13 research outputs found

    <i>Francisella tularensis</i> Subtype A.II Genomic Plasticity in Comparison with Subtype A.I

    Full text link
    <div><p>Although <i>Francisella tularensis</i> is considered a monomorphic intracellular pathogen, molecular genotyping and virulence studies have demonstrated important differences within the <i>tularensis</i> subspecies (type A). To evaluate genetic variation within type A strains, sequencing and assembly of a new subtype A.II genome was achieved for comparison to other completed <i>F</i>. <i>tularensis</i> type A genomes. In contrast with the <i>F</i>. <i>tularensis</i> A.I strains (SCHU S4, FSC198, NE061598, and TI0902), substantial genomic variation was observed between the newly sequenced <i>F</i>. <i>tularensis</i> A.II strain (WY-00W4114) and the only other publically available A.II strain (WY96-3418). Genome differences between WY-00W4114 and WY96-3418 included three major chromosomal translocations, 1580 indels, and 286 nucleotide substitutions of which 159 were observed in predicted open reading frames and 127 were located in intergenic regions. The majority of WY-00W4114 nucleotide deletions occurred in intergenic regions, whereas most of the insertions and substitutions occurred in predicted genes. Of the nucleotide substitutions, 48 (30%) were synonymous and 111 (70%) were nonsynonymous. WY-00W4114 and WY96-3418 nucleotide polymorphisms were predominantly G/C to A/T allelic mutations, with WY-00W4114 having more A+T enrichment. In addition, the A.II genomes contained a considerably higher number of intact genes and longer repetitive sequences, including transposon remnants than the A.I genomes. Together these findings support the premise that <i>F</i>. <i>tularensis</i> A.II may have a fitness advantage compared to the A.I subtype due to the higher abundance of functional genes and repeated chromosomal sequences. A better understanding of the selective forces driving <i>F</i>. <i>tularensis</i> genetic diversity and plasticity is needed.</p></div

    Diagram depicting large rearrangements of locally collinear blocks (LCBs) within <i>F</i>. <i>tularensis</i> A.II strains.

    Full text link
    <p><i>F</i>. <i>tularensis</i> A.II strains WY-00W4114 and WY96-3418 chromosomal comparison showing related LCBs (A) and potential recombination events with a two-step parsimonious molecular process (B). Each LCB is represented with a different pattern and/or shading. Directionality of the LCBs is depicted with an arrow and is based on the reference strain WY96-3418 (GenBank accession number CP000608). Nucleotide positions are denoted in kilobase pairs by the corresponding genome.</p

    Genome rearrangement representation for NE061598 and Schu S4 genomes.

    Full text link
    <p>Each local collinear blocks (LCB) 1-6 is represented by a different color. Upside-down blocks (i.e. LCB2) represent the location of the reverse strand, which means an inversion has occurred. Note the rearrangements of LCB4 and LCB5.</p

    Genome rearrangement representation for NE061598, Schu S4 and FSC033 genomes.

    Full text link
    <p>Each local collinear blocks (LCB) 1–10 is represented by a different color. Upside-down blocks (i.e. LCBs 3 and 9) represent the location of the reverse strand, which means an inversion has occurred. Each LCB is denoted above NE061598.</p

    VNTR markers and their differences between Schu S4 and NE061598.

    Full text link
    a<p>FtM1-FtM25 VNTR markers as previously reported by Johansson et al. <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0009007#pone.0009007-Johansson1" target="_blank">[7]</a>. New VTNR polymorphisms identified in this study are listed as VNTR1 through VNTR-5.</p>b<p>Indicates repeat size in nucleotides.</p>c<p>“G” indicates that the repeat is located within an open reading frame (genic) whereas “I” indicates that the repeat is located within an intergenic region. Distance to predicted translation start site is indicated in nucleotides. “+” or “−” indicates that the translation start site is downstream or upstream of repeat motif, respectively (as reported by Johansson et al. <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0009007#pone.0009007-Johansson1" target="_blank">[7]</a>).</p

    Diagram illustrating GC skew within chromosomal topology map for <i>F</i>. <i>tularensis</i> A.I and A.II strains.

    Full text link
    <p>The circular <i>F</i>. <i>tularensis</i> chromosome of subtype A.I strains are represented by SCHU S4 (A) and NE061598 (B), and WY96-3418 (C) and WY-00W4114 (D) represent the subtype A.II strains. The origin (<i>ori</i>) and termination (<i>ter</i>) region are denoted by a vertical black line at the top and bottom, respectively, of the corresponding chromosomal map. GC skew + (gray) and GC skew—(black) is shown in the outermost circle for each genome and the kilobase pair position is indicated in the innermost circle.</p

    Depiction of genomic rearrangement between local collinear blocks 4 and 5 in NE061598 compared to Schu S4.

    Full text link
    <p>Direct repeats 1 (DRI) and II (DRII) are colored in green in both 3A (Schu S4) and 3B (NE061598). DRIII, a segment of both DRI and DRII, is colored in red. Note that DRIII is found independently in LCB4. The initial 207 bp of DRI and DRII in Schu S4 is colored in blue. Note that the genomic rearrangement resulted in the loss of this initial 207 bp region in DR1 of NE061598.</p
    corecore