Biological and Histological Assessment of the Hepatoportoenterostomy Role in Biliary Atresia as a Stand-Alone Procedure or as a Bridge toward Liver Transplantation

Background and objectives: In patients with biliary atresia (BA), hepatoportoenterostomy (HPE) is still a valuable therapeutic tool for prolonged survival or a safer transition to liver transplantation. The main focus today is towards efficient screening programs, a faster diagnostic, and prompt treatment. However, the limited information on BA pathophysiology makes valuable any experience in disease management. This study aimed to analyze the evolution and survival of patients with BA referred for HPE (Kasai operation) in our department. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on fourteen patients with BA, diagnosed in the pediatric department and further referred for HPE in our surgical department between 2010 and 2016. After HPE, the need for transplantation was assessed according to patients cytomegalovirus (CMV) status, and histological and biochemical analysis. Follow-up results at 1–4 years and long term survival were assessed. Results: Mean age at surgery was 70 days. Surgery in patients younger than 60 days was correlated with survival. Jaundice’s clearance rate at three months was 36%. Total and direct bilirubin values had a significant variation between patients with liver transplants and native liver (p = 0.02). CMV was positive in eight patients, half with transplant need and half with native liver survival. Smooth muscle actin (SMA) positivity was proof of advanced fibrosis. The overall survival rate was 79%, with 75% for native liver patients and an 83% survival rate for those with liver transplantation. Transplantation was performed in six patients (43%), with a mean of 10 months between HPE and transplantation. Transplanted patients had better survival. Complications were diagnosed in 63% of patients. The mean follow-up period was six years. Conclusions: HPE, even performed in advanced cirrhosis, allows a significant survival, and ensures an essential time gain for patients requiring liver transplantation. A younger age at surgery is correlated with a better outcome, despite early CMV infection

Delayed colorectal cancer care during covid-19 pandemic (decor-19). Global perspective from an international survey

Background The widespread nature of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been unprecedented. We sought to analyze its global impact with a survey on colorectal cancer (CRC) care during the pandemic. Methods The impact of COVID-19 on preoperative assessment, elective surgery, and postoperative management of CRC patients was explored by a 35-item survey, which was distributed worldwide to members of surgical societies with an interest in CRC care. Respondents were divided into two comparator groups: 1) ‘delay’ group: CRC care affected by the pandemic; 2) ‘no delay’ group: unaltered CRC practice. Results A total of 1,051 respondents from 84 countries completed the survey. No substantial differences in demographics were found between the ‘delay’ (745, 70.9%) and ‘no delay’ (306, 29.1%) groups. Suspension of multidisciplinary team meetings, staff members quarantined or relocated to COVID-19 units, units fully dedicated to COVID-19 care, personal protective equipment not readily available were factors significantly associated to delays in endoscopy, radiology, surgery, histopathology and prolonged chemoradiation therapy-to-surgery intervals. In the ‘delay’ group, 48.9% of respondents reported a change in the initial surgical plan and 26.3% reported a shift from elective to urgent operations. Recovery of CRC care was associated with the status of the outbreak. Practicing in COVID-free units, no change in operative slots and staff members not relocated to COVID-19 units were statistically associated with unaltered CRC care in the ‘no delay’ group, while the geographical distribution was not. Conclusions Global changes in diagnostic and therapeutic CRC practices were evident. Changes were associated with differences in health-care delivery systems, hospital’s preparedness, resources availability, and local COVID-19 prevalence rather than geographical factors. Strategic planning is required to optimize CRC care