Recent Developments in Attorneys\u27 Fees

Special Project-- Recent Developments in Attorneys\u27 Fees In recent years, the subject of attorneys\u27 fees has become the focal point of pressures to improve the accessibility of legal services for those unable to pay large fees. Courts, scholars, and special interest groups have examined in detail the relationship between fees and the ability to assert legal rights. This increased scrutiny has led to the elimination of minimum fee schedules, the criticism of and possible relaxation of restrictions on fee advertising, and the establishment of maximum contingent fee schedules by court rule. Private enforcement of newly enacted federal statutes against private corporations and state governments has created controversy over exceptions to the traditional rule against fee shifting and the scope of the bar of the eleventh amendment. These debates and the decisions accompanying them have important implications for the issue of whether, in a pragmatic sense, private citizens and organizations may be expected to play a major role in enforcing public rights and standards of governmental conduct. This project will consider recent developments in the attorneys\u27 fee area by analyzing the legal background of each problem and the implications of the last year\u27s developments

Special Project

The One Hundred and First Justice: An Analysis of the Opinions of Justice John Paul Stevens, Sitting as Judge on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals This article will examine the opinions written by Mr. Justice Stevens while he served on the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The areas examined are constitutional, antitrust, labor, securities, federal tax, administrative, and federal jurisdictional law. This article also will seek to reach some conclusions on Stevens\u27 position in the several areas while he served on the Seventh Circuit and to suggest the factors he may consider important in deciding cases in the future. We hope the article will give its readers an opportunity to analyze and evaluate the existing opinions of the new associate justice and to gain some insight into the way he approaches cases. An appendix is provided that describes briefly those opinions we consider of interest.\u2