temporal retina of adult <i>tbx2b</i> mutant. Red lines join pairs of cones that are classified as adjacent at both low and high threshold (see Methods), while yellow lines indicate pairs that were identified as adjacent only with the less stringent threshold. (C) Histogram showing the fraction of cone photoreceptors with the specified number of identified neighbors in a sample of ventral-temporal retina. (See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0085325#pone-0085325-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a> for additional data.) D) Segmented image from the region outlined by the dashed box in panels A and B. Pixels between adjacent cells that were filled in by the morphological closing procedure are colored either red (high threshold) or blue (low threshold); at this magnification, 1 pixel corresponds to 0.1 µm. The two cells flanking each red region were classified as adjacent at the high threshold, but the blue region is too long (along the axis joining the centers of the two cells) and too narrow (along the orthogonal axis) to meet the adjacency criteria at the high threshold. The blue region meets the adjacency criteria at the low threshold. Stars indicate cone cells that are three-fold coordinated, <i>i.e.</i> have 3 adjacent cells. Scale bars are 20 µm for A and B, and 4 µm for D.</p

Rod photoreceptors develop rapidly and UV cones are missing in <i>tbx2b</i> mutants.

<p>A) Isolated, larval <i>rh1:EGFP</i> eye at 3 days post-fertilization (dpf) viewed from the scleral aspect. Rod photoreceptors are green and immunostaining for the apical junctional marker, Zonula Occludens-1 (ZO-1) is in white. Dorsal is up; the optic nerve appears as a small white ring ventral to the center. B) Mutant <i>tbx2b; rh1:EGFP</i> larval eye at 3 dpf viewed from the scleral side. Note increased number of rods, especially in the ventral retina. C, D) Higher magnifications of central retina in wild-type and mutant eyes, respectively. E) Isolated, larval <i>sws1:EGFP</i> eye and F) <i>tbx2b; sws1:EGFP</i> eye at 4 dpf, viewed from the scleral aspect. Cones expressing the UV opsin reporter are pseudocolored magenta. The lens, outlined with a dashed white line, shows background fluorescence in F, due to the longer exposure time required to capture immunofluorescence of the few scattered UV cones. Scale bars:  = 50 µm (A,B); 10 µm (C,D); 50 µm (E,F).</p

Variable number and distribution of UV cones in adult <i>tbx2b</i> mutants.

<p>A, B) Flat-mounted retinas from <i>sws1:EGFP</i> wild-type fish; the optic disc is indicated by an asterisk; dorsal is up. C–H) Six examples of <i>tbx2b; sws1:EGFP</i> mutant retinas. Residual UV cones are typically at or near the dorsal margin (curved white arrows) and immediately dorsal to the optic disc (arrowhead). Scale bar: 500 µm (A–H).</p

The mosaic pattern is not disrupted after selective ablation of UV cones in adult wild-type fish.

<p>Retinal flat-mounts from a double transgenic adult fish (UV and blue cone reporters) immunostained for ZO-1. Ventral is down; optic disc (*); boxed area in panels to the right. A) Control retina, UV cones; A′) blue cones; A″) ZO-1, UV and blue. B) Transgenic fish exposed to intense light, 3 days post-lesion (dpl), UV cones; B′) blue and UV cones; B″) boundary of ventral region in which no cones are ablated (lower right) and only UV cones but not blue cones are ablated (upper right). C) At 21 dpl, all cone types, including UV cones, were ablated and have regenerated within the central and temporal retina in the region enclosed by dashes; C′) blue cones have regenerated within the region enclosed by dashes; C″) in the boxed region where only UV cones were ablated they do not regenerate. D) At 50 dpl, UV cones (along with other cone types) have regenerated within the region enclosed by dashes; D′) blue cones have regenerated within the region enclosed by dashes; D″) rods continue to accumulate in the spaces previously occupied by UV cones in the region where they were selectively ablated and fail to regenerate. Scale bars: 500 µm (A, A′ through D, D′); 10 µm (A″ through D″).</p

Planar polarized distribution of Crumbs2a is retained at the level of cone inner segments in <i>tbx2b</i> mutants despite loss of pentameric organization of red, green, and blue cones.

<p>Panels A–C and E–G are confocal images of retinal flat-mounts immunostained for Crb2a (white) in a wild-type, transgenic (<i>trβ2:tdTomato</i>) fish (A–C) in which red cones express the tdTomato reporter (red), and a <i>tbx2b</i> mutant (E–G), which expressed the <i>sws1:EGFP</i> reporter, although no UV cones are present in the region imaged. Each panel is a projection of 3 to 12 optical sections selected from a complete, vertical z-stack of the Crb2a immunolabeling: panels A, E are at the level of the OLM; panels B, F are 2–4 µm apical to the OLM, at the level of the red, green, and blue cone inner segments; panels C, G are 6–7 µm apical to the OLM, at the level of the red and green inner segments. A) Selected UV and blue cones are identified with magenta and blue dots, respectively, based on their relative sizes and positions in the mosaic array at the OLM. B) At the level of inner segments, Crb2a is preferentially localized to interfaces between red/green double cones and between a blue cone and the two flanking red cones (arrows). The inner segments of UV cones (magenta dots) are short and do not extend this far apically. C) Only the longest cones (red/green double cones) extend to this level, and Crb2a remains polarized. E) Retinal flat-mount from a <i>tbx2b</i> mutant at the OLM. This mutant did not carry the <i>sws2:mCherry</i> transgene, so the blue cones cannot be distinguished from the red and green cones. F, G) Short, curved segments of Crb2a, which resemble red/green double cone interfaces in the wild-type extend to the most apical level (G), but other Crb2a segments (yellow arrows) are at the intermediate level (F) but not higher (G). These may represent blue cones. Panels D and H show tangential cryosections through the level of nuclei of red, green, and blue cones; nuclei are stained with Hoechst (grey); red and green cones are immunolabeled with the membrane-associated, specific antibody, zpr1 (red). Both the wild-type (D) and <i>tbx2b</i> mutant (H) fish carried the UV and blue cone transgenes, <i>sws1:EGFP</i> (magenta) and <i>sws2:mCherry</i> (blue), although this retinal region lacked UV cones in the mutant. A single pentameric unit is encircled by an oval (D) and white arrows point to the interface between red and green double cone pairs. Scale bars: 10 µm (A, B, C, E, F, G) and (D, H).</p

Most cones are 2-fold coordinated in adult <i>tbx2b</i> mutant retinas.

<p>Images of flat-mounted retinas from two mutant <i>tbx2b;rh1:EGFP</i> adults were processed as illustrated in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0085325#pone-0085325-g007" target="_blank">Figure 7</a>. Regions sampled included dorsal (D), nasal (N), temporal (T), ventral-nasal (VN), and ventral-temporal (T). The average % n-fold coordination with low and high parameter thresholds are given.</p

The regular cone mosaic lattice is disrupted in <i>tbx2b</i> mutants.

<p>A, C) Cone mosaic lattice in the dorsal retina (A) and ventral retina (C) visualized in retinal flat-mounts of adult, wild-type, double transgenic (UV and blue cone reporter) fish. Cell profiles are stained with anti-ZO-1 (white). Rows of UV cones (magenta) and blue cones (blue) alternate with red-green double cones. Smaller, rounded ZO-1 profiles represent rods and irregular profiles are Müller glial processes. The inset shows a cartoon of the cone pattern; rods are represented by black dots. Rarely, cones are missing from the lattice (indicated by blue star in A and magenta star in C). The yellow circle encloses a UV cone surrounded by rods. B) Retinal flat-mount near the dorsal retinal margin of a <i>tbx2b</i> mutant with the UV cone reporter. Immunolabeling with ZO-1 (white) reveals absence of a rectilinear order, independent of the presence of the unusually large UV cones (magenta). This fish did not carry the blue opsin reporter transgene. D) Retinal flat-mount from ventral retina in a <i>tbx2b</i> mutant double transgenic: blue cones (blue) and red-green double cones (white profiles); UV cones are absent from the ventral retina. The red box delimits a region used for cone cell counts. E) Retinal flat-mount from wild-type, rod reporter transgenic fish with rods (green) and cones (white profiles). F) Retinal flat-mount from <i>tbx2b</i> mutant adult with rod reporter. Scale bars: 20 µm (A,B,C,E,F) and 20 µm (D).</p