34 research outputs found

    Carboplatin-induced gene expression changes in vitro are prognostic of survival in epithelial ovarian cancer

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>We performed a time-course microarray experiment to define the transcriptional response to carboplatin <it>in vitro</it>, and to correlate this with clinical outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). RNA was isolated from carboplatin and control-treated 36M2 ovarian cancer cells at several time points, followed by oligonucleotide microarray hybridization. Carboplatin induced changes in gene expression were assessed at the single gene as well as at the pathway level. Clinical validation was performed in publicly available microarray datasets using disease free and overall survival endpoints.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Time-course and pathway analyses identified 317 genes and 40 pathways (designated time-course and pathway signatures) deregulated following carboplatin exposure. Both types of signatures were validated in two separate platinum-treated ovarian and NSCLC cell lines using published microarray data. Expression of time-course and pathway signature genes distinguished between patients with unfavorable and favorable survival in two independent ovarian cancer datasets. Among the pathways most highly induced by carboplatin <it>in vitro</it>, the NRF2, NF-kB, and cytokine and inflammatory response pathways were also found to be upregulated prior to chemotherapy exposure in poor prognosis tumors.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Dynamic assessment of gene expression following carboplatin exposure <it>in vitro </it>can identify both genes and pathways that are correlated with clinical outcome. The functional relevance of this observation for better understanding the mechanisms of drug resistance in EOC will require further evaluation.</p

    Integrated Analysis of Multiple Microarray Datasets Identifies a Reproducible Survival Predictor in Ovarian Cancer

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Public data integration may help overcome challenges in clinical implementation of microarray profiles. We integrated several ovarian cancer datasets to identify a reproducible predictor of survival. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Four microarray datasets from different institutions comprising 265 advanced stage tumors were uniformly reprocessed into a single training dataset, also adjusting for inter-laboratory variation ("batch-effect"). Supervised principal component survival analysis was employed to identify prognostic models. Models were independently validated in a 61-patient cohort using a custom array genechip and a publicly available 229-array dataset. Molecular correspondence of high- and low-risk outcome groups between training and validation datasets was demonstrated using Subclass Mapping. Previously established molecular phenotypes in the 2(nd) validation set were correlated with high and low-risk outcome groups. Functional representational and pathway analysis was used to explore gene networks associated with high and low risk phenotypes. A 19-gene model showed optimal performance in the training set (median OS 31 and 78 months, p < 0.01), 1(st) validation set (median OS 32 months versus not-yet-reached, p = 0.026) and 2(nd) validation set (median OS 43 versus 61 months, p = 0.013) maintaining independent prognostic power in multivariate analysis. There was strong molecular correspondence of the respective high- and low-risk tumors between training and 1(st) validation set. Low and high-risk tumors were enriched for favorable and unfavorable molecular subtypes and pathways, previously defined in the public 2(nd) validation set. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Integration of previously generated cancer microarray datasets may lead to robust and widely applicable survival predictors. These predictors are not simply a compilation of prognostic genes but appear to track true molecular phenotypes of good- and poor-outcome

    When Is a β€œPrognostic Factor” Really Prognostic?

    No full text

    Phase II Trials in Journal of Clinical Oncology

    No full text

    In Reply:

    No full text

    Gynecologic Oncology or Medical Oncology: What's in a Name?

    No full text

    Back to the Future: Multiagent Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Revisited

    No full text

    Performance of Biopsies in Clinical Research

    No full text

    New Initiatives at Journal of Clinical Oncology

    No full text

    The Ethics of Early Stopping Rules: Who Is Protecting Whom?

    No full text
    corecore