2 research outputs found

    Predictors of anesthesia ready time: Analysis and benchmark dataCentral MessagePerspective

    No full text
    Objective: Patients undergoing congenital cardiac surgery require induction of anesthesia. Our objective was to identify the median anesthesia ready time and the predictors of this time. Methods: By using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database, we identified patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass procedures from 2017 to 2021. Univariate and multivariable regression modeling to predict the anesthesia ready time was performed using mixed-effects linear regression. Results: After exclusion of outliers, 44,418 cases were analyzed. The median anesthesia ready time was 51 minutes (interquartile range, 38-66). On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of a longer anesthesia ready time included decreasing weight (0.3 min/10 kg, 95% CI, 0.1-0.6; P = .011), prematurity (1.5 minutes, 95% CI, 0.8-2.2; P < .001), and presence of chromosomal abnormality (3.4 minutes, 95% CI, 1.5-5.2; P < .001). An increase in the duration in anesthesia ready time was seen with increasing Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery mortality category with an additional 7.8 minutes (95% CI, 5.2-10.4; P < .001) for a Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery 5 procedure compared with Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery 1. Emergency versus elective case designation was associated with an anesthesia ready time reduction of 3.6 minutes (95% CI, 1.1-6.1; P = .005), and an afternoon case start was associated with an anesthesia ready time reduction of 4.2 minutes (95% CI, 2.8-5.6; P < .001). The presence of an anesthesia trainee increased the anesthesia ready time by 3.8 minutes (95% CI, 2.6-5.0; P < .001). The presence of an airway in situ decreased the anesthesia ready time by 3.6 minutes (95% CI, 1.6-5.5; P < .001), whereas an in situ arterial line decreased the anesthesia ready time by 7.4 minutes (95% CI, 4.6-10.2; P < .001). Placement of a central venous line increased the anesthesia ready time by 8.5 minutes (95% CI, 5.9-11.1; P < .001). Conclusions: The median anesthesia ready time was 51 minutes. For patients with characteristics associated with prolonged anesthesia ready time, consideration should be given to allocation of additional anesthesia staffing to improve efficiency

    The Yasui operation: A single institutional experience over 30 yearsCentral MessagePerspective

    No full text
    Objective: The Yasui operation was introduced in 1987 for patients with 2 adequate ventricles, a ventricular septal defect, and aortic atresia or interrupted aortic arch. Despite promising early outcomes, left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) remains a long-term concern. The purpose of this study is to report our institutional experience with the Yasui operation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing the Yasui operation between 1989 and 2021. Results are reported as median with interquartile range (IQR). Results: Twenty-five patients underwent a Yasui operation (19 primary), at 11 days (IQR, 7-218 days) of life and weight of 3 kg (IQR, 2.8-4.1 days). Fundamental diagnosis was ventricular septal defect/interrupted aortic arch in 11 patients and ventricular septal defect/aortic atresia in 14. Follow-up was 96% (24 out of 25) at 5 years (IQR, 1.4-14.7) with 92% survival. Freedom from LVOTO reoperation was 91% at late follow-up with 2 patients requiring baffle revision at 6 and 9 years. Latest echocardiogram showed 100% of patients had normal biventricular function and 87% (20 out of 23) less than mild LVOTO at 5 years (IQR, 2.3-14.9). Diagnosis, aortic valve morphology, and material used were not predictors of LVOTO. Freedom from right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduit reoperation was 48% at a median of 5 years (IQR, 1.4-14.7). Conduit type was not a predictor of reintervention. Conclusions: The Yasui operation can be performed with low morbidity and mortality in patients with 2 acceptable-size ventricles and aortic atresia or interrupted aortic arch with severe LVOTO. Despite some burden of reoperation, midterm reoperation for LVOTO is not common and ventricular function is preserved
    corecore