Effect of extracorporeal liver support by MARS and Prometheus on serum cytokines in acute-on-chronic liver failure

INTRODUCTION: Cytokines are believed to play an important role in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Extracorporeal liver support systems may exert beneficial effects in ACLF via removal of cytokines. At present, two systems are commercially available, the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS™) and Fractionated Plasma Separation, Adsorption and Dialysis (Prometheus™). The aim of this study was to compare the effects of MARS and Prometheus treatments on serum cytokine levels and their clearances. METHODS: Eight patients with ACLF underwent alternating treatments with either MARS or Prometheus in a randomized cross-over design. Thirty-four treatments (17 MARS, 17 Prometheus) were available for analysis. Serum cytokines were measured before and after each treatment, and cytokine clearance was calculated from paired arterial and venous samples and effective plasma flow one hour after the start of treatment. RESULTS: Baseline serum levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and soluble TNF-α receptor 1 were significantly elevated in patients with ACLF. Measurable plasma clearances were detected for all cytokines tested, but no significant changes in serum levels of any cytokine were found after treatments with MARS or Prometheus. In MARS treatments, IL-10 was cleared from plasma more efficiently than IL-6. Clearance of IL-10 was higher in Prometheus than in MARS treatments. CONCLUSION: Cytokines are cleared from plasma by both MARS and Prometheus, but neither system is able to change serum cytokine levels. This discrepancy is probably due to a high rate of cytokine production in patients with ACLF

Increased Hepato-Splanchnic Vasoconstriction in Diabetics during Regular Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Ultrafiltration (UF) of excess fluid activates numerous compensatory mechanisms during hemodialysis (HD). The increase of both total peripheral and splanchnic vascular resistance is considered essential in maintaining hemodynamic stability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent of UF-induced changes in hepato-splanchnic blood flow and resistance in a group of maintenance HD patients during regular dialysis. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS:Hepato-splanchnic flow resistance index (RI) and hepato-splanchnic perfusion index (QI) were measured in 12 chronic HD patients using a modified, non-invasive Indocyaningreen (ICG) dilution method. During a midweek dialysis session we determined RI, QI, ICG disappearance rate (kICG), plasma volume (Vp), hematocrit (Hct), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) at four times in hourly intervals (t1 to t4). Dialysis settings were standardized and all patient studies were done in duplicate. RESULTS:In the whole study group mean UF volume was 1.86 ± 0.46 L, Vp dropped from 3.65 ± 0.77L at t1 to 3.40 ± 0.78L at t4, and all patients remained hemodynamically stable. In all patients RI significantly increased from 12.40 ± 4.21 mmHg∙s∙m2/mL at t1 to 14.94 ± 6.36 mmHg∙s∙m2/mL at t4 while QI significantly decreased from 0.61 ± 0.22 at t1 to 0.52 ± 0.20 L/min/m2 at t4, indicating active vasoconstriction. In diabetic subjects, however, RI was significantly larger than in non-diabetics at all time points. QI was lower in diabetic subjects. CONCLUSIONS:In chronic HD-patients hepato-splanchnic blood flow substantially decreases during moderate UF as a result of an active splanchnic vasoconstriction. Our data indicate that diabetic HD-patients are particularly prone to splanchnic ischemia and might therefore have an increased risk for bacterial translocation, endotoxemia and systemic inflammation

Application of a multispecies probiotic reduces gastro-intestinal discomfort and induces microbial changes after colonoscopy

Even after decades of research and pharmaceutical development, cancer is still one of the most common causes of death in the western population and the management of cancer will remain a major challenge of medical research. One of the most common types of cancer is colorectal cancer (CRC). Prevention by detection of early-stage precursors is the most reliable method to prevent CRC development. In dependence of age, familial predisposition, and other risk factors the preventative routine screening for CRC by colonoscopy should be performed at least twice in intervals of about ten years. Although colonoscopy is a life-saving clinical examination reducing both incidence and mortality of CRC significantly, it has still a bad reputation in the population as an uncomfortable procedure with unpleasant side effects lasting sometimes over days to weeks. These effects are most likely caused by the bowel preparation before colonoscopy, which is crucial for a successful colonoscopy with high quality. Beside pain, bleeding and other rare but severe complications of colonoscopy, cleaning of the intestinal mucosa alters the gut microbiome significantly and consistently. Abdominal pain, cramps, diarrhea, nausea, bloating, and constipation are common adverse events which can continue to affect patients for days or even weeks after the procedure. In this multicenter, placebo controlled, double blind clinical trial, we investigated the effect of an intervention with a multispecies probiotic formulation for 30 days on the adverse events due to bowel preparation. We show that the treatment of participants with the multispecies probiotic formulation decreases the number of days with constipation significantly, and reduced pain, bloating, diarrhea, and general discomfort. 16S based amplicon analyses reveal recovery of administered probiotic strains from stool samples and differences in alpha diversity dynamics with higher variability in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group. In conclusion, the probiotic ameliorates the side effects after colonoscopy and might be an important supplement to increase acceptance of this life-saving preventative examination. Further, we present here for the first time that probiotic intervention of only 30 days affects alpha diversity parameters in stool samples

Secondary Sclerosing Cholangitis in Critically Ill Patients Alters the Gut–Liver Axis: A Case Control Study

Secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients (SC-CIP) occurs after long-term intensive care treatment. This study aimed to assess the gut–liver axis in SC-CIP. Stool microbiome composition, gut permeability, bacterial translocation and serum bile acid profiles of 18 SC-CIP patients compared to 11 patients after critical illness without liver disease (CIP controls), 21 patients with cirrhosis and 21 healthy controls were studied. 16S rDNA was isolated from stool and sequenced using the Illumina technique. Diamine oxidase, zonulin, soluble CD14 (sCD14) and lipopolysaccharide binding protein were measured in serum and calprotectin in stool. Serum bile acids were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS). Reduced microbiome alpha diversity and altered beta diversity were seen in SC-CIP, CIP controls and cirrhosis compared to healthy controls. SC-CIP patients showed a shift towards pathogenic taxa and an oralization. SC-CIP, CIP controls and cirrhotic patients presented with impaired gut permeability, and biomarkers of bacterial translocation were increased in SC-CIP and cirrhosis. Total serum bile acids were elevated in SC-CIP and cirrhosis and the bile acid profile was altered in SC-CIP, CIP controls and cirrhosis. In conclusions, observed alterations of the gut–liver axis in SC-CIP cannot solely be attributed to liver disease, but may also be secondary to long-term intensive care treatment

HDL-related biomarkers are robust predictors of survival in patients with chronic liver failure

Abstract Background & Aims The occurrence of acute decompensation (AD) worsens the prognosis of advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD). Various insults leading to increased systemic inflammation trigger acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) with dramatically increased short-term mortality. During acute conditions such as sepsis, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels decrease rapidly and HDL particles undergo profound changes in their composition and function. Indices of HDL quantity and quality may therefore associate with progression and survival in patients with advanced liver disease. Methods We studied levels of HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), its subclasses HDL2-C and HDL3-C, and apolipoprotein(apo)A-I as indices of HDL quantity and HDL cholesterol efflux capacity as a metric of HDL functionality in 508 patients with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis including ACLF and 40 age- and gender-matched controls. Results Baseline levels of HDL-C and apoA-I were significantly lower in stable cirrhosis compared to control and further decreased in AD and ACLF . In stable cirrhosis (n=228), both HDL-C and apoA-I predicted the development of liver-related complications independently of MELD. In patients with AD with or without ACLF (n=280) both HDL-C and apoA-I were MELD-independent predictors of 90-day mortality. On ROC analysis, high diagnostic accuracies for 90-day mortality in AD patients were found for HDL-C (AUROC 0.79 ) and apoA-I (AUROC 0.80 ), very similar to that of MELD (AUROC 0.81 ). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, HDL-C 17 mg/dl and apoA-I 50 mg/dl indicated poor short-term survival. The prognostic accuracy of HDL-C was validated in a large external validation cohort of 985 patients with portal hypertension due to ACLD (AUROCs HDL-C: 0.81 vs. MELD: 0.77). Conclusion HDL-related biomarkers are robust predictors of disease progression and survival in chronic liver failure

HDL-related biomarkers are robust predictors of survival in patients with chronic liver failure

Background & Aims: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels are reduced in patients with chronic liver disease and inversely correlate with disease severity. During acute conditions such as sepsis, HDL-C levels decrease rapidly and HDL particles undergo profound changes in their composition and function. We aimed to determine whether indices of HDL quantity and quality associate with progression and survival in patients with advanced liver disease. Methods: HDL-related biomarkers were studied in 508 patients with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis (including acute-on-chronic liver failure [ACLF]) and 40 age- and gender-matched controls. Specifically, we studied levels of HDL-C, its subclasses HDL2-C and HDL3-C, and apolipoprotein A1 (apoA-I), as well as HDL cholesterol efflux capacity as a metric of HDL functionality. Results: Baseline levels of HDL-C and apoA-I were significantly lower in patients with stable cirrhosis compared to controls and were further decreased in patients with acute decompensation (AD) and ACLF. In stable cirrhosis (n = 228), both HDL-C and apoA-I predicted the development of liver-related complications independently of model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. In patients with AD, with or without ACLF (n = 280), both HDL-C and apoA-I were MELD-independent predictors of 90-day mortality. On ROC analysis, both HDL-C and apoA-I had high diagnostic accuracy for 90-day mortality in patients with AD (AUROCs of 0.79 and 0.80, respectively, similar to that of MELD 0.81). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, HDL-C <17 mg/dl and apoA-I <50 mg/dl indicated poor short-term survival. The prognostic accuracy of HDL-C was validated in a large external validation cohort of 985 patients with portal hypertension due to advanced chronic liver disease (AUROCs HDL-C: 0.81 vs. MELD: 0.77). Conclusion: HDL-related biomarkers are robust predictors of disease progression and survival in chronic liver failure

Randomized-controlled trial of the DIALIVE liver dialysis device vs. standard of care in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) is characterized by severe systemic inflammation, multi-organ failure and high mortality rates. Its treatment is an urgent unmet need. DIALIVE is a novel liver dialysis device that aims to exchange d ysfunctional albumin and remove damage- and pathogen-associated molecular patterns. This first-in-man randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed with the primary aim of assessing its safety in ACLF patients with secondary aims to evaluate its clinical effects, device performance and effect on pathophysiologically-relevant biomarkers. METHODS: 32 alcoholic cirrhosis patients with ACLF were included. Patients were treated with DIALIVE for up to 5-days and end points were assessed at Day-10. Safety was assessed in all patients (n=32). The secondary aims were assessed in a pre-specified subgroup that had at least 3-treatment sessions with DIALIVE (n=30). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in 28-day mortality or occurrence of serious adverse events between the groups. Significant reduction in the severity of endotoxemia and improvement in albumin function was observed in DIALIVE group, which translated into a significant reduction in the CLIF-C (Chronic Liver Failure consortium) organ failure (p=0.018) and CLIF-C ACLF scores (p=0.042) at Day-10. Time to resolution of ACLF was significantly faster in DIALIVE group (p=0.036). Biomarkers of systemic inflammation such as IL-8 (p=0.006), cell death [cytokeratin-18: M30 (p=0.005) and M65 (p=0.029)], endothelial function [asymmetric dimethylarginine (p=0.002)] and, ligands for toll-like receptor 4 (p=0.030) and inflammasome (p=0.002) improved significantly in DIALIVE group. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that DIALIVE appears to be safe and impacts positively on prognostic scores and pathophysiologically relevant biomarkers in patients with ACLF. Larger, adequately powered studies are warranted to further confirm its safety and efficacy. LAY SUMMARY: This is the first-in-man clinical trial which tested DIALIVE, a novel liver dialysis device for the treatment of liver cirrhosis and acute on chronic liver failure, a condition associated with severe inflammation, organ failures and a high risk of death. The study met the primary end point confirming DIALIVE system to be safe. Additionally, it reduced inflammation with improved clinical parameters. It did not, however, reduce mortality in this small study and requires further larger clinical trials to re-confirm its safety and evaluate efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT03065699