An updated perspective on immunoglobulin replacement in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in the era of targeted therapies

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is a malignancy of clonally expanded antigen-switched, neoplastic, mature B cells. CLL is characterised by a variable degree of immunosuppression and secondary hypogammaglobulinemia. B-cell depleting therapies have historically been deployed with a proportion of patients becoming resistant to multiple lines of treatment with an associated worsening of immunosuppression and heightened infection risk. Advances in molecular diagnostics and the development of new therapies targeting Bruton's tyrosine kinase and B-cell lymphoma-2 have resulted in novel insights into the cellular mechanisms associated with an increased infection risk and T-cell escape from the complex tumour environment found in CLL. Generally, immunoglobulin replacement therapy with polyvalent human immunoglobulin G (IgG) is indicated in patients with recurrent severe bacterial infections and low IgG levels, but there is no consensus on the threshold IgG level for initiation of such therapy. A proportion of CLL patients have residual IgG production, with preserved quality of the immunoglobulin molecules, and therefore a definition of 'IgG quality' may allow for lower dosing or less frequent treatment with immunoglobulin therapy in such patients. Immunoglobulin therapy can restore innate immunity and in conjunction with CLL targeted therapies may allow T-cell antigen priming, restore T-cell function thereby providing an escape from tumour-associated autoimmunity and the development of an immune-mediated anti-tumour effect. This review aims to discuss the mechanisms by which CLL-targeted therapy may exert a synergistic therapeutic effect with immunoglobulin replacement therapy both in terms of reducing tumour bulk and restoration of immune function. KEYWORDS C L L , h y p o g a m m a g l o b u l i n e m i a , I g r e p l a c e m e n t , i m m u n o m o d u l a t i o n , restoration immunity Frontiers in Oncolog

Clinical relevance and treatment of nonautoimmune anemia in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Anemia has an unfavorable impact on quality of life in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), increases the likelihood of receiving blood transfusions, and eventually has a negative impact on overall survival. Although discrepancies in perception of health-related quality of life between doctors and patients lead to the undertreatment of anemia, CLL patients undergoing chemotherapy who have a hemoglobin level <10 g/dL should be considered for treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. For hemoglobin values of 10–12 g/dL, the role of performance status and comorbidities should not be underestimated. In this setting, the evaluation of physical fitness using the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale should help physicians to identify those patients with hemoglobin levels of 10–12 g/dL who are suitable for therapy with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Finally, the increasing use of aggressive approaches to therapy should encourage physicians towards appropriate management of chemotherapy-induced anemia in CLL patients

Advancements in the Treatment of CLL: The Rise of Zanubrutinib as a Preferred Therapeutic Option

Ibrutinib, the first-in-class Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), is a commonly deployed therapeutic option for previously untreated and relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The use of ibrutinib is, however, partially limited by off-target side effects. Zanubrutinib (zanu) is a second-generation BTKi with enhanced target selectivity and occupancy of the kinase binding site. The SEQUOIA study showed that zanu significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) when compared to bendamustine–rituximab (BR) in treatment-naive CLL patients. More recently, data from the phase III ALPINE trial, which directly compared zanu with ibrutinib, demonstrated that zanu’s advantages include an improved safety profile as well as enhanced clinical efficacy. Based on the results of the SEQUOIA and ALPINE pivotal trials, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) licensed zanu for the treatment of patients with CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in January 2023. The updated (v2.2023) National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and the most recent German CLL algorithm suggest that zanu may replace first-generation BTKis as a preferred therapeutic option for patients with CLL/SLL due to its increased selectivity for the kinase binding site, improved therapeutic efficacy, and favorable toxicity profile. Some drug class-related characteristics such as drug resistance, low complete remission (CR) rates, and indefinite treatment duration still remain with zanu, and the results from recently completed and ongoing fixed-duration clinical trials, combining zanu with an anti-BCL2 agent, are eagerly awaited with the possible promise of a reduced treatment duration and lower financial burden

Impact of Targeted Agents on Survival of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients Fit for Fludarabine, Cyclophosphamide, and Rituximab (FCR) Relative to Age- and Sex-Matched Population

To assess the impact of first-line treatment with targeted agents (TAs) or fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR)-based chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) on overall survival (OS) compared to age- and sex-matched individuals in the general population, we conducted an aggregated analysis of phase 3 clinical trials, including the two FLAIR sub-studies, ECOG1912, and CLL13 trials. The restricted mean survival time (RMST), an alternative measure in outcome analyses capturing OS changes over the entire history of the disease, was used to minimize biases associated with the short follow-up time of trials. Patients treated with TAs demonstrated a higher 5-year RMST (58.1 months; 95% CI: 57.4 to 58.8) compared to those treated with CIT (5-year RMST, 56.9 months; 95% CI: 56.7–58.2). Furthermore, the OS comparison of treatment groups with the AGMGP suggests that TAs may mitigate the impact of CLL on OS during the first five years post-treatment initiation. In summary, the 5-year RMST difference was −0.4 months (95% CI: −0.8 to 0.2; p = 0.10) when comparing CLL patients treated with TAs to the Italian age- and gender-matched general population (AGMGP). A similar trend was observed when CLL patients treated with TAs were compared to the US AGMGP (5-year RMST difference, 0.3 months; 95% CI: −0.1 to 0.9; p = 0.12). In contrast, CLL patients treated with FCR exhibited sustained OS differences when compared to both the Italian cohort (5-year RMST difference: −1.6 months; 95% CI: −2.4 to −0.9; p < 0.0001) and the US AGMGP cohort (5-year RMST difference: −0.9 months; 95% CI: −1.7 to −0.2; p = 0.015). Although these results support TAs as the preferred first-line treatment for younger CLL patients, it is crucial to acknowledge that variations in patient selection criteria and clinical profiles across clinical trials necessitate a cautious interpretation of these findings that should be viewed as directional and hypothesis-generating. A longer follow-up is needed to assess the survival improvement of younger CLL patients treated with TAs relative to the AGMGP

Spotlight on landmark oncology trials: the latest evidence and novel trial designs.

The era of precision oncology is marked with prominent successes in the therapy of advanced soft tissue sarcomas, breast cancer, ovarian cancer and haematological neoplasms, among others. Moreover, recent trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, and head and neck cancers have significantly influenced the therapeutic landscape by providing promising evidence for immunotherapy efficacy in the adjuvant setting in high-risk locoregional disease. To speed up the introduction of targeted therapy for cancer patients, novel phase II trials are being designed, and may likely form the basis for the 'landmark trials' of the future. A special article collection in BMC Medicine, "Spotlight on landmark oncology trials", features articles from invited experts on recent clinical practice-changing trials

Spotlight on landmark oncology trials: the latest evidence and novel trial designs

Abstract The era of precision oncology is marked with prominent successes in the therapy of advanced soft tissue sarcomas, breast cancer, ovarian cancer and haematological neoplasms, among others. Moreover, recent trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, and head and neck cancers have significantly influenced the therapeutic landscape by providing promising evidence for immunotherapy efficacy in the adjuvant setting in high-risk locoregional disease. To speed up the introduction of targeted therapy for cancer patients, novel phase II trials are being designed, and may likely form the basis for the ‘landmark trials’ of the future. A special article collection in BMC Medicine, “Spotlight on landmark oncology trials”, features articles from invited experts on recent clinical practice-changing trials

An updated perspective on immunoglobulin replacement in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in the era of targeted therapies

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is a malignancy of clonally expanded antigen-switched, neoplastic, mature B cells. CLL is characterised by a variable degree of immunosuppression and secondary hypogammaglobulinemia. B-cell depleting therapies have historically been deployed with a proportion of patients becoming resistant to multiple lines of treatment with an associated worsening of immunosuppression and heightened infection risk. Advances in molecular diagnostics and the development of new therapies targeting Bruton’s tyrosine kinase and B-cell lymphoma-2 have resulted in novel insights into the cellular mechanisms associated with an increased infection risk and T-cell escape from the complex tumour environment found in CLL. Generally, immunoglobulin replacement therapy with polyvalent human immunoglobulin G (IgG) is indicated in patients with recurrent severe bacterial infections and low IgG levels, but there is no consensus on the threshold IgG level for initiation of such therapy. A proportion of CLL patients have residual IgG production, with preserved quality of the immunoglobulin molecules, and therefore a definition of ‘IgG quality’ may allow for lower dosing or less frequent treatment with immunoglobulin therapy in such patients. Immunoglobulin therapy can restore innate immunity and in conjunction with CLL targeted therapies may allow T-cell antigen priming, restore T-cell function thereby providing an escape from tumour-associated autoimmunity and the development of an immune-mediated anti-tumour effect. This review aims to discuss the mechanisms by which CLL-targeted therapy may exert a synergistic therapeutic effect with immunoglobulin replacement therapy both in terms of reducing tumour bulk and restoration of immune function

Does Adiponectin Act as an Antiangiogenic Factor in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia?

Angiogenesis is involved in the pathogenesis of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and high microvascular density has been found in CLL to be associated with a poor prognosis. In this study, we assessed serum levels of adiponectin in 69 patients with Binet stage A B-CLL, and these values were retrospectively correlated with bone marrow (BM) microvessel area and serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), angiogenin, PECAM-1 (CD31), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), interleukin-8 (IL-8), syndecan-1, and the percentage of CD38+ or ZAP-70+ CLL cells. The positive correlation between serum levels of adiponectin and VEGF (P = .03) does not translate into an increase of the extent of BM angiogenesis (P = .404), FGF-2 (P = .348), angiogenin (P = .402), and CD31 (P = .248) serum concentrations. Accordingly, IL-8 (P = .175), syndecan-1 (P = .06), and MMP-9 (P = .144) circulating levels were not likely to reflect adiponectin concentration. Furthermore, patients with higher levels of adiponectin had a more favorable biological profile as defined by a lower number of both CD38− (r = −0.294; P = .02) and ZAP-70+ (r = −0.285; P = .04). Finally, we evaluated the presence of adiponectin in B-CLL cells at gene expression level. RMA intensity values for adiponectin gene transcript denote a homogeneous low expression in B-CLL cells, whereas VEGF transcript was highly expressed with a degree of interpatient variability. Overall, these data seem to indicate that adiponectin could be involved as an antiangiogenic factor in B-CLL

Gilteritinib and the risk of intracranial hemorrhage: a case series of a possible, under-reported side effect

Gilteritinib is currently approved for patients with relapsed/refractory AML with FLT3 mutations, based on the positive results of the pivotal ADMIRAL study. In ADMIRAL trial, no increased risk of bleeding was reported, but in the previous dose finding study, a single event of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) was registered after exposure to subtherapeutic doses of gilteritinib. Here, we report the first case series on five ICHs diagnosed in patients with FLT3-mutated AML, occurred within the first month of exposure to gilteritinib. Our cohort included 24 patients treated in three Italian centers. Most of these ICH cases were non-severe and self-limiting, while one was fatal. This link with ICHs remains in any case uncertain for the presence of active AML. We further reported that an analysis of the post-marketing surveillance data (EudraVigilance) retrieved other 11 cases of ICHs present in the database after gilteritinib treatment. A causality assessment was performed according to the Dx3 method to evaluate the possibility that ICHs might be an actual side effect of gilteritinib. In conclusion, further research is needed to elucidate the potential role of gilteritinib in the pathogenesis of ICHs